View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal
View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal
View/Open - ResearchSpace - University of KwaZulu-Natal
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
List <strong>of</strong> Figures<br />
Figure 2.26: Grahamstown weather station (26° 30’ E, 33° 17’ S, 642 m above<br />
sea level) average daily minimum and maximum monthly temperatures (Error<br />
bars indicate standard error <strong>of</strong> the mean <strong>of</strong> last 5 years).<br />
Figure 2.27: Grahamstown weather station (26° 30’ E, 33° 17’ S, 642 m above<br />
sea level) average total monthly rain (Error bars indicate standard error <strong>of</strong> the<br />
mean <strong>of</strong> last 5 years).<br />
Figure 2.28: Grahamstown weather station (26° 30’ E, 33° 17’ S, 642 m above<br />
sea level) average daily relative humidity (Error bars indicate standard error <strong>of</strong><br />
the mean <strong>of</strong> last 5 years).<br />
Figure 2.29: Diagrammatic representation <strong>of</strong> a small cluster <strong>of</strong> soil illustrating<br />
the complexity <strong>of</strong> organic soil. Also note the air spaces between the various<br />
components illustrated. Modified from descriptions <strong>of</strong> SLEEMAN & BREWER<br />
(1988).<br />
Figure 2.30: A textural triangle showing the range <strong>of</strong> variation in sand, silt, and<br />
clay for each soil textural class (Modified from DONAHUE et al. (1983) and<br />
LOVELAND & WHALLEY (1991))<br />
Figure 2.31: The triphasic pattern <strong>of</strong> water uptake by germinating seeds, with<br />
arrow showing the time <strong>of</strong> radicle protrusion (BEWLEY & BLACK, 1994).<br />
Figure 3.1: The colour and structure <strong>of</strong> samples one and two. Horizontal bar =<br />
20 mm.<br />
Figure 4.1: Water content (value at day zero) and imbibition rates <strong>of</strong> seeds <strong>of</strong><br />
eight species <strong>of</strong> Romulea. Error bars indicate standard error <strong>of</strong> the mean.<br />
Figure 4.2: Scanning electron microscopic images <strong>of</strong> seeds arranged from the<br />
smallest to the largest for size comparison. Romulea leipoldtii (A); R. flava (B);<br />
R. minutiflora (C); R. sabulosa (D); R. camerooniana (E); R. rosea (F); R.<br />
diversiformis (G); R. monadelpha (H). Horizontal bar = 1 mm.<br />
Figure 4.3: Scanning electron micrographs <strong>of</strong> the seed surfaces <strong>of</strong> Romulea<br />
camerooniana (A); R. diversiformis (B); R. flava (C); R. leipoldtii (D); Romulea<br />
minutiflora (E); R. monadelpha (F); R. rosea (G) and R. sabulosa (H).<br />
Horizontal bar = 10 µm (the same magnification was used for all species).<br />
Figure 4.4: Scanning electron micrographs <strong>of</strong> the micropylar regions <strong>of</strong> seeds<br />
<strong>of</strong> Romulea camerooniana (A); R. diversiformis (B); R. flava (C); R. leipoldtii<br />
(D); R. minutiflora (E); R. monadelpha (F); R. rosea (G) and R. sabulosa (H).<br />
Horizontal bar = 20 µm.<br />
Figure 4.5: Effect <strong>of</strong> nutrients without N, P or K, plant growth promoting<br />
substances and smoke constituents on seed germination <strong>of</strong> Romulea rosea<br />
under 16 h photoperiod at 20 ± 0.5°C. A number above the standard error bar<br />
represents mean germination time and an asterisk denotes that the treatment<br />
34<br />
34<br />
34<br />
36<br />
38<br />
46<br />
95<br />
104<br />
105<br />
105<br />
106<br />
xv