03.05.2013 Views

Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...

Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...

Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

at a sustainable and powerful rate in line with the capacity of their resources and to operate as<br />

service providers to a relatively extensive hinterland. <strong>The</strong> difference between ‘High’ and<br />

‘Very High’ status only lies in the diversity and intensity of the town dynamics. <strong>The</strong> meaning<br />

of “High” on the <strong>Development</strong> Potential scale and on the Human Needs scale respectively<br />

should be interpreted in a reciprocal way.<br />

<strong>The</strong> final integration of the towns’ ‘development potential’ and ‘human needs’ indices in<br />

investment groups are presented in Figure 3.8 and 3.9. On the first diagram the <strong>Development</strong><br />

Potential and Human Needs scores were superimposed and plotted on a scatter diagram and<br />

the five typologies mapped spatially in Figure 3.9. This exercise led to a fivefold typology of<br />

the towns according to the integrated development and needs performance in the four<br />

quadrants and central grey base of the diagram. An investment type could be coupled with<br />

each town, applied to the quadrant that would best stimulate Infrastructure Capital and Social<br />

Capital investment. This is in line with the National <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Perspective (NSDP)<br />

and the <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Cape</strong> PGDS guidelines in this regard. Table 3.7 summarise the results of the<br />

individual towns statistically. <strong>The</strong>se visuals integrate the needs and development<br />

performances in a combined image by presenting it in both diagrammatic and map formats.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se investment typologies represent the climax of the quantitative analysis.<br />

Table 3.6: Ranks and map classes of composite indices of towns<br />

Town Ranks (Best to Worst)<br />

Human Needs <strong>Development</strong> Potential<br />

Rank Town Class Town Class<br />

1 Koingnaas 1 Kimberley 1<br />

2 Kleinzee 1 Upington 1<br />

3 Alexander Bay 1 Kuruman 2<br />

4 Kathu 1 Springbok 2<br />

5 Aggeneys 1 Hartswater 2<br />

6 Lime Acres 1 Kathu 2<br />

7 Groblershoop 1 Ritchie 2<br />

8 Orania 1 Colesberg 2<br />

9 Blackrock 1 De Aar 2<br />

10 Hondeklip Bay 1 Jan Kempdorp 2<br />

11 Springbok 2 Pampierstad 2<br />

12 Ulco 2 Calvinia 2<br />

13 Carolusberg 2 Orania 2<br />

14 Port Nolloth 2 Douglas 2<br />

15 Hotazel 2 Hopetown 2<br />

16 Okiep 2 Noupoort 2<br />

17 Vanderkloof 2 Groblershoop 2<br />

18 Sanddrif 2 Barkly West 3<br />

19 Nababeep 2 Warrenton 3<br />

20 Danielskuil 2 Kleinzee 3<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!