Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...
Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ... Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...
3.4 Change Indices for Municipalities As mentioned previously, it was not possible to compute temporal change indices for the full complement of indicators. Consequently, change is measured on 27 variables, combined to four indicators, namely Human Resources, Economic Sectors, Market Size and Human Development Needs. The Human Resources, Economic Sectors and Market Potential is combined to obtain a composite Development Potential Index, representing the counterpart for the Human Needs Index. In most cases variables measure change between 2001 and 2007. Table 3.5 contains details regarding the specific variables used to create the change indices for the municipalities. The table provides a brief explanation of the data sources and statistical procedures used to generate each of the 27 variables. Human Resources Change: This index consists of three variables measuring change between 2001 and 2007 in the total size and quality of the labour force. These change variables are computed from the variables used for the cross-sectional profiles of municipalities in 2001 and 2007. Economic Sector Change: Five variables were used to compute this index. Four of these (Sector Diversity, Primary and Tertiary workforces) are similar to those used for the 2007 municipal profiles. Temporal data for Gross Value Added values were not available. This variable is replaced by change in the value of total annual retail sales between 2000 and 2007. Market Potential Change: The size of markets was measured by two variables. These are measures of population size and total gross personal income of the inhabitants of local municipalities between 2001 and 2007. The accessibility measures are not incorporated as physical distances to metropolitan markets are invariant over time. Human Development Needs Change: Seventeen of the original nineteen variables used in the measurement for towns were used to measure change in the human needs levels of municipalities between 2001 and 2007. The two variables not included are the Matriculation pass rate and the Minimum Level of Living index. Apart from these all the change variables are based on the data from the 2001 and 2007 census and community surveys. 35
Table 3.5: Variables for Municipal Change Indices (2001 – 2007) URBAN GROWTH POTENTIAL Human resources change Nr Derivation methods and data sources Change in size of labour 1 % Change in total size of the labour force (2001-2007) force Change in quality of labour 2 % Point change in labour force (Population >15 < 65 years with force education levels equal or better than Grade 12 as percentage of total labour force (2001-2007) 3 % Point change in white collar workers (2001–2007) Economic sectoral change Nr Derivation methods and data sources Change in strength of 1 % Change in Diversity/Concentration Index (2001 - 2007) primary and tertiary economic sectors 2 % Point change of workforce in Primary activities (2001-2007) 3 % Point change of workforce in Mining activities (2001-2007) 36 4 % Point change of workforce in Financial services (2001-2007) 5 % Change in per capita total annual value of Retail Sales (2000- 2007) Market potential change Nr Derivation methods and data sources Size of local population 1 Change in number of people per municipality (2001-2007) Size of local personal income 2 % Change in average Rand value of personal monthly income (2001-2007) HUMAN DEVELOPMENT NEEDS Nr Derivation methods and data sources Racial composition 1 % Point change in black and coloured population (2001-2007) (Empowerment eligibility) Family stability 2 % Point change in female household heads (2001-2007) Age (Dependency) 3 % Point change in < 10 years old (2001-2007) 4 % Point change > 60 years old (2001-2007) Education (Employability) 5 % Point change > 20 years old with primary education only (2001-2007) Income (Welfare) 6 % Point change in average per capita personal income (Rand) (2001-2007) 7 % Point change in population receiving social grants (2007- 2010) Occupation (Employability) 8 % Point change in unskilled workers (2001-2007) Dependency ratios 9 % Point change in unemployed (as proportion of labour force) (2001-2007) Labour dependency ratios 10 % Point change in total number of persons supported by every person in the labour force, excluding him or himself.(2001-2007)
- Page 233 and 234: NATIONAL/PROVINCIAL AREAS OF OVERLA
- Page 235 and 236: BASIS FOR FORMULATION OF PROPOSALS
- Page 237 and 238: 6. ENHANCING OPPORTUNITIES FOR & MA
- Page 239 and 240: CONCLUSION PSDF provides for the fo
- Page 241 and 242: VOLUME 1 CONTEXT & OVER‐ARCHING P
- Page 243 and 244: CLOSURE Provincial Spatial Developm
- Page 245 and 246: CONTENTS Maps…………………
- Page 247 and 248: MAPS Figure 1.1 Research agenda ...
