an examination of the factor structure of the psychopathy checklist
an examination of the factor structure of the psychopathy checklist an examination of the factor structure of the psychopathy checklist
2 Method 2.1 Sample The current sample was composed of female adolescents referred to Youth Forensic Psychiatric Services (YFPS) in British Columbia. YFPS provides assessment and treatment services to justice-involved youth, aged 12-17 at the time of their offence. Assessments are conducted by a multidisciplinary team, including, psychologists, psychiatrists, psychiatric social workers, and psychiatric nurses. Under Tri-Council guidelines, permission for file review was granted by the Behavioural Research Ethics Board of the University of British Columbia, the Program Evaluation and Research (PER) Ethics Board of YFPS (see Appendix C), and by the Senior Executive Director, Provincial Services, Ministry of Children and Family Development (see Appendix D). As part of the assessment process at YFPS, youths provided consent to allow their information to be used for any and all research projects approved by the PER Ethics Board. As a result of subsequent approvals, available closed files of female youth with a history of violent offending were reviewed. The YFPS PER department identified a large number of female youth files from two previous studies conducted by the PER department and a third study which they are currently conducting. The final sample consisted of 145 female youth offenders who were between the ages of 12 to 18 at the time of their index offense (M = 15.5, SD = 1.3). The vast majority of files were quite detailed and included information from a variety of sources including police records (e.g., previous charges and convictions, police circumstances, detailed narratives, witness and offender statements), court 29
ecords, school records, medical records, psychiatric and psychological assessments, psychosocial histories, social services records, and reports from probation officers. 2.2 Measures 2.2.1 Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version The PCL:YV was used to assess the presence of psychopathic traits in the sample. It is a 20-item measure in which each item is scored on a three-point scale (0 = item does not apply, 1 = item applies somewhat, 2 = item definitely applies) based on the symptom`s pervasiveness, severity, and chronicity. Total scores range from 0 to 40 (two-factor and four-facet models) and 0 to 26 (three-factor model) and can be prorated in cases where five or fewer items are omitted due to a lack of information. Higher scores are indicative of a greater number and/or severity of psychopathic characteristics. Unlike its adult counterpart, no diagnostic cut score is provided, however, for research purposes, 30 is the suggested cut score to indicate the presence of psychopathic traits in youth when using the two-factor and four-facet model. A cut off score for the three-factor model has not yet been established. Evidence is present for an overall lower prevalence rate of psychopathy in female offenders than in male offenders (Jackson et al., 2002; Salekin, Rogers, Ustad, & Sewell, 1998). This fact often leads to a debate on lowering the cut score for female offenders. Some have found evidence that a lower PCL – R cut score (≥ 25 rather than ≥ 30) discriminates well between psychopaths and non-psychopaths (Jackson et al., 2002). The PCL:YV’s interrater reliability (ICC of .90-.96), internal consistency (α = .85- 30
- Page 1 and 2: AN EXAMINATION OF THE FACTOR STRUCT
- Page 3 and 4: Preface Ethics approval for this re
- Page 5 and 6: 3 Results .........................
- Page 7 and 8: List of Tables Table 1 Confirmatory
- Page 9 and 10: Acknowledgements I owe my deepest g
- Page 11 and 12: To my family and friends, Thank you
- Page 13 and 14: among female youth populations, the
- Page 15 and 16: Third, it has been suggested that t
- Page 17 and 18: only a small proportion of conduct-
- Page 19 and 20: irresponsible, and antisocial tende
- Page 21 and 22: A long line of research has demonst
- Page 23 and 24: females. When a model is considered
- Page 25 and 26: to do with whether the measure is w
- Page 27 and 28: Understanding the factor structure
- Page 29 and 30: (Leschied et al., 2001; Moretti, Ca
- Page 31 and 32: psychopathic offenders were signifi
- Page 33 and 34: instrumental aggression. However, w
- Page 35 and 36: Given the relationships between the
- Page 37 and 38: associated with self-report will be
- Page 39: 1.4.1 Hypotheses The current thesis
- Page 43 and 44: 2.2.3 Instrumental-Reactive Coding
- Page 45 and 46: eceiving services from YFPS. Althou
- Page 47 and 48: 3 Results 3.1 Coding Reliability In
- Page 49 and 50: This was followed by acquaintance v
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 2. Percentage of cases by se
- Page 53 and 54: index that adjusts for model comple
- Page 55 and 56: Item 1 Item 2 Item 4 Item 5 Item 6
- Page 57 and 58: (1-19), 38.7% scored in the moderat
- Page 59 and 60: offences, 28.6% were for revenge or
- Page 61 and 62: association between the dichotomous
- Page 63 and 64: from the original dataset. In other
- Page 65 and 66: in instrumental aggression was acco
- Page 67 and 68: etween the dichotomous psychopathy
- Page 69 and 70: psychopath based on a cut score of
- Page 71 and 72: the three-factor model was unable t
- Page 73 and 74: sample since violent offenders are
- Page 75 and 76: who also concluded that antisocial
- Page 77 and 78: they are less likely to use reactiv
- Page 79 and 80: more strongly related to instrument
- Page 81 and 82: Pickard, 2007; Barry, Pickard, & An
- Page 83 and 84: measure of psychopathy may be limit
- Page 85 and 86: Further, based on the relatively lo
- Page 87 and 88: score. Although this is a valid mea
- Page 89 and 90: Having access to a large sample, we
2 Method<br />
2.1 Sample<br />
The current sample was composed <strong>of</strong> female adolescents referred to Youth<br />
Forensic Psychiatric Services (YFPS) in British Columbia. YFPS provides assessment<br />
<strong>an</strong>d treatment services to justice-involved youth, aged 12-17 at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>of</strong>fence.<br />
Assessments are conducted by a multidisciplinary team, including, psychologists,<br />
psychiatrists, psychiatric social workers, <strong>an</strong>d psychiatric nurses. Under Tri-Council<br />
guidelines, permission for file review was gr<strong>an</strong>ted by <strong>the</strong> Behavioural Research Ethics<br />
Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> British Columbia, <strong>the</strong> Program Evaluation <strong>an</strong>d Research<br />
(PER) Ethics Board <strong>of</strong> YFPS (see Appendix C), <strong>an</strong>d by <strong>the</strong> Senior Executive Director,<br />
Provincial Services, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Children <strong>an</strong>d Family Development (see Appendix D). As<br />
part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assessment process at YFPS, youths provided consent to allow <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
information to be used for <strong>an</strong>y <strong>an</strong>d all research projects approved by <strong>the</strong> PER Ethics<br />
Board. As a result <strong>of</strong> subsequent approvals, available closed files <strong>of</strong> female youth with a<br />
history <strong>of</strong> violent <strong>of</strong>fending were reviewed.<br />
The YFPS PER department identified a large number <strong>of</strong> female youth files from<br />
two previous studies conducted by <strong>the</strong> PER department <strong>an</strong>d a third study which <strong>the</strong>y<br />
are currently conducting. The final sample consisted <strong>of</strong> 145 female youth <strong>of</strong>fenders who<br />
were between <strong>the</strong> ages <strong>of</strong> 12 to 18 at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir index <strong>of</strong>fense (M = 15.5, SD =<br />
1.3). The vast majority <strong>of</strong> files were quite detailed <strong>an</strong>d included information from a<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> sources including police records (e.g., previous charges <strong>an</strong>d convictions,<br />
police circumst<strong>an</strong>ces, detailed narratives, witness <strong>an</strong>d <strong>of</strong>fender statements), court<br />
29