TOURISMOS is an international, multi-disciplinary, refereed (peer ...
TOURISMOS is an international, multi-disciplinary, refereed (peer ... TOURISMOS is an international, multi-disciplinary, refereed (peer ...
TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF TOURISM Volume 6, Number 1, Spring 2011, pp. 281-295 UDC: 338.48+640(050) country’s land surface. They include 28 strict nature reserves (inaccessible to tourism activity), 16 national parks or their state-level equivalents, nine managed nature reserves or wildlife sanctuaries and one protected landscape. Recent statistics reveal that nature-based activities are the fastest growing tourism product in Malaysia, and it is estimated that 10% of Malaysia’s tourism revenue in 2000 originated from ecotourism. The National Ecotourism Plan (NEP) was drafted in 1996 to assist the federal and state governments in developing Malaysia’s ecotourism potential. The Plan identifies 52 project suggestions, relating to 48 areas and four suggestions that are not site-specific. About 20 sites in Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak account for the vast majority of ecotourism by foreign and domestic tourists. The Plan is intended to serve both as an appropriate instrument within the overall sustainable development of Malaysia and the economy as a whole, and as an effective tool for conservation of natural and cultural heritage of the country. Due to proximity of most ecotourism sites to rural areas, the Rural Tourism Master Plan was subsequently drafted in 2001 to complement strategies in NEP. Prior to the NEP, the Malaysia Tourism Policy study identified ecotourism as an ancillary form of tourism, but the study did not define its relationship with other types of tourism. The policy study however was misleading in its recommendation that development policies in the natural environment were directed at accessibility, resource preservation and conservation to minimise adverse environmental impacts and it placed an undue emphasis upon infrastructure and impact reduction rather than enhancement of natural environment as a positive feedback mechanism. Therefore, this study focuses on natural destination assessment in the context of nature-based tourism to identify the existing standard of every natural tourism destination in South Kelantan. THE CASE OF SOUTH KELANTAN, MALAYSIA The State of Kelantan situated in the East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia, neighboring with Thailand in the North and the States of Perak, Terengganu and Pahang in the West and South (Figure 1). With most of the physical area in the state is still untouched, Kelantan is famous for its natural environments and cultural heritage which have influenced the development of the tourism industry to generate local economy. In line with the national policy, tourism development in Kelantan is also progressing rapidly with an increase of domestic tourist arrivals as well as international tourists. 285
Azizan Marzuki, Abdul Aziz Hussin, Badaruddin Mohamed, Abdul Ghapar Othman & Ahmad Puad Mat Som Figure 1 Location of Kelantan, Malaysia Based on the State Government data, tourist arrivals increased from 201,000 in 1984 to 1.2 million in 1995 and 4.27 million in 2004 (Statistik Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan, 2007). An income from the tourism industry to the State Government was around 8% per year during that period. Therefore, based on the potential of South Kelantan to be developed as natural tourism destination, 15 destinations (Figure 2) were selected for natural assessment as follows: 1. Taman Negara-Kuala Koh, Gua Musang. 2. Gunung Stong, Jeli. 3. Gua Gunung Reng, Jeli. 4. Gua Madu, Gua Musang. 5. Gua Cha, Gua Musang. 6. Gua Ikan, Kuala Krai. 7. Lata Renyok, Jeli. 286
- Page 235 and 236: Constantina Skanavis & Maria Sakell
- Page 237 and 238: Constantina Skanavis & Maria Sakell
- Page 239 and 240: Constantina Skanavis & Maria Sakell
- Page 241 and 242: Constantina Skanavis & Maria Sakell
- Page 243 and 244: Constantina Skanavis & Maria Sakell
- Page 245 and 246: Constantina Skanavis & Maria Sakell
- Page 247 and 248: Constantina Skanavis & Maria Sakell
- Page 249 and 250: Constantina Skanavis & Maria Sakell
- Page 252 and 253: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 254 and 255: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 256 and 257: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 258 and 259: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 260 and 261: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 262 and 263: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 264 and 265: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 266 and 267: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 268 and 269: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 270 and 271: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 272 and 273: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 274 and 275: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 276 and 277: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 278 and 279: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 280 and 281: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 282 and 283: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 284 and 285: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 288 and 289: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 290 and 291: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 292 and 293: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 294 and 295: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 296: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 299 and 300: INTRODUCTION Ibrahim Jaro Musa & Bu
