Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...
Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ... Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...
4.2 Integrating municipality development indicators The same procedure and results as in the previous description of the town patterns were executed for the 32 municipalities. Table 4.4 integrates the municipal profiles on the critical development characteristics, while Table 4.5 categorises the population size classes. Table 4.6 reveals the cross-tabulations of the five Population Size classes with respectively the 32 municipalities’ Human Need classes (Table 4.6a), Development Potential classes (Table 4.6b) and Investment Types (Table 4.6c). Table 4.4: Integrated Municipal Profiles Development and Investment Name Population Need Development Need Type !Kheis Medium High Low Low Dev/High Need Social //Khara Hais Very Large Low High High Dev/Low Need Infra and Basic Dikgatlong Large High Medium Low Dev/High Need Social Emthanjeni Large Low Medium Low Dev/Low Need Basic Frances Baard Very Small High Low Low Dev/High Need Social Gamagara Large Low Medium High Dev/Low Need Infra and Basic Ga-Segonyana Very Large High High High Dev/High Need Infra and Social Hantam Medium Low Medium Low Dev/Low Need Basic Kai !Garib Large Medium Medium Transitional Infra and Social* Kamiesberg Small Medium Medium Transitional Basic* Kareeberg Very Small Medium Low Low Dev/High Need Social Karoo Hoogland Very Small Medium Medium Transitional Infra and Basic* Kgalagadi Very Small Very Low Medium High Dev/Low Need Infra and Basic Kgatelopele Medium Low Medium Low Dev/Low Need Basic KhΓi-Ma Small Low Low Low Dev/Low Need Basic Magareng Medium High Medium Low Dev/High Need Social Mier Very Small High Low Low Dev/High Need Social Moshaweng Very Large Very High High High Dev/High Need Infra and Social Nama Khoi Large Low High High Dev/Low Need Infra and Basic Namakwa Very Small Low Low Low Dev/Low Need Basic Phokwane Large High High High Dev/High Need Infra and Social Pixey Ka Seme Very Small Low Low Low Dev/Low Need Basic Renosterberg Very Small High Low Low Dev/High Need Social Richtersveld Medium Low Medium High Dev/Low Need Infra and Basic Siyancuma Large Medium Medium Transitional Infra and Social* Siyanda Very Small Low Low Low Dev/Low Need Basic Siyathemba Medium Medium Low Low Dev/High Need Social Sol Plaatje Very Large Low Very High High Dev/Low Need Infra and Basic Thembelihle Small Medium Medium Transitional Social* Tsantsabane Large Medium Medium Transitional Basic* Ubuntu Medium High Medium Low Dev/High Need Social Umsobomvu Medium High Medium High Dev/High Need Infra and Social ∗ Municipalities in the transition zone (See Figure 3.15) 83
Table 4.5: Frequencies of Municipal Population classes Category Size Range Count % Very Small 68380 4 12.5 Total 32 100.0 Number of Municipalities 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Very Small Small Medium Large Very Large Table 4.6: Cross-tabulation of Municipality Development a) Population Size and Human Need Population Size Human Needs Very Small Small Medium Large Very Large Total % Total Very Low (Best) 1 0 0 0 0 1 3.1 Low 3 1 3 3 2 12 37.5 Medium 2 2 1 3 0 8 25.0 High 3 0 4 2 1 10 31.3 Very High (Worst) 0 0 0 0 1 1 3.1 Total 9 3 8 8 4 32 100.0 % Total 28.1 9.4 25.0 25.0 12.5 100.0 b) Population Size and Development Potential Population Size Development Potential Very Small Small Medium Large Very Large Total % Total Low (Worst) 7 1 2 0 0 10 31.3 Medium 2 2 6 6 0 16 50.0 High 0 0 0 2 3 5 15.6 Very High (Best) 0 0 0 0 1 1 3.1 Total 9 3 8 8 4 32 100.0 % Total 28.1 9.4 25.0 25.0 12.5 100.0 c) Population Size and Investment Type Population Size Investment Type Very Small Small Medium Large Very Large Total % Total Basic 3 1 2 1 0 7 21.9 Basic* 0 1 0 1 0 2 6.3 Social 4 0 4 1 0 9 28.1 Social* 0 1 0 0 0 1 3.1 Infra and Social 0 0 1 1 2 4 12.5 Infra and Social* 0 0 0 2 0 2 6.3 Infra and Basic 1 0 1 2 2 6 18.8 Infra and Basic* 1 0 0 0 0 1 3.1 Total 9 3 8 8 4 32 100.0 % Total 28.1 9.4 25.0 25.0 12.5 100.0 ∗ Municipalities in the transition zone (See Figure 3.15) 84
- Page 281 and 282: Transportation and communications A
- Page 283 and 284: Racial composition (Empowerment eli
- Page 285 and 286: Table 3.5: Variables for Municipal
- Page 287 and 288: 3.6 Presenting the quantitative pro
- Page 289 and 290: 21 Kimberley 2 Victoria West 3 22 K
- Page 291 and 292: 14 Nababeep 2 Noupoort 2 Colesberg
- Page 293 and 294: Hopetown 1 1 1 High Dev/High Need J
- Page 295 and 296: Vioolsdrif 2 1 3 Transitional Vosbu
- Page 297 and 298: Kimberley 1 2 2 High Dev/Low Need K
- Page 299 and 300: Figure 3.3: Development potential i
- Page 301 and 302: Figure 3.5: Composite resources ind
- Page 303 and 304: Figure 3.7: Composite economic acti
- Page 305 and 306: Figure 3.9: Investment typology of
- Page 307 and 308: 8 Umsobomvu 2 Emthanjeni 2 Kai !Gar
- Page 309 and 310: Figure 3.10: Development potential