- Page 249 and 250: ADDENDA 1. Data Matrix 1.1 Town pro
- Page 251 and 252: struggling to survive - to the detr
- Page 253 and 254: CHAPTER 2 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: INS
- Page 255 and 256: • Social Capital concerns investm
- Page 257 and 258: It is now widely recognised that an
- Page 259 and 260: 2.1.3 Criteria influencing growth a
- Page 261 and 262: for the economic activities of a to
- Page 263 and 264: Africa is not unique. The NSDP (200
- Page 265 and 266: • Future economic growth should p
- Page 267 and 268: different. The NSDP argues that the
- Page 269 and 270: following empirical analysis of tow
- Page 271 and 272: Figure 3.1: Towns and administrativ
- Page 273 and 274: Table 3.1: List of towns and munici
- Page 275 and 276: 97 Griekwastad Siyancuma Pixley Ka
- Page 277 and 278: Table 3.3: Summary of indicator gro
- Page 279 and 280: generating jobs and income such as
- Page 281 and 282: Transportation and communications A
- Page 283: Racial composition (Empowerment eli
- Page 287 and 288: 3.6 Presenting the quantitative pro
- Page 289 and 290: 21 Kimberley 2 Victoria West 3 22 K
- Page 291 and 292: 14 Nababeep 2 Noupoort 2 Colesberg
- Page 293 and 294: Hopetown 1 1 1 High Dev/High Need J
- Page 295 and 296: Vioolsdrif 2 1 3 Transitional Vosbu
- Page 297 and 298: Kimberley 1 2 2 High Dev/Low Need K
- Page 299 and 300: Figure 3.3: Development potential i
- Page 301 and 302: Figure 3.5: Composite resources ind
- Page 303 and 304: Figure 3.7: Composite economic acti
- Page 305 and 306: Figure 3.9: Investment typology of
- Page 307 and 308: 8 Umsobomvu 2 Emthanjeni 2 Kai !Gar
- Page 309 and 310: Figure 3.10: Development potential
- Page 311 and 312: Figure 3.12: Composite resource ind
- Page 313 and 314: Figure 3.14: Composite economic ind
- Page 315 and 316: Figure 3.16: Investment typology of
- Page 317 and 318: Figure 3.18: Human needs index of t
- Page 319 and 320: 3.6.3 Temporal profiles of municipa
- Page 321 and 322: (b) SORTED ALPHABETICALLY Developme
- Page 323 and 324: Figure 3.21: Development Potential
- Page 325 and 326: 3.7 Qualitative evaluation In the m
- Page 327 and 328: Gannaput Small Agriculture Medium L
- Page 329 and 330: settlements were qualitatively cate
- Page 331 and 332: Table 4.3: Cross-tabulation of Town
- Page 333 and 334: Table 4.5: Frequencies of Municipal
3.4 Change Indices for Municipalities<br />
As mentioned previously, it was not possible to compute temporal change indices for the full<br />
complement of indicators. Consequently, change is measured on 27 variables, combined to<br />
four indicators, namely Human Resources, Economic Sectors, Market Size and Human<br />
<strong>Development</strong> Needs. <strong>The</strong> Human Resources, Economic Sectors and Market Potential is<br />
combined to obtain a composite <strong>Development</strong> Potential Index, representing the counterpart<br />
for the Human Needs Index. In most cases variables measure change between 2001 and 2007.<br />
Table 3.5 contains details regarding the specific variables used to create the change indices for<br />
the municipalities. <strong>The</strong> table provides a brief explanation of the data sources and statistical<br />
procedures used to generate each of the 27 variables.<br />
Human Resources Change: This index consists of three variables measuring change between<br />
2001 and 2007 in the total size and quality of the labour force. <strong>The</strong>se change variables are<br />
computed from the variables used for the cross-sectional profiles of municipalities in 2001<br />
and 2007.<br />
Economic Sector Change: Five variables were used to compute this index. Four of these<br />
(Sector Diversity, Primary and Tertiary workforces) are similar to those used for the 2007<br />
municipal profiles. Temporal data for Gross Value Added values were not available. This<br />
variable is replaced by change in the value of total annual retail sales between 2000 and 2007.<br />
Market Potential Change: <strong>The</strong> size of markets was measured by two variables. <strong>The</strong>se are<br />
measures of population size and total gross personal income of the inhabitants of local<br />
municipalities between 2001 and 2007. <strong>The</strong> accessibility measures are not incorporated as<br />
physical distances to metropolitan markets are invariant over time.<br />
Human <strong>Development</strong> Needs Change: Seventeen of the original nineteen variables used in the<br />
measurement for towns were used to measure change in the human needs levels of<br />
municipalities between 2001 and 2007. <strong>The</strong> two variables not included are the Matriculation<br />
pass rate and the Minimum Level of Living index. Apart from these all the change variables<br />
are based on the data from the 2001 and 2007 census and community surveys.<br />
35