an examination of the factor structure of the psychopathy checklist
an examination of the factor structure of the psychopathy checklist
an examination of the factor structure of the psychopathy checklist
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Using <strong>the</strong> dichotomous <strong>psychopathy</strong> (score ≥ 25) variable, it was found that, on<br />
average, although <strong>of</strong>fenders who were classified as psychopaths (score ≥ 25) scored<br />
higher on <strong>the</strong> continuous instrumentality variable (M = 14.04, SE = 1.15) th<strong>an</strong> those who<br />
were classified as nonpsychopaths (M = 13.22, SE = 0.53), this difference was not<br />
signific<strong>an</strong>t t (117) = -.71, p = .24.<br />
Using <strong>the</strong> dichotomous <strong>psychopathy</strong> (score ≥ 30) variable, it was found that, on<br />
average, <strong>of</strong>fenders who were classified as psychopaths (score ≥ 30) scored lower on<br />
<strong>the</strong> continuous instrumentality variable (M = 12.75, SE = 1.78) th<strong>an</strong> those who were<br />
classified as nonpsychopaths (M = 13.46, SE = 0.51); however, this difference was not<br />
signific<strong>an</strong>t t (117) = .36, p = .36.<br />
A one-way <strong>an</strong>alysis <strong>of</strong> vari<strong>an</strong>ce (ANOVA) was conducted using <strong>the</strong> categorical<br />
<strong>psychopathy</strong> variable to determine if continuous instrumentality scores increase with<br />
<strong>psychopathy</strong>. The ANOVA was not signific<strong>an</strong>t, F (2, 116) = 1.37, p = .26 with a me<strong>an</strong><br />
square (MS) for error <strong>of</strong> 27.92.<br />
Using <strong>the</strong> dichotomous instrumentality variable, it was found that, on average,<br />
<strong>of</strong>fenders who were classified as primarily reactive scored slightly higher on <strong>the</strong><br />
continuous <strong>psychopathy</strong> variable (M = 18.80, SE = 0.81) th<strong>an</strong> those who were classified<br />
as primarily instrumental (M = 18.65, SE = 1.09); however, this difference was not<br />
signific<strong>an</strong>t t (118) = .11, p = .46.<br />
The association between <strong>the</strong> dichotomous instrumentality <strong>an</strong>d dichotomous<br />
<strong>psychopathy</strong> (score ≥ 25) variables was not signific<strong>an</strong>t, χ 2 (1) = .002, p = .96. The<br />
association between <strong>the</strong> dichotomous instrumentality <strong>an</strong>d dichotomous <strong>psychopathy</strong><br />
(score ≥ 30) variables was also not signific<strong>an</strong>t, χ 2 (1) = .50, p = .48. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong><br />
49