an investigative analysis of the psychological characteristics and job ...
an investigative analysis of the psychological characteristics and job ... an investigative analysis of the psychological characteristics and job ...
It was established that a process was needed to convert the masses of raw data into meaningful information. The researcher may have had many completed questionnaires, but until they were tabulated and analysed, they remained useless (Struwig &Stead, 2001:150). The first step the researcher and the statistician took was to edit and encode the data. Neuman (2003:332) advises that before a researcher examines quantitative data, he needs to put it into a different form. Struwig and Stead (2001:150) advise that the primary purpose of editing is to eliminate errors in the raw data and to place the data into categories to facilitate the tabulation and interpretation of the data. They also add that editing refers to the elimination of errors in the raw data and encoding refers to the assignment of data to appropriate categories. The different categories were established. These categories are as follows (Table 3.2): Table 3.2: Data Capturing Categories Code Category A Institution B Job Title C1 Role/Responsibility relative to students C2 Role/Responsibility relative to employers C3 RoleJResponsibility relative to the institution C4 RoleJResponsibility relative to administration D Personality Traits E Abilities and Characteristics F Qualifications G Experience After the different categories had been established, the questions and possible answers of the questionnaire were coded. Neuman (2003:332) defines coding as the systematic reorganising of raw data into a format that is machine readable. Examples of the coding can be seen in Table 3.3. 83
Table 3.3: Examples of Coding relative to students Cate 0 Role/Responsibility relative to students Code Question 01.1.1 Helps students set appropriate goals nsive to their particular needs. Code Answer F1 Daily F2 Weekly F3 Monthly F4 Annually 11 Essential 12 Very Important 13 Important 14 Not Important Personality Traits Code I Category --=:'=:0=--- -cP""""e-rs-on-a=-lity--=Tra-ci:-ts---------'::==.il..::.:L-------------.j Code 02.1 IAccuract Question Code Answer 11 Essential 12 Very Important 13 Important 14 Not Important Abilities and Characteristics Code E Code 03.1 IAbilities and Characteristics IStudent Oriented Category Question Code Answer 11 Essential 12 Very Important 13 Important 14 Not Important 84
- Page 52 and 53: to act assertively, rather than agg
- Page 54 and 55: simply from being involved in their
- Page 56 and 57: 2.3.13 Energetic The GEL should be
- Page 58 and 59: change over time and that employers
- Page 60 and 61: Graharn and Bennet (1998:114) add t
- Page 62 and 63: The GEL must have the ability to pe
- Page 64 and 65: 2.3.33 Responsible According to Rue
- Page 66 and 67: 2.3.38 Sympathetic Whitaker (1995:1
- Page 68 and 69: 2.4 ABILITIES AND CHARACTERISTICS A
- Page 70 and 71: 2.4.3 Willing to Tackle and Solve P
- Page 72 and 73: A good sense of humour can only ben
- Page 74 and 75: Communication occurs in many forms,
- Page 76 and 77: Ashcroft and Foreman-Peck (1994:30)
- Page 78 and 79: Carrel, et al. (1997:477) feel tha1
- Page 80 and 81: 2.4.19 Ability to Criticise Tactful
- Page 82 and 83: Robbins and Hunsaker (1989:34-35) a
- Page 84 and 85: Carrel, et al. (1997:489) are of th
- Page 86 and 87: The four levels of qualifications a
- Page 88 and 89: The ideal CEl will have just the ri
- Page 90 and 91: 3.1.2 Researchers Examine Data Crit
- Page 92 and 93: Therefore the objective of this stu
- Page 94 and 95: 3.3.2.4 Replication The replication
- Page 96 and 97: 3.3.2.13Validity Validity in quanti
- Page 98: • The Role and Responsibility of
- Page 101: Neuman (2003:183) identifies eight
- Page 106 and 107: was decided to use bivariate percen
- Page 108 and 109: 31% of the local respondents and 26
- Page 112 and 113: 4.2.3 Role and Responsibility Relat
- Page 114: 4.3 PERSONALITY TRAITS The responde
- Page 118 and 119: 4.6 EXPERIENCE Figure 4.7: Qualific
- Page 120: systematic way to gather and analys
- Page 123 and 124: 4.8 GUIDELINES 0 Qualifications and
- Page 125 and 126: 4.8.3 Training Comprehensive job in
- Page 127 and 128: CHAPTERS CONCLUDING REMARKS AND ARE
- Page 129 and 130: The research also indicated that th
- Page 131 and 132: REFERENCES Armstrong, M. 1996. A Ha
- Page 133: Cox, B. 1994. Practical Pointers fo
- Page 137 and 138: Meyer, M. 1999. Managing Human Reso
- Page 139 and 140: Rose, D & Sullivan, O. 1993. Introd
- Page 141: APPENDIX A DENDOGRAM: PROPOSED PROF
- Page 145 and 146: I 22 RoleJResponsibility Relative t
- Page 147 and 148: I 2.4 Role/Responsibility Relative
- Page 149 and 150: 4. CHARACTERlSnCSIABIUnES OF A SUCC
It was established that a process was needed to convert <strong>the</strong> masses <strong>of</strong> raw data into me<strong>an</strong>ingful<br />
information. The researcher may have had m<strong>an</strong>y completed questionnaires, but until <strong>the</strong>y were<br />
tabulated <strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>alysed, <strong>the</strong>y remained useless (Struwig &Stead, 2001:150).<br />
The first step <strong>the</strong> researcher <strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong> statistici<strong>an</strong> took was to edit <strong>an</strong>d encode <strong>the</strong> data. Neum<strong>an</strong><br />
(2003:332) advises that before a researcher examines qu<strong>an</strong>titative data, he needs to put it into a<br />
different form. Struwig <strong>an</strong>d Stead (2001:150) advise that <strong>the</strong> primary purpose <strong>of</strong> editing is to<br />
eliminate errors in <strong>the</strong> raw data <strong>an</strong>d to place <strong>the</strong> data into categories to facilitate <strong>the</strong> tabulation <strong>an</strong>d<br />
interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data. They also add that editing refers to <strong>the</strong> elimination <strong>of</strong> errors in <strong>the</strong> raw<br />
data <strong>an</strong>d encoding refers to <strong>the</strong> assignment <strong>of</strong> data to appropriate categories. The different<br />
categories were established. These categories are as follows (Table 3.2):<br />
Table 3.2: Data Capturing Categories<br />
Code Category<br />
A Institution<br />
B Job Title<br />
C1 Role/Responsibility relative to students<br />
C2 Role/Responsibility relative to employers<br />
C3 RoleJResponsibility relative to <strong>the</strong> institution<br />
C4 RoleJResponsibility relative to administration<br />
D Personality Traits<br />
E Abilities <strong>an</strong>d Characteristics<br />
F Qualifications<br />
G Experience<br />
After <strong>the</strong> different categories had been established, <strong>the</strong> questions <strong>an</strong>d possible <strong>an</strong>swers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
questionnaire were coded. Neum<strong>an</strong> (2003:332) defines coding as <strong>the</strong> systematic reorg<strong>an</strong>ising <strong>of</strong><br />
raw data into a format that is machine readable. Examples <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coding c<strong>an</strong> be seen in Table 3.3.<br />
83