04.05.2013 Views

Grammatica - loco

Grammatica - loco

Grammatica - loco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1111<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

1011<br />

1<br />

12111<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

20111<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

30111<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

40<br />

41111<br />

Kom je vandaag of kom je morgen?<br />

Are you coming today or tomorrow?<br />

Hij heeft het beloofd doch hij heeft het niet gedaan.<br />

He promised to but he didn’t do it.<br />

12.1.1<br />

12.1.1.1<br />

Notes<br />

Note that the following English conjunctional construction with ‘and’ (i.e.<br />

‘to go and do s.t.’) is avoided in Dutch:<br />

We gingen zitten.<br />

We went and sat down.<br />

Ze gingen toen samen drop kopen.<br />

They then went and bought some licorice together.<br />

All these constructions require a double infinitive in the perfect tense (see<br />

11.9.2.5), i.e.:<br />

We zijn gaan zitten.<br />

We went and sat down.<br />

Ze zijn toen samen drop gaan kopen.<br />

They then went and bought some liquorice together.<br />

12.1.1.2<br />

The conjunction ‘for’ is rather formal in English and is usually replaced<br />

by ‘because’, but in Dutch the reverse is the case. A sentence such as ‘He<br />

dropped the cup because it was too hot’ would usually be rendered as Hij<br />

liet het kopje vallen want het was te heet, although omdat plus subordinate<br />

word order would be quite correct too. Note that just as English ‘because’<br />

cannot always be replaced by ‘for’, so omdat cannot always be replaced<br />

by want, i.e. when a compound sentence begins with the subordinate clause,<br />

then ‘because’ and omdat must be used:<br />

Omdat het kopje te heet was, liet hij het vallen.<br />

Because the cup was too hot, he dropped it.<br />

Hij liet het kopje vallen want het was te heet.<br />

Hij liet het kopje vallen omdat het te heet was.<br />

He dropped the cup because it was too hot.<br />

Co-ordinating<br />

conjunctions<br />

291

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!