an examination of the factor structure of the psychopathy checklist

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ostrov, J. M., & Keating, C. F. (2004). Gender differences in preschool aggression during free play and structured interactions: An observational study. Social Development, 13, 255-275. Pardini, D. P., Lochman, J. E., & Frick, P. J. (2003). Callous-unemotional traits and social cognitive processes among adjudicated youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 42, 364-371. Penney, S. R., & Moretti, M. M. (2007). The relation of psychopathy to concurrent aggression and antisocial behavior in high-risk adolescent girls and boys. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25, 21-41. Pepler, D. J., & Sedighdeilami, F. (1998) Aggressive girls in Canada. W-98-30E. Ottawa, Ontario: Applied Research Branch of Strategic Policy, Human Resources Development Canada. Porter, G. (2000). Detention and delinquency cases, 1988-1997. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Porter, S., Birt, A., & Boer, D. P. (2001). Investigation of the criminal and conditional release profiles of Canadian federal offenders as a function of psychopathy and age. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 647-661. Porter, S., ten Brinke, L., & Wilson, K. (2009). Crime profiles and conditional release performance of psychopathic and non-psychopathic sexual offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 109-118. Porter, S., & Woodworth, M. (2006). Psychopathy and aggression. In C. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy, (pp. 481-494). New York: Guilford Press. Porter, S., & Woodworth, M. (2007). ‘I’m sorry I did it…but he started it’: A comparison 99
of the official and self-reported homicide descriptions of psychopaths and nonpsychopaths. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 91-107. Porter, S., Woodworth, M., Earle, J., Drugge, J. & Boer, D. (2003). Characteristics of sexual homicides committed by psychopathic and non-psychopathic offenders. Law and Human Behaviour, 27, 459-470. Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310-342. Puzzanchera, C., Stahl, A. L., Finnegan, T. A., Tierney, N., & Snyder, H. N. (2003). Juvenile Court Statistics 1998. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Liu, J. (2006). The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys, Aggressive Behavior, 32, 159-171. Reise, S. P. (1999). Personality measurement issues through the eyes of IRT. In S. E. Embretson & S. L. Hershberger (Eds.), New rules of measurement: What every psychologist and educator should know, (pp. 219-241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Quinsey, V. L. (1990). A follow-up of rapists assessed in a maximum security psychiatric facility. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 435- 440. 100
Page 1 and 2:
AN EXAMINATION OF THE FACTOR STRUCT
Page 3 and 4:
Preface Ethics approval for this re
Page 5 and 6:
3 Results .........................
Page 7 and 8:
List of Tables Table 1 Confirmatory
Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgements I owe my deepest g
Page 11 and 12:
To my family and friends, Thank you
Page 13 and 14:
among female youth populations, the
Page 15 and 16:
Third, it has been suggested that t
Page 17 and 18:
only a small proportion of conduct-
Page 19 and 20:
irresponsible, and antisocial tende
Page 21 and 22:
A long line of research has demonst
Page 23 and 24:
females. When a model is considered
Page 25 and 26:
to do with whether the measure is w
Page 27 and 28:
Understanding the factor structure
Page 29 and 30:
(Leschied et al., 2001; Moretti, Ca
Page 31 and 32:
psychopathic offenders were signifi
Page 33 and 34:
instrumental aggression. However, w
Page 35 and 36:
Given the relationships between the
Page 37 and 38:
associated with self-report will be
Page 39 and 40:
1.4.1 Hypotheses The current thesis
Page 41 and 42:
ecords, school records, medical rec
Page 43 and 44:
2.2.3 Instrumental-Reactive Coding
Page 45 and 46:
eceiving services from YFPS. Althou
Page 47 and 48:
3 Results 3.1 Coding Reliability In
Page 49 and 50:
This was followed by acquaintance v
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 2. Percentage of cases by se
Page 53 and 54:
index that adjusts for model comple
Page 55 and 56:
Item 1 Item 2 Item 4 Item 5 Item 6
Page 57 and 58:
(1-19), 38.7% scored in the moderat
Page 59 and 60: offences, 28.6% were for revenge or
Page 61 and 62: association between the dichotomous
Page 63 and 64: from the original dataset. In other
Page 65 and 66: in instrumental aggression was acco
Page 67 and 68: etween the dichotomous psychopathy
Page 69 and 70: psychopath based on a cut score of
Page 71 and 72: the three-factor model was unable t
Page 73 and 74: sample since violent offenders are
Page 75 and 76: who also concluded that antisocial
Page 77 and 78: they are less likely to use reactiv
Page 79 and 80: more strongly related to instrument
Page 81 and 82: Pickard, 2007; Barry, Pickard, & An
Page 83 and 84: measure of psychopathy may be limit
Page 85 and 86: Further, based on the relatively lo
Page 87 and 88: score. Although this is a valid mea
Page 89 and 90: Having access to a large sample, we
Page 91 and 92: demonstrated, the utility of differ
Page 93 and 94: malleable youth sample may facilita
Page 95 and 96: Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: I
Page 97 and 98: Gender differences in mental health
Page 99 and 100: Edens, J. F., Skeem, J. L., Cruise,
Page 101 and 102: Frick, P. J., Cornell, A. H., Barry
Page 103 and 104: Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2006
Page 105 and 106: Jones, S., Cauffman, E., Miller, J.
Page 107 and 108: Lynam, D. R. (1996). Early identifi
Page 109: Murrie, D. C., Cornell, D. G., Kapl
Page 113 and 114: Salekin, R. T., Rogers, R., & Sewel
Page 115 and 116: Stockdale, K. C., Olver, M. E., Won
Page 117 and 118: Vitale, J. E., & Newman, J. P. (200
Page 119 and 120: Xie, H., Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B
Page 121 and 122: Appendix B: Factor Models Table A1
Page 123 and 124: 112
Page 125 and 126: Appendix E: Coding Scheme and Guide
Page 127 and 128: PART A: OFFENCE CHARACTERISTICS AND
Page 129 and 130: PART C: WOODWORTH & PORTER`S INSTRU
show all

an examination of the factor structure of the psychopathy checklist

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?