03.05.2013 Views

Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...

Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...

Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.7 Qualitative evaluation<br />

In the methodology for any study on the growth potential of urban areas, the qualitative selfevaluation<br />

is instrumental in determining a comprehensive town profile, complementary to<br />

the quantitative profiles. In such a qualitative analysis the subjective perceptions of the town’s<br />

role-players are acknowledged. <strong>The</strong> main objective of such a self-evaluation process is to<br />

obtain the opinions of the local communities regarding the growth potential and sense of place<br />

of their towns. This implies that data had to be collected in a manner that would highlight the<br />

perceptions and general qualitative impressions of urban growth potential in what are<br />

generally referred to as “soft” indicators. <strong>The</strong>se indicators represent local perceptions of what<br />

makes a town unique, its basis for existence (raison d'être), the sense of place that makes<br />

people “feel at home” and the “vibe” that generates or restricts economic activity. A<br />

questionnaire was therefore structured according to a participatory research approach to solicit<br />

the opinions of local inhabitants. <strong>The</strong> focus was on local input from the respective leaders in<br />

each of the 32 municipalities. <strong>The</strong> questionnaire and covering letter/guidelines are included as<br />

Addendum 5. It was distributed to all 32 Municipal Managers who had to ensure that the<br />

relevant stake-holders were involved.<br />

<strong>The</strong> general level of response was, with a few exceptions, of a low standard. After several<br />

reminders and follow-up actions, only 26 of the 32 municipal questionnaires were returned –<br />

from these only a small minority were completed in full. As a result of this poor response, the<br />

results only offered a minimal opportunity to be incorporated in the evaluating process. In<br />

follow-up stages of this study, the self-evaluation questionnaires should be combined with on<br />

site visits and personal interviews at each municipality. As it is now, most municipalities<br />

missed the opportunity to evaluate themselves and to highlight their town’s strong points for<br />

future development. In this way they can be exposed to the stark realities of economic growth<br />

and human development needs that exist in their urban environments.<br />

76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!