06.05.2013 Views

View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository

View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository

View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10.6 Run<strong>of</strong>f models<br />

42<br />

Models are not discussed in any detail in this publication. Two <strong>of</strong> the run<strong>of</strong>f models used<br />

in South Africa to simulate yields are the ACRU (Agricultural Catchments Research Unit)<br />

Model developed at the Department <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Engineering, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Natal,<br />

Pietermaritzburg (Schulze, 19891*; and the Pitman Monthly Run<strong>of</strong>f Model (Pitman,<br />

19731** developed at the then Hydrological Research Unit <strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Witwatersrand. The Computing Centre for Water Research maintains a list <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

models used in South Africa for various hydrological, engineering, irrigation and water<br />

quality modelling purposes. Selected programs are available from the Centre. A recent<br />

report published by the Water Research Commission and the Department <strong>of</strong> Water Affairs<br />

and Forestry, contains a useful overview <strong>of</strong> some 62 models used in this country. Several<br />

other models are also listed* * * .<br />

*<br />

***<br />

See Schulze, R.E., 1989. ACRU: background, concepts and theory, WRC Report No. 154/1/89,<br />

Water Research Commission, Pretoria, various pages, and Schulze, R.E., George, W.J., lynch, 5.0.<br />

and Angus, G.R., 1989. ACRU - 2.0: user manuat, WRC Report No. 154/2/89, Water Research<br />

Commission, Pretoria, various pages. Note that the model has been revised and that updated<br />

documentation is available. See Schulze, R.E., 1995. Hydrology and agrohydrology: a text to<br />

accompany the ACRU 3.00 agrohydrological modelling system, WRC Report No. TT 69/95, Water<br />

Research Commission, Pretoria, various pages, as well as Smithers, J. and Schulze, R., 1995. ACRU<br />

agrohydrological modelling system: user manual version 3.00, WRC Report No. TT 70/95, Water<br />

Research Commission, Pretoria, various pages.<br />

See Pitrnan, W.V., 1973. A mathematical model for generating monthly river flows from<br />

meteorological data in South Africa, HRU Report No. 2173, Hydrological Research Unit, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, various pages. Note that the Pitrnan Model has been restructured.<br />

The updated version, the Water Resources Simulation Model (WRSM90) was written to run on a PC.<br />

(For an urban perspective see Green, I.R.A. and Stephenson, D., 1986. Urban hydrology and<br />

drainage: comparison <strong>of</strong> urban drainage models for use in South Africa, WRC Report No. 115/6/86,<br />

Water Research Commission, Pretoria, 265 p. + app., as well as Stephenson, D., Green, I.R.A. and<br />

Lambourne, J.J., 1986. Urban hydrology and drainage: review, WRC Report No. 11511/86, Water<br />

Research Commission, Pretoria, 119 p. + app. An important series <strong>of</strong> 12 urban catchment<br />

publications (including the executive summary), is also available from the Water Research<br />

Commission, PO Box 824, Pretoria, 0001. An example is given here: Stephenson, D., 1993. Effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> urbanization on catchment water balance, 1. Analysis <strong>of</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> urbanization on run<strong>of</strong>f, WRC<br />

Report No. 18311/93, Water Research Commission, Pretoria, 78 p.).<br />

See CSIR Environmental Services, 1995. Procedures to assess effluent discharge impacts, WRC<br />

Report No. TT 64/94, Water Research Commission and the Department <strong>of</strong> Water Affairs and Forestry,<br />

Pretoria, 352 p.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!