View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
Table L7: Some South African industrial water consumption data including wastewater quality information. 265 Industry Details Soft drinks and The numerous carbonated soft drink bottling and canning plants, dairies and fruit juice packaging plants in South carbonated waters Africa, produce some 1,5 x 10 6 m 3 of soft drink on an annual basis. Fruit juice plants and dairies are responsible Industry for 5% and 10% of the total volume respectively, with the balance produced by the carbonated soft drink bottling and canning plants. A total annual consumption of approximately 4,0 x 10 6 m 3 of water, of which 60 - 80% is discharged as wastewater, was evident. The mean SWI (Specific Water Intakel was 2,7 m 3 of water per m 3 of soft drink, with a recommended target SWI of 2,3 m 3 of water per m 3 of soft drink produced. The mean SPL (Specific Pollution Load) was 4,0 kg COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand) per m 3 of soft drink, with a suggested target SPL for untreated wastewater of 3,5 kg COD per m 3 of soft drink. A target of 5 kg total dissolved solids (salts) per m 3 of soft drink for plants with bottle washers, and a target of 1,6 kg total dissolved solids per m 3 of soft drink for plantS without bottle washers, was suggested Dairy Industry Over 150 dairies in South Africa consume approximately 4,6 x 10 6 m 3 of water annually, of which 75 - 95% is discharged as wastewater. The relevant data are summarized below: Category SWI Target SWI (volume/volume unless otherwise indicated) Pasteurised milk 1,a· 0,76· (bulk production) Pasteurised milk packed in - sachets 1,7* 1,' * - cartons 2,2· 1,6· - bottles 3,0· 2,0· Other milk products in cartons or plastic tubs - cultured products 10,2 a,3 - fruit juices and mixes 2,7 1,7 - sterilized/UHT products 3,7 2,0 - skim milk 3,a· 2,1·
Table L7: 266 Some South African industrial water consumption data including wastewater quality information (continued). Industry Details Dairy industry Dry milk products 11,8 m3 (continued) • milk powder t'" 8,7 m3 , cheese 23,0 m3 t· t'" 1 • butter • 1,5m 20,0 m3 t'1. 3 t"· 1,3 m3 t"· • ice cream • condensed milk 2,5 4,4 m 1,9 3 t"· 3,5 m3 t"· Malt brewing Industry N.Qm: An asterisk denotes items produced from raw milk, and the data include water consumed in the reception stage. Data without an asterisk refer to products derived from intermediate materials. The reception function was examined separately and a specific water usage of 0,6 volume/volume was determined for reception only, with a proposed target of 0,4 volume/volume (based on the volume of raw milk received) Most of the water consumed in the dairy industry is for cleaning operations. In this regard, the use of plastic sachets rather than bottles was suggested, which would result in a considerable reduction in water consumption, as well as a reduction in wastewater volumes and pollutant loads In 1986 there were eight malt beer breweries in South Africa, which produced approximately 1,2 x 10 6 m 3 of beer annually. Total annual water consumption was some 8,7 x 10 6 m 3 , with 65 ·70% of the water consumed, being discharged as wastewater. The SWI varied between 5,5 ' 8,8 m 3 of water per m 3 of beer produced. A target SWI of 6 m 3 of water per m 3 of beer for existing breweries, and 5 m 3 of water per m 3 of beer for new breweries was suggested. The SPL was found to vary between 10,4 , 20,0 kg COD per m 3 of beer produced. The target SPL for untreated wastewater was recommended as 10 kg COD per m 3 of beer produced for eXisting breweries, and 7,5 kg COD per m 3 of beer produced for new breweries
- Page 218: 214 Table K5: The number of ephemer
- Page 222 and 223: JJI...lllJll 218 (h) Some of the wa
- Page 224 and 225: i'•••liDl Group E: Pure water
- Page 226 and 227: 222 Bond, Van Wyk proposed the foll
- Page 228 and 229: 1[11....11.,1 224 (b) Chlorides are
- Page 230 and 231: 226 Source: Edwards, T.J., 1989. Pe
- Page 232 and 233: 228 also obtainable from the Ground
- Page 234 and 235: Ill1••lll1l 230 • Hofkes, EH.
