04.05.2013 Views

Grammatica - loco

Grammatica - loco

Grammatica - loco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1111<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

1011<br />

1<br />

12111<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

20111<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

30111<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

40<br />

41111<br />

Ik heb er toen het brood mee gesneden.<br />

I then cut the bread with it.<br />

But note that pronominal objects go between the finite verb and er and<br />

that it is possible to put er after nominal objects (i.e. not immediately<br />

after the finite verb) if there is another word or expression which can be<br />

inserted between er and the preposition dependent on it:<br />

Ik heb het/dat er toen mee gesneden.<br />

Ik heb het brood er toen mee gesneden.<br />

Without the adverb toen one has the choice here of either leaving er and<br />

the preposition together or else, as would be more usual in speech, putting<br />

the er after the finite verb:<br />

Ik heb het brood ermee gesneden.<br />

Ik heb er het brood mee gesneden.<br />

Note however that with an indefinite direct object (i.e. in this case brood<br />

as opposed to het brood) there is a distinct preference for separating er<br />

from its preposition:<br />

Ik heb er brood mee gesneden.<br />

I cut bread with it.<br />

When the finite verb in a sentence with a pronominal er is a reflexive<br />

verb, er follows the reflexive pronoun:<br />

Ik heb me er vreselijk aan geërgerd. (zich ergeren aan)<br />

I was very irritated by it. (to be irritated by)<br />

The above constructions must not be confused with waar . . . mee etc.<br />

(see 8.5.3)<br />

Note the following complicated usage of pronominal er where it is employed<br />

with verbs that are followed by a fixed preposition, i.e. verbs that take a<br />

prepositional object (e.g. overtuigen van ‘to convince of’, denken aan ‘to<br />

think of’ etc.—see 11.16.12 and 11.21). In all the following examples the<br />

object of the first clause containing a verb that takes a prepositional object<br />

is in fact the next clause and the er + preposition pre-empts that second<br />

clause, which can be an infinitive clause (as in examples one and two) or<br />

a subordinate clause (as in example three). Acquiring a feeling for the correct<br />

use of er in these constructions is one of the most difficult aspects of<br />

Dutch grammar:<br />

Ik had er nooit aan gedacht het zo te doen.<br />

I would never have thought of doing it like that.<br />

Pronominal<br />

er<br />

369

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!