- Page 301 and 302: 1nu = error term Ibrahim Jaro Musa
- Page 303 and 304: Ibrahim Jaro Musa & Buba Adamu Ndaw
- Page 305 and 306: Ibrahim Jaro Musa & Buba Adamu Ndaw
- Page 308 and 309: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 310 and 311: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 312 and 313: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 314: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 317 and 318: Athina Nella 2. Education and human
- Page 320 and 321: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 322: TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDI
- Page 325 and 326: TOURISMOS An International Multidis
- Page 327 and 328: Editors. The manuscripts submitted
- Page 329 and 330: TOURISMOS is also open to unsolicit
- Page 331 and 332: Manuscript Length Research Papers s
- Page 333 and 334: • Subsequent pages: the paper sho
<strong>TOURISMOS</strong>: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF TOURISM<br />
Volume 6, Number 1, Spring 2011, pp. 281-295<br />
UDC: 338.48+640(050)<br />
country’s l<strong>an</strong>d surface. They include 28 strict nature reserves<br />
(inaccessible to tour<strong>is</strong>m activity), 16 national parks or their state-level<br />
equivalents, nine m<strong>an</strong>aged nature reserves or wildlife s<strong>an</strong>ctuaries <strong>an</strong>d one<br />
protected l<strong>an</strong>dscape. Recent stat<strong>is</strong>tics reveal that nature-based activities<br />
are the fastest growing tour<strong>is</strong>m product in Malaysia, <strong>an</strong>d it <strong>is</strong> estimated<br />
that 10% of Malaysia’s tour<strong>is</strong>m revenue in 2000 originated from<br />
ecotour<strong>is</strong>m.<br />
The National Ecotour<strong>is</strong>m Pl<strong>an</strong> (NEP) was drafted in 1996 to ass<strong>is</strong>t<br />
the federal <strong>an</strong>d state governments in developing Malaysia’s ecotour<strong>is</strong>m<br />
potential. The Pl<strong>an</strong> identifies 52 project suggestions, relating to 48 areas<br />
<strong>an</strong>d four suggestions that are not site-specific. About 20 sites in<br />
Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah <strong>an</strong>d Sarawak account for the vast majority of<br />
ecotour<strong>is</strong>m by foreign <strong>an</strong>d domestic tour<strong>is</strong>ts. The Pl<strong>an</strong> <strong>is</strong> intended to serve<br />
both as <strong>an</strong> appropriate instrument within the overall sustainable<br />
development of Malaysia <strong>an</strong>d the economy as a whole, <strong>an</strong>d as <strong>an</strong> effective<br />
tool for conservation of natural <strong>an</strong>d cultural heritage of the country.<br />
Due to proximity of most ecotour<strong>is</strong>m sites to rural areas, the Rural<br />
Tour<strong>is</strong>m Master Pl<strong>an</strong> was subsequently drafted in 2001 to complement<br />
strategies in NEP. Prior to the NEP, the Malaysia Tour<strong>is</strong>m Policy study<br />
identified ecotour<strong>is</strong>m as <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>cillary form of tour<strong>is</strong>m, but the study did<br />
not define its relationship with other types of tour<strong>is</strong>m. The policy study<br />
however was m<strong>is</strong>leading in its recommendation that development policies<br />
in the natural environment were directed at accessibility, resource<br />
preservation <strong>an</strong>d conservation to minim<strong>is</strong>e adverse environmental impacts<br />
<strong>an</strong>d it placed <strong>an</strong> undue emphas<strong>is</strong> upon infrastructure <strong>an</strong>d impact reduction<br />
rather th<strong>an</strong> enh<strong>an</strong>cement of natural environment as a positive feedback<br />
mech<strong>an</strong><strong>is</strong>m. Therefore, th<strong>is</strong> study focuses on natural destination<br />
assessment in the context of nature-based tour<strong>is</strong>m to identify the ex<strong>is</strong>ting<br />
st<strong>an</strong>dard of every natural tour<strong>is</strong>m destination in South Kel<strong>an</strong>t<strong>an</strong>.<br />
THE CASE OF SOUTH KELANTAN, MALAYSIA<br />
The State of Kel<strong>an</strong>t<strong>an</strong> situated in the East Coast of Peninsular<br />
Malaysia, neighboring with Thail<strong>an</strong>d in the North <strong>an</strong>d the States of Perak,<br />
Terengg<strong>an</strong>u <strong>an</strong>d Pah<strong>an</strong>g in the West <strong>an</strong>d South (Figure 1). With most of<br />
the physical area in the state <strong>is</strong> still untouched, Kel<strong>an</strong>t<strong>an</strong> <strong>is</strong> famous for its<br />
natural environments <strong>an</strong>d cultural heritage which have influenced the<br />
development of the tour<strong>is</strong>m industry to generate local economy. In line<br />
with the national policy, tour<strong>is</strong>m development in Kel<strong>an</strong>t<strong>an</strong> <strong>is</strong> also<br />
progressing rapidly with <strong>an</strong> increase of domestic tour<strong>is</strong>t arrivals as well as<br />
<strong>international</strong> tour<strong>is</strong>ts.<br />
285