06.05.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to have grapes of both styles (pl. VI.18j, m).<br />

The vine medallions and the figures at the<br />

Hazor-Ashdod, Ma#on, and Shellal mosaics are<br />

characteristically shown in a stylized and flat fashion.<br />

The artists at Ma#on exhibit a keen sense<br />

of humour, for example, the hen laying an egg<br />

(pl. VI.19a), the depiction of the hunting dog, the<br />

elephants, and the leopard cub playing outside<br />

the leopard medallion. By contrast, the images<br />

in the mosaics of Gaza, Be"er Shem#a, el-Hammam,<br />

and Sts. Lot and Procopius are portrayed<br />

in the ‘Justinian Renaissance’ style (Kitzinger<br />

1976). A revival style with secular iconography,<br />

it is characterized by striking changes in the style<br />

of the figures with the illusion of supple movement,<br />

the animals moving outside their frames, a<br />

three-dimensional description, and an interest in<br />

anatomical details. The rendition of the animals<br />

is sometimes impressionistic and sometimes realistic,<br />

with quite natural and lively poses. A group<br />

of wild and domestic animals depicted on the<br />

Be"er-Shem#a, Shellal and Petra mosaics appear<br />

calmly standing with an inclined (lowered or bent)<br />

head, in a position of compliance and tameness<br />

(pl. VI.20). This posture of docility is also characteristic<br />

of the animals depicted on the David<br />

-Orpheus mosaic at the Gaza synagogue and the<br />

Jabaliyah diakonikon pavement (pl. XII.3b,c).<br />

The spaces between the scrolls on the mosaics<br />

are filled with bunches of grapes and vine leaves<br />

in accordance with the characteristic horror vacui.<br />

But space between the scrolls filled by animals,<br />

especially birds, is a phenomenon distinctive of<br />

some of the mosaics of Israel (see Tables VI-1-2).<br />

The inhabited scrolls mosaic of Hazor-Ashdod<br />

shows birds filling the spaces between the three<br />

surviving rows; at Be"er Shem#a two birds are<br />

set between the central medallions of rows 2 and<br />

3, and another couple of birds appear between<br />

the central medallions of rows 6 and 7. At the<br />

Beth She"an synagogue birds are depicted in the<br />

spaces around the medallion of the menorah. The<br />

spaces between all the scrolls of Room L of the<br />

Monastery of Lady Mary at Beth She"an are filled<br />

with animals and birds. At el-Hammam two birds<br />

appear between the central medallions of rows<br />

4 and 5. A sole example in Arabia appears on<br />

the mosaic of Elias, Maria, and Soreg at Gerasa;<br />

a pair of birds are shown in the space flanking<br />

the tree medallion and another bird is rendered<br />

between the four upper medallions on the left.<br />

The figures with parts outside the medallion are<br />

the ‘inhabited scrolls’ mosaic pavements 143<br />

not a chronological indication (as suggested by<br />

Talgam 1998: 80), nor are the images placed outside<br />

between the medallions.<br />

C. Origin, Development, and Interpretation<br />

The origin of the vine-trellis on mosaic pavements<br />

is a reflection on the floor of an overhead pergola.<br />

This type of mosaic was developed in Roman<br />

North Africa in the 2nd-3rd centuries, depicting<br />

Cupids in vintage scenes (Avi-Yonah 1936:<br />

19). The composition is rendered with the trellises<br />

represented naturalistically all over the floor,<br />

sometimes forming circular scrolls, and growing<br />

from its four corners (see Oudna, the villa of the<br />

Laberii; Lavin 1963: 221, fig. 55; Kondoleon<br />

1995: 235-242,252, figs. 150, 153). The mosaic<br />

pavements of group V seem to follow this early<br />

tradition. Levi (1947, I: 509) maintains that the<br />

origin of the earlier arrangement of the motif with<br />

four corner amphorae was in imitation of a real<br />

arbor: ‘The vine-trellis is conceived, obviously, as<br />

formed with shoots climbing up along the four<br />

pilasters in the corners’. In the early 4th century<br />

a transitional type appears on the wall mosaic of<br />

Santa Constanza in Rome. The diagonal vine<br />

design had a tradition in North African mosaics<br />

in examples found before the 4th century at Cherchel-Caesarea<br />

and ‘Maison Byzantine’ at Sousse<br />

and elsewhere (Dauphin 1987: 189, figs. 11, 15).<br />

The fully developed Byzantine type appears in<br />

the first half of the 5th century, consisting of the<br />

central amphora flanked by birds, usually peacocks,<br />

from which issue vine trellises that develop<br />

into symmetrical scrolls. An interesting comparable<br />

pavement is found at the Justinian church<br />

at Sabratha (Ward Perkins and Goodchild 1953:<br />

pl. XXVI) comprising a design of vine branches<br />

issuing from a stylized acanthus leaf inhabited by<br />

a great number of birds. The four central oval<br />

medallions connected by rings are inhabited by a<br />

bird-in-cage and a large peacock with a spread tail<br />

in the upper medallion. Avi-Yonah (1936: 19-20)<br />

suggests that the similar type of mosaic laid in<br />

the 6th century in Africa, Italy, Palaestina, and<br />

Syria evolved under the ‘Justinian Renaissance’,<br />

probably radiating from a single centre, the imperial<br />

court at Constantinople (see also Hunt 1994:<br />

115-119; Balty 1995: 118-121). Trilling (1985:<br />

33-37) argues that the inhabited scrolls mosaics<br />

‘confirm the principles of the medallion style—

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!