04.05.2013 Views

Grammatica - loco

Grammatica - loco

Grammatica - loco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8<br />

Chapter 2<br />

Spelling<br />

Spelling<br />

As with the pronunciation, it is assumed that the reader has grasped the<br />

essentials of the highly regular spelling of Dutch (e.g. boom > bomen,<br />

huis > huizen etc.) and that there is no need to repeat them here, but even<br />

the more advanced student may need to be made aware of certain archaisms<br />

that will be encountered in books printed prior to World War II, as well<br />

as of certain recent changes to Dutch spelling. Some comments on the use<br />

of accents, apostrophes, capital letters, hyphens and medial letters in<br />

compound words are also made here.<br />

2.1<br />

Archaisms in printed matter from pre-1947<br />

There are two main differences between modern spelling and that encountered<br />

in works printed prior to the spelling reform of 1947:<br />

(a) Many words that now end in -s previously ended in -sch although they<br />

were not pronounced any differently from the way they are now:<br />

mensch ‘person’, bosch ‘forest’, Duitsch ‘German’, Nederlandsch<br />

‘Dutch’<br />

Derivatives of such words were also written with sch:<br />

menschen ‘people’, menschelijk ‘human’, boschen ‘forests’,<br />

Duitschland ‘Germany’<br />

This -sch ending, pronounced -s, has only been retained in the<br />

adjectival ending -isch which occurs in loanwords of Greek and<br />

Latin origin, e.g. cynisch, Belgisch, historisch, logisch etc.<br />

(b) Ee and oo were not only doubled in closed syllables, as they are now<br />

(e.g. been ‘leg’, boom ‘tree’), but also in open syllables in certain<br />

words; it depended on the etymology of the word whether a double

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!