- Page 311 and 312: Figure 3.12: Composite resource ind
- Page 313 and 314: Figure 3.14: Composite economic ind
- Page 315 and 316: Figure 3.16: Investment typology of
- Page 317 and 318: Figure 3.18: Human needs index of t
- Page 319 and 320: 3.6.3 Temporal profiles of municipa
- Page 321 and 322: (b) SORTED ALPHABETICALLY Developme
- Page 323 and 324: Figure 3.21: Development Potential
- Page 325 and 326: 3.7 Qualitative evaluation In the m
- Page 327 and 328: Gannaput Small Agriculture Medium L
- Page 329 and 330: settlements were qualitatively cate
- Page 331: Table 4.3: Cross-tabulation of Town
- Page 335 and 336: Table 4.7: Urban Concentration Grou
- Page 337 and 338: decisions. These are: //Khara Hais,
- Page 339 and 340: Table 4.9 Cross-tabulation of Town
- Page 341 and 342: Figure 4.4: Example of a town in a
- Page 343 and 344: Figure 4.6: Example of a town in a
- Page 345 and 346: 4.5 Case study: Development profile
- Page 347 and 348: ailway line connection, as well as
- Page 349 and 350: CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMEND
- Page 351 and 352: Lutzburg Social* Kai !Garib Infra a
- Page 353 and 354: the population numbers and economic
- Page 355 and 356: elements combine to produce conditi
- Page 357 and 358: The National Spatial Development Pe
- Page 359 and 360: Krige, S., Schur, M. & Sippel, G. 1
- Page 361 and 362: Weliwita, A. & Okpala, D. 2004: Pro
- Page 363 and 364: H Louw DEBAT 0538304800 0798830410
- Page 365 and 366: Premier G de Bruin DRDLR H Louw DED
- Page 367 and 368: 3 KEY RESOLUTIONS AND ACTIONS TO BE
- Page 369 and 370: TERMS OF REFERENCE IN THE SERVICE L
- Page 371 and 372: viable and sustainable for promotin
- Page 373 and 374: D OBJECTIVES STATED IN THE APPROVED
- Page 375 and 376: NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCIAL SPATIAL DE
- Page 377 and 378: SUPPORTING MEETING DOCUMENTATION AG
- Page 379 and 380: SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTS
- Page 381 and 382: A provincial policy document that:
4.2 Integrating municipality development indicators<br />
<strong>The</strong> same procedure and results as in the previous description of the town patterns were<br />
executed for the 32 municipalities. Table 4.4 integrates the municipal profiles on the critical<br />
development characteristics, while Table 4.5 categorises the population size classes. Table 4.6<br />
reveals the cross-tabulations of the five Population Size classes with respectively the 32<br />
municipalities’ Human Need classes (Table 4.6a), <strong>Development</strong> Potential classes (Table 4.6b)<br />
and Investment Types (Table 4.6c).<br />
Table 4.4: Integrated Municipal Profiles<br />
<strong>Development</strong> and Investment<br />
Name Population Need <strong>Development</strong><br />
Need<br />
Type<br />
!Kheis Medium High Low Low Dev/High Need Social<br />
//Khara Hais Very Large Low High High Dev/Low Need Infra and Basic<br />
Dikgatlong Large High Medium Low Dev/High Need Social<br />
Emthanjeni Large Low Medium Low Dev/Low Need Basic<br />
Frances Baard Very Small High Low Low Dev/High Need Social<br />
Gamagara Large Low Medium High Dev/Low Need Infra and Basic<br />
Ga-Segonyana Very Large High High High Dev/High Need Infra and Social<br />
Hantam Medium Low Medium Low Dev/Low Need Basic<br />
Kai !Garib Large Medium Medium Transitional Infra and Social*<br />
Kamiesberg Small Medium Medium Transitional Basic*<br />
Kareeberg Very Small Medium Low Low Dev/High Need Social<br />
Karoo Hoogland Very Small Medium Medium Transitional Infra and Basic*<br />
Kgalagadi Very Small Very Low Medium High Dev/Low Need Infra and Basic<br />
Kgatelopele Medium Low Medium Low Dev/Low Need Basic<br />
KhΓi-Ma Small Low Low Low Dev/Low Need Basic<br />
Magareng Medium High Medium Low Dev/High Need Social<br />
Mier Very Small High Low Low Dev/High Need Social<br />
Moshaweng Very Large Very High High High Dev/High Need Infra and Social<br />
Nama Khoi Large Low High High Dev/Low Need Infra and Basic<br />
Namakwa Very Small Low Low Low Dev/Low Need Basic<br />
Phokwane Large High High High Dev/High Need Infra and Social<br />
Pixey Ka Seme Very Small Low Low Low Dev/Low Need Basic<br />
Renosterberg Very Small High Low Low Dev/High Need Social<br />
Richtersveld Medium Low Medium High Dev/Low Need Infra and Basic<br />
Siyancuma Large Medium Medium Transitional Infra and Social*<br />
Siyanda Very Small Low Low Low Dev/Low Need Basic<br />
Siyathemba Medium Medium Low Low Dev/High Need Social<br />
Sol Plaatje Very Large Low Very High High Dev/Low Need Infra and Basic<br />
<strong>The</strong>mbelihle Small Medium Medium Transitional Social*<br />
Tsantsabane Large Medium Medium Transitional Basic*<br />
Ubuntu Medium High Medium Low Dev/High Need Social<br />
Umsobomvu Medium High Medium High Dev/High Need Infra and Social<br />
∗ Municipalities in the transition zone (See Figure 3.15)<br />
83