View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal
View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal
View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Literature review<br />
Within Ixieae there are the subtribes <strong>of</strong> Ixiinae, Tritoniinae, Gladiolinae,<br />
Radinosiphon, Hesperanthinae, Melasphaerula, Babianinae, Romuleinae, Freesiinae<br />
and Anapalinae. Romulea belongs to the subtribe <strong>of</strong> Romuleinae (GOLDBLATT,<br />
1990). The other members <strong>of</strong> this subtribe are Crocus and Syringodea<br />
(GOLDBLATT, 1990).<br />
Other genera in Ixieae includes Anomatheca, Babiana, Chasmanthe, Crocosmia,<br />
Crocus, Devia, Dierama, Duthieatrum, Freesia, Geissorhiza, Gladiolus, Hesperantha,<br />
Ixia, Melasphaetula, Radinosiphon, Shizostylis, Syringodea, Tritonia, Tritonopsis and<br />
Zygotritonia (GOLDBLATT, 1990).<br />
REEVES et al. (2001) showed the close association <strong>of</strong> the two genera Romulea and<br />
Crocus. It also confirms the classification <strong>of</strong> GOLDBLATT (1990) with molecular<br />
techniques. This classification was obtained by REEVES et al. (2001) by combining<br />
sequencing work in the Iridaceae done by other studies with their own sequencing<br />
data and grouping these in a combined parsimonious tree with bootstrap<br />
percentages and Fitch weights.<br />
Maratti did a small taxonomic study on Romulea species in 1772 (DE VOS, 1972). In<br />
this work he described Romulea after a species growing in the neighbourhood <strong>of</strong><br />
Rome. He proposed that this species was distinct from Crocus, Colchicum,<br />
Sisyrinchium, Bulbocodium and Ixia (DE VOS, 1972).<br />
2.4 CONSERVATION STATUS<br />
As it is a moral duty <strong>of</strong> every scientist to be concerned about the conservation <strong>of</strong><br />
species <strong>of</strong> which they are using reproductive material harvested from the wild, a<br />
section on the conservation status <strong>of</strong> this genus is therefore included.<br />
RAIMONDO et al. (2009) list Romulea as having fewer endangered species than<br />
previous studies (HILTON-TAYLOR, 1996). Although this is explained, it does not<br />
mention the status <strong>of</strong> one attractive species listed by HILTON-TAYLOR (1996) as<br />
23