- Page 1 and 2:
AN EXAMINATION OF THE FACTOR STRUCT
- Page 3 and 4:
Preface Ethics approval for this re
- Page 5 and 6:
3 Results .........................
- Page 7 and 8:
List of Tables Table 1 Confirmatory
- Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgements I owe my deepest g
- Page 11 and 12:
To my family and friends, Thank you
- Page 13 and 14:
among female youth populations, the
- Page 15 and 16:
Third, it has been suggested that t
- Page 17 and 18:
only a small proportion of conduct-
- Page 19 and 20:
irresponsible, and antisocial tende
- Page 21 and 22:
A long line of research has demonst
- Page 23 and 24:
females. When a model is considered
- Page 25 and 26:
to do with whether the measure is w
- Page 27 and 28:
Understanding the factor structure
- Page 29 and 30:
(Leschied et al., 2001; Moretti, Ca
- Page 31 and 32:
psychopathic offenders were signifi
- Page 33 and 34:
instrumental aggression. However, w
- Page 35 and 36:
Given the relationships between the
- Page 37 and 38:
associated with self-report will be
- Page 39 and 40:
1.4.1 Hypotheses The current thesis
- Page 41 and 42:
ecords, school records, medical rec
- Page 43 and 44:
2.2.3 Instrumental-Reactive Coding
- Page 45 and 46:
eceiving services from YFPS. Althou
- Page 47 and 48:
3 Results 3.1 Coding Reliability In
- Page 49 and 50:
This was followed by acquaintance v
- Page 51 and 52:
Figure 2. Percentage of cases by se
- Page 53 and 54:
index that adjusts for model comple
- Page 55 and 56:
Item 1 Item 2 Item 4 Item 5 Item 6
- Page 57 and 58:
(1-19), 38.7% scored in the moderat
- Page 59 and 60:
offences, 28.6% were for revenge or
- Page 61 and 62:
association between the dichotomous
- Page 63 and 64:
from the original dataset. In other
- Page 65 and 66:
in instrumental aggression was acco
- Page 67 and 68:
etween the dichotomous psychopathy
- Page 69 and 70:
psychopath based on a cut score of
- Page 71 and 72:
the three-factor model was unable t
- Page 73 and 74: sample since violent offenders are
- Page 75 and 76: who also concluded that antisocial
- Page 77 and 78: they are less likely to use reactiv
- Page 79 and 80: more strongly related to instrument
- Page 81 and 82: Pickard, 2007; Barry, Pickard, & An
- Page 83 and 84: measure of psychopathy may be limit
- Page 85 and 86: Further, based on the relatively lo
- Page 87 and 88: score. Although this is a valid mea
- Page 89 and 90: Having access to a large sample, we
- Page 91 and 92: demonstrated, the utility of differ
- Page 93 and 94: malleable youth sample may facilita
- Page 95 and 96: Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: I
- Page 97 and 98: Gender differences in mental health
- Page 99 and 100: Edens, J. F., Skeem, J. L., Cruise,
- Page 101 and 102: Frick, P. J., Cornell, A. H., Barry
- Page 103 and 104: Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2006
- Page 105 and 106: Jones, S., Cauffman, E., Miller, J.
- Page 107 and 108: Lynam, D. R. (1996). Early identifi
- Page 109 and 110: Murrie, D. C., Cornell, D. G., Kapl
- Page 111 and 112: of the official and self-reported h
- Page 113 and 114: Salekin, R. T., Rogers, R., & Sewel
- Page 115 and 116: Stockdale, K. C., Olver, M. E., Won
- Page 117 and 118: Vitale, J. E., & Newman, J. P. (200
- Page 119 and 120: Xie, H., Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B
- Page 121 and 122: Appendix B: Factor Models Table A1
- Page 123: 112
- Page 127 and 128: PART A: OFFENCE CHARACTERISTICS AND
- Page 129 and 130: PART C: WOODWORTH & PORTER`S INSTRU