an examination of the factor structure of the psychopathy checklist

an examination of the factor structure of the psychopathy checklist an examination of the factor structure of the psychopathy checklist

circle.ubc.ca
from circle.ubc.ca More from this publisher
06.05.2013 Views

2 Method 2.1 Sample The current sample was composed of female adolescents referred to Youth Forensic Psychiatric Services (YFPS) in British Columbia. YFPS provides assessment and treatment services to justice-involved youth, aged 12-17 at the time of their offence. Assessments are conducted by a multidisciplinary team, including, psychologists, psychiatrists, psychiatric social workers, and psychiatric nurses. Under Tri-Council guidelines, permission for file review was granted by the Behavioural Research Ethics Board of the University of British Columbia, the Program Evaluation and Research (PER) Ethics Board of YFPS (see Appendix C), and by the Senior Executive Director, Provincial Services, Ministry of Children and Family Development (see Appendix D). As part of the assessment process at YFPS, youths provided consent to allow their information to be used for any and all research projects approved by the PER Ethics Board. As a result of subsequent approvals, available closed files of female youth with a history of violent offending were reviewed. The YFPS PER department identified a large number of female youth files from two previous studies conducted by the PER department and a third study which they are currently conducting. The final sample consisted of 145 female youth offenders who were between the ages of 12 to 18 at the time of their index offense (M = 15.5, SD = 1.3). The vast majority of files were quite detailed and included information from a variety of sources including police records (e.g., previous charges and convictions, police circumstances, detailed narratives, witness and offender statements), court 29

ecords, school records, medical records, psychiatric and psychological assessments, psychosocial histories, social services records, and reports from probation officers. 2.2 Measures 2.2.1 Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version The PCL:YV was used to assess the presence of psychopathic traits in the sample. It is a 20-item measure in which each item is scored on a three-point scale (0 = item does not apply, 1 = item applies somewhat, 2 = item definitely applies) based on the symptom`s pervasiveness, severity, and chronicity. Total scores range from 0 to 40 (two-factor and four-facet models) and 0 to 26 (three-factor model) and can be prorated in cases where five or fewer items are omitted due to a lack of information. Higher scores are indicative of a greater number and/or severity of psychopathic characteristics. Unlike its adult counterpart, no diagnostic cut score is provided, however, for research purposes, 30 is the suggested cut score to indicate the presence of psychopathic traits in youth when using the two-factor and four-facet model. A cut off score for the three-factor model has not yet been established. Evidence is present for an overall lower prevalence rate of psychopathy in female offenders than in male offenders (Jackson et al., 2002; Salekin, Rogers, Ustad, & Sewell, 1998). This fact often leads to a debate on lowering the cut score for female offenders. Some have found evidence that a lower PCL – R cut score (≥ 25 rather than ≥ 30) discriminates well between psychopaths and non-psychopaths (Jackson et al., 2002). The PCL:YV’s interrater reliability (ICC of .90-.96), internal consistency (α = .85- 30

2 Method<br />

2.1 Sample<br />

The current sample was composed <strong>of</strong> female adolescents referred to Youth<br />

Forensic Psychiatric Services (YFPS) in British Columbia. YFPS provides assessment<br />

<strong>an</strong>d treatment services to justice-involved youth, aged 12-17 at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>of</strong>fence.<br />

Assessments are conducted by a multidisciplinary team, including, psychologists,<br />

psychiatrists, psychiatric social workers, <strong>an</strong>d psychiatric nurses. Under Tri-Council<br />

guidelines, permission for file review was gr<strong>an</strong>ted by <strong>the</strong> Behavioural Research Ethics<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> British Columbia, <strong>the</strong> Program Evaluation <strong>an</strong>d Research<br />

(PER) Ethics Board <strong>of</strong> YFPS (see Appendix C), <strong>an</strong>d by <strong>the</strong> Senior Executive Director,<br />

Provincial Services, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Children <strong>an</strong>d Family Development (see Appendix D). As<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assessment process at YFPS, youths provided consent to allow <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

information to be used for <strong>an</strong>y <strong>an</strong>d all research projects approved by <strong>the</strong> PER Ethics<br />

Board. As a result <strong>of</strong> subsequent approvals, available closed files <strong>of</strong> female youth with a<br />

history <strong>of</strong> violent <strong>of</strong>fending were reviewed.<br />

The YFPS PER department identified a large number <strong>of</strong> female youth files from<br />

two previous studies conducted by <strong>the</strong> PER department <strong>an</strong>d a third study which <strong>the</strong>y<br />

are currently conducting. The final sample consisted <strong>of</strong> 145 female youth <strong>of</strong>fenders who<br />

were between <strong>the</strong> ages <strong>of</strong> 12 to 18 at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir index <strong>of</strong>fense (M = 15.5, SD =<br />

1.3). The vast majority <strong>of</strong> files were quite detailed <strong>an</strong>d included information from a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> sources including police records (e.g., previous charges <strong>an</strong>d convictions,<br />

police circumst<strong>an</strong>ces, detailed narratives, witness <strong>an</strong>d <strong>of</strong>fender statements), court<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!