an examination of the factor structure of the psychopathy checklist

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix C: YFPS Ethics Approval 111
112
Page 1 and 2:
AN EXAMINATION OF THE FACTOR STRUCT
Page 3 and 4:
Preface Ethics approval for this re
Page 5 and 6:
3 Results .........................
Page 7 and 8:
List of Tables Table 1 Confirmatory
Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgements I owe my deepest g
Page 11 and 12:
To my family and friends, Thank you
Page 13 and 14:
among female youth populations, the
Page 15 and 16:
Third, it has been suggested that t
Page 17 and 18:
only a small proportion of conduct-
Page 19 and 20:
irresponsible, and antisocial tende
Page 21 and 22:
A long line of research has demonst
Page 23 and 24:
females. When a model is considered
Page 25 and 26:
to do with whether the measure is w
Page 27 and 28:
Understanding the factor structure
Page 29 and 30:
(Leschied et al., 2001; Moretti, Ca
Page 31 and 32:
psychopathic offenders were signifi
Page 33 and 34:
instrumental aggression. However, w
Page 35 and 36:
Given the relationships between the
Page 37 and 38:
associated with self-report will be
Page 39 and 40:
1.4.1 Hypotheses The current thesis
Page 41 and 42:
ecords, school records, medical rec
Page 43 and 44:
2.2.3 Instrumental-Reactive Coding
Page 45 and 46:
eceiving services from YFPS. Althou
Page 47 and 48:
3 Results 3.1 Coding Reliability In
Page 49 and 50:
This was followed by acquaintance v
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 2. Percentage of cases by se
Page 53 and 54:
index that adjusts for model comple
Page 55 and 56:
Item 1 Item 2 Item 4 Item 5 Item 6
Page 57 and 58:
(1-19), 38.7% scored in the moderat
Page 59 and 60:
offences, 28.6% were for revenge or
Page 61 and 62:
association between the dichotomous
Page 63 and 64:
from the original dataset. In other
Page 65 and 66:
in instrumental aggression was acco
Page 67 and 68:
etween the dichotomous psychopathy
Page 69 and 70:
psychopath based on a cut score of
Page 71 and 72: the three-factor model was unable t
Page 73 and 74: sample since violent offenders are
Page 75 and 76: who also concluded that antisocial
Page 77 and 78: they are less likely to use reactiv
Page 79 and 80: more strongly related to instrument
Page 81 and 82: Pickard, 2007; Barry, Pickard, & An
Page 83 and 84: measure of psychopathy may be limit
Page 85 and 86: Further, based on the relatively lo
Page 87 and 88: score. Although this is a valid mea
Page 89 and 90: Having access to a large sample, we
Page 91 and 92: demonstrated, the utility of differ
Page 93 and 94: malleable youth sample may facilita
Page 95 and 96: Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: I
Page 97 and 98: Gender differences in mental health
Page 99 and 100: Edens, J. F., Skeem, J. L., Cruise,
Page 101 and 102: Frick, P. J., Cornell, A. H., Barry
Page 103 and 104: Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2006
Page 105 and 106: Jones, S., Cauffman, E., Miller, J.
Page 107 and 108: Lynam, D. R. (1996). Early identifi
Page 109 and 110: Murrie, D. C., Cornell, D. G., Kapl
Page 111 and 112: of the official and self-reported h
Page 113 and 114: Salekin, R. T., Rogers, R., & Sewel
Page 115 and 116: Stockdale, K. C., Olver, M. E., Won
Page 117 and 118: Vitale, J. E., & Newman, J. P. (200
Page 119 and 120: Xie, H., Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B
Page 121: Appendix B: Factor Models Table A1
Page 125 and 126: Appendix E: Coding Scheme and Guide
Page 127 and 128: PART A: OFFENCE CHARACTERISTICS AND
Page 129 and 130: PART C: WOODWORTH & PORTER`S INSTRU
show all

an examination of the factor structure of the psychopathy checklist

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?