- Page 236 and 237: 232 • Vegter, J.R., 1995. Groundw
- Page 238 and 239: 234 • Meyer, R. and Godfrey, l.,
- Page 240 and 241: Springs 236 • Africa Co-operative
- Page 242 and 243: NOTES: 238
- Page 244 and 245: 239 CHAPTER 12: WATER SUPPLY PLANNI
- Page 246 and 247: 12.1 Introduction 241 111'1&111111
- Page 248 and 249: 243 rilliltl.'ll water consumption
- Page 250 and 251: Table L2: Cattle 245 study of reduc
- Page 252 and 253: Note: (j) (ii) (iii) 247 Animal wat
- Page 254: 249 111111:llllltJI Source: After A
- Page 257 and 258: 1111111118.1 252 Table L4: Some per
- Page 259 and 260: lillll.'.II' 254 high income. Iow d
- Page 261 and 262: * 256 to obtain. Difficulties inclu
- Page 263 and 264: 1111...11 (iii) 258 Home Glasson Pa
- Page 265 and 266: 260 Table L6: Some typical domestic
- Page 267 and 268: * ** 262 are in agreement with cons
- Page 272 and 273: Table L7: 267 Some South African In
- Page 274 and 275: Table L7: 269 Some South African in
- Page 276 and 277: Table L7: 271 Some South African In
- Page 278 and 279: Note: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi)
- Page 281 and 282: 276 concentrate on the provision of
- Page 283: 278 Table L8: RSA-KwaZulu Developme
- Page 286 and 287: Table L9: 281 RSA-KwaZulu Developme
- Page 288 and 289: Table L9: 283 RSA-KwaZulu Developme
- Page 291 and 292: 286 the Green book, namely, Anonymo
- Page 293 and 294: IIIRlmlllillS 12.4.2 Durban Metro W
- Page 296: 291 design phase of projects. Any a
- Page 299 and 300: 294 Table L12: Some extant water wh
- Page 301: 11111111111911 296 • Energy Resea
- Page 304 and 305: 299 11111111111111 Table l13: Speci
- Page 306: 301 Table L13: Specific training ag
- Page 309 and 310: 304 Road and Umlazi (Durban); Pinet
- Page 312: 307 Table L14: A spatial typology o
- Page 315 and 316: 310 Table L15: A typology of social
- Page 317: 1111111..11 312 Table L15: A typolo
Table L7:<br />
266<br />
Some South African industrial water consumption data including wastewater quality information (continued).<br />
Industry Details<br />
Dairy industry Dry milk products<br />
11,8 m3 (continued) • milk powder t'"<br />
8,7 m3 , cheese 23,0 m3 t·<br />
t'"<br />
1 • butter<br />
•<br />
1,5m<br />
20,0 m3 t'1.<br />
3 t"· 1,3 m3 t"·<br />
• ice cream<br />
• condensed milk<br />
2,5<br />
4,4 m<br />
1,9<br />
3 t"· 3,5 m3 t"·<br />
Malt brewing Industry<br />
N.Qm: An asterisk denotes items produced from raw milk, and the data include water consumed in the reception<br />
stage. Data without an asterisk refer to products derived from intermediate materials. The reception function<br />
was examined separately and a specific water usage <strong>of</strong> 0,6 volume/volume was determined for reception only,<br />
with a proposed target <strong>of</strong> 0,4 volume/volume (based on the volume <strong>of</strong> raw milk received)<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the water consumed in the dairy industry is for cleaning operations. In this regard, the use <strong>of</strong> plastic<br />
sachets rather than bottles was suggested, which would result in a considerable reduction in water consumption,<br />
as well as a reduction in wastewater volumes and pollutant loads<br />
In 1986 there were eight malt beer breweries in South Africa, which produced approximately 1,2 x 10 6 m 3 <strong>of</strong><br />
beer annually. Total annual water consumption was some 8,7 x 10 6 m 3 , with 65 ·70% <strong>of</strong> the water consumed,<br />
being discharged as wastewater. The SWI varied between 5,5 ' 8,8 m 3 <strong>of</strong> water per m 3 <strong>of</strong> beer produced. A<br />
target SWI <strong>of</strong> 6 m 3 <strong>of</strong> water per m 3 <strong>of</strong> beer for existing breweries, and 5 m 3 <strong>of</strong> water per m 3 <strong>of</strong> beer for new<br />
breweries was suggested. The SPL was found to vary between 10,4 , 20,0 kg COD per m 3 <strong>of</strong> beer produced.<br />
The target SPL for untreated wastewater was recommended as 10 kg COD per m 3 <strong>of</strong> beer produced for eXisting<br />
breweries, and 7,5 kg COD per m 3 <strong>of</strong> beer produced for new breweries