Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...
Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ... Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...
Comment received: a) Municipalities must be encouraged to function across their boundaries in particular as it relates to the use of common resources such as the Gariep River. b) Appropriateness and efficiency of cross‐boundary (e.g. with Namibia and Botswana) agreements must be investigated. c) Municipalities must be included in formulation and establishment of cross‐border agreements (currently primarily the function of national government). 4.5 Key aspect presented: Regional development, government spending and performance management. Comment received: a) Desirability of new development should be strictly subject to the availability of resources, with specific reference to water and bulk services infrastructure. b) PSDF must reflect the importance of the envisaged solar power industry. 4.6 Key aspect presented: Enhancing opportunities for private sector investment. Comment received: a) Government must fulfil its function as land‐use co‐ordinator. b) Gaps (lack of co‐operation) exist between the different sectors active in the Northern Cape as well as between the communities. How will such entities be involved in the PSDF and future governance? c) Commercial banks must be encouraged to extend their input into LED and the benefits associated with banking charters must be used more efficiently. d) The Sustainable Development Initiative (SDI) model promoted by the //Khara Hais SDF should be adopted by the PSDF. e) Entrepreneurship and associated development opportunities must be supported. f) Legislative processes that stifle sustainable development should be identified and reviewed. g) The Karsten Women Trust should be considered as a model for public‐private partnerships. 4.7 General comment received: a) Communication between Provincial Government and municipalities pertaining to planning, land‐use, etc. must be improved. b) Brilliant presentation on a document (i.e. the PSDF) that has the potential to provide the Northern Cape with an appropriate way forward. c) Development of green energy industry tends to be hampered due to all interested parties not working together. Constructive participation of all relevant departments and stakeholders is imperative. d) Important that all district and local municipal SDFs must strive to achieve the goals and objectives of the PSDF. How they will achieve this must be clearly indicated in the lower sphere documents. e) How will the Provincial Government ensure that district and local SDFs are drafted in furtherance of the PSDF? f) Tension between Integrated Development Plans and SDFs must be addressed. g) How will comments and information received during the PSDF‐process be coordinated? 5
5 SPRINGBOK PUBLIC MEETING (23 AUG 2011): KEY ASPECTS PRESENTED AND COMMENT MADE BY PARTICIPANTS 5.1 Key aspect presented presented: Undertaking land‐use planning in terms of a standard procedure. Comment received: a) Land‐use along the coastline must be addressed in a similar manner by all relevant municipalities and stakeholders. b) Consideration should be given to designating the coastal zone as a core conservation area. c) Appropriate ecological linkages should be created between conservation areas. These should be managed for the purposes of biodiversity conservation and sustainable agriculture and tourism. 5.2 Key aspect presented: Establishment of integrated land management areas. Comment received: a) The Northern Cape incorporates the Richtersveld Botanical and Landscape World Heritage Site which sits in the heart of the Succulent Karoo Biodiversity Hotspot. PSDF must enhance long‐term sustainability of the world heritage site. b) PSDF must provide for biodiversity conservation in terms of SANBI’s ‘critical biodiversity area’ (CBA) indicators. c) Cross‐border conservation initiatives must be promoted – the merit and desirability of UNESCO biosphere reserves must be explored. 5.3 Key aspect presented: Ensuring high‐quality settlement and infrastructural development. Comment received: a) Guidelines for improvement of subsidised housing as presented must be mandatory on district and local municipalities. b) District and local SDFs should incorporate place‐specific guidelines for architecture and landscaping with specific reference to those inspired by the Nama culture and the Griqua culture. 5.4 Key aspect presented: Ensuring appropriateness of provincial, municipal and neighbourhood boundaries. Comment received: a) Appropriateness and efficiency of cross‐border arrangements with Namibia must be investigated with specific reference to the Noord‐Oewer / Vioolsdrift irrigation scheme. b) PSDF must enhance management of Richtersveld Transfrontier Conservation Area. c) Emphasis should be placed on the economic potential of tourism and the associated agencies. d) Consolidation of planning already done on the Orange River Mouth Ramsar Site and the Richtersveld Ais‐Ais Transfrontier Park. e) The Karas Region of Namibia and the Northern Cape Province share historical bonds with regard to its history, people and culture. To this end, some of the areas identified for further action are (i) the education and training sector, with the focus on ensuring that best practice is shared in skills development for economic growth, (ii) the further development of the Nama language and culture, (iii) exchange of learners’ support material and teacher development programs. 6
- Page 151 and 152: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 on 20 S
- Page 153 and 154: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Decembe
- Page 155 and 156: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 http://
- Page 157 and 158: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Map F.3
- Page 159 and 160: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 161 and 162: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 163 and 164: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 165 and 166: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Table G
- Page 167 and 168: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Reduce
- Page 169 and 170: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 171 and 172: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 strateg
- Page 173 and 174: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 175 and 176: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 3. SETT
- Page 177 and 178: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 6. KEY
- Page 179 and 180: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 H.2.2 S
- Page 181 and 182: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 183 and 184: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 185 and 186: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Pacione
- Page 187 and 188: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 189 and 190: ANNEXURE 1.1 Presentation made in K
- Page 191 and 192: ANNEXURE 3 Minutes of Project Manag
- Page 193 and 194: ANNEXURE 5 Agenda of