- Page 1 and 2: AN EXAMINATION OF THE FACTOR STRUCT
- Page 3 and 4: Preface Ethics approval for this re
- Page 5: 3 Results .........................
- Page 9 and 10: Acknowledgements I owe my deepest g
- Page 11 and 12: To my family and friends, Thank you
- Page 13 and 14: among female youth populations, the
- Page 15 and 16: Third, it has been suggested that t
- Page 17 and 18: only a small proportion of conduct-
- Page 19 and 20: irresponsible, and antisocial tende
- Page 21 and 22: A long line of research has demonst
- Page 23 and 24: females. When a model is considered
- Page 25 and 26: to do with whether the measure is w
- Page 27 and 28: Understanding the factor structure
- Page 29 and 30: (Leschied et al., 2001; Moretti, Ca
- Page 31 and 32: psychopathic offenders were signifi
- Page 33 and 34: instrumental aggression. However, w
- Page 35 and 36: Given the relationships between the
- Page 37 and 38: associated with self-report will be
- Page 39 and 40: 1.4.1 Hypotheses The current thesis
- Page 41 and 42: ecords, school records, medical rec
- Page 43 and 44: 2.2.3 Instrumental-Reactive Coding
- Page 45 and 46: eceiving services from YFPS. Althou
- Page 47 and 48: 3 Results 3.1 Coding Reliability In
- Page 49 and 50: This was followed by acquaintance v
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 2. Percentage of cases by se
- Page 53 and 54: index that adjusts for model comple
- Page 55 and 56: Item 1 Item 2 Item 4 Item 5 Item 6
- Page 57 and 58:
(1-19), 38.7% scored in the moderat
- Page 59 and 60:
offences, 28.6% were for revenge or
- Page 61 and 62:
association between the dichotomous
- Page 63 and 64:
from the original dataset. In other
- Page 65 and 66:
in instrumental aggression was acco
- Page 67 and 68:
etween the dichotomous psychopathy
- Page 69 and 70:
psychopath based on a cut score of
- Page 71 and 72:
the three-factor model was unable t
- Page 73 and 74:
sample since violent offenders are
- Page 75 and 76:
who also concluded that antisocial
- Page 77 and 78:
they are less likely to use reactiv
- Page 79 and 80:
more strongly related to instrument
- Page 81 and 82:
Pickard, 2007; Barry, Pickard, & An
- Page 83 and 84:
measure of psychopathy may be limit
- Page 85 and 86:
Further, based on the relatively lo
- Page 87 and 88:
score. Although this is a valid mea
- Page 89 and 90:
Having access to a large sample, we
- Page 91 and 92:
demonstrated, the utility of differ
- Page 93 and 94:
malleable youth sample may facilita
- Page 95 and 96:
Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: I
- Page 97 and 98:
Gender differences in mental health
- Page 99 and 100:
Edens, J. F., Skeem, J. L., Cruise,
- Page 101 and 102:
Frick, P. J., Cornell, A. H., Barry
- Page 103 and 104:
Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2006
- Page 105 and 106:
Jones, S., Cauffman, E., Miller, J.
- Page 107 and 108:
Lynam, D. R. (1996). Early identifi
- Page 109 and 110:
Murrie, D. C., Cornell, D. G., Kapl
- Page 111 and 112:
of the official and self-reported h
- Page 113 and 114:
Salekin, R. T., Rogers, R., & Sewel
- Page 115 and 116:
Stockdale, K. C., Olver, M. E., Won
- Page 117 and 118:
Vitale, J. E., & Newman, J. P. (200
- Page 119 and 120:
Xie, H., Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B
- Page 121 and 122:
Appendix B: Factor Models Table A1
- Page 123 and 124:
112
- Page 125 and 126:
Appendix E: Coding Scheme and Guide
- Page 127 and 128:
PART A: OFFENCE CHARACTERISTICS AND
- Page 129 and 130:
PART C: WOODWORTH & PORTER`S INSTRU