an investigative analysis of the psychological characteristics and job ...

an investigative analysis of the psychological characteristics and job ... an investigative analysis of the psychological characteristics and job ...

digitalknowledge.cput.ac.za
from digitalknowledge.cput.ac.za More from this publisher
05.05.2013 Views

The ideal CEl will have just the right combination of the most important personality traits, abilities and characteristics, qualifications and type of experience. It remains to be seen if such a person exists. The objective of this study, is however, not to determine the existence of such a person but to determine a profile of an ideal CEL. This will make it easier to recruit the best person for the job to satisfy the needs of the students, the student employers and the academic institution. In the following chapter the research methodology of this study will be discussed in detail. 69

CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 3.1 INTRODUCTION There will always be problems that require research for solutions. For this reason there will always be something for the researcher to investigate. These questions can be answered and problems be solved only if the researcher asks questions to solve the problems (Neuman, 2003:2). The role of research is therefore to create a method to solve problems and answer questions. All research must follow acertain plan to find answers to the questions. Walsh (2001:2) declares that real research investigation involve more than general information seeking. It involves: • Putting forward ideas that can be tested. • Collecting data to test these ideas in a systematic way. • Analysing the collected data. • Drawing conclusions based on the research evidence. According to Phillips and Pugh (1994:47), research is distinguished from information gathering and decision making by three distinct but interrelated characteristics: 3.1.1 Research as an Open System ofThought Researchers are entitled to think what they want They h"ve no hidden agendas or closed systems. They continuously test review and criticise other researchers' work. Critical thinking develops in this way. Non-researchers often regard research results as demonstrations of the obvious or as unimportant However, by investigating the obvious, a good researcher discovers elaborations that are not trivial. A good researcher is not someone who knows the right answers, but someone who is struggling to find out what the right questions might be. 70

CHAPTER THREE<br />

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY<br />

3.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

There will always be problems that require research for solutions. For this reason <strong>the</strong>re will always<br />

be something for <strong>the</strong> researcher to investigate. These questions c<strong>an</strong> be <strong>an</strong>swered <strong>an</strong>d problems be<br />

solved only if <strong>the</strong> researcher asks questions to solve <strong>the</strong> problems (Neum<strong>an</strong>, 2003:2). The role <strong>of</strong><br />

research is <strong>the</strong>refore to create a method to solve problems <strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>swer questions. All research<br />

must follow acertain pl<strong>an</strong> to find <strong>an</strong>swers to <strong>the</strong> questions.<br />

Walsh (2001:2) declares that real research investigation involve more th<strong>an</strong> general information<br />

seeking. It involves:<br />

• Putting forward ideas that c<strong>an</strong> be tested.<br />

• Collecting data to test <strong>the</strong>se ideas in a systematic way.<br />

• Analysing <strong>the</strong> collected data.<br />

• Drawing conclusions based on <strong>the</strong> research evidence.<br />

According to Phillips <strong>an</strong>d Pugh (1994:47), research is distinguished from information ga<strong>the</strong>ring <strong>an</strong>d<br />

decision making by three distinct but interrelated <strong>characteristics</strong>:<br />

3.1.1 Research as <strong>an</strong> Open System <strong>of</strong>Thought<br />

Researchers are entitled to think what <strong>the</strong>y w<strong>an</strong>t They h"ve no hidden agendas or closed<br />

systems. They continuously test review <strong>an</strong>d criticise o<strong>the</strong>r researchers' work. Critical thinking<br />

develops in this way. Non-researchers <strong>of</strong>ten regard research results as demonstrations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

obvious or as unimport<strong>an</strong>t However, by investigating <strong>the</strong> obvious, a good researcher discovers<br />

elaborations that are not trivial. A good researcher is not someone who knows <strong>the</strong> right <strong>an</strong>swers,<br />

but someone who is struggling to find out what <strong>the</strong> right questions might be.<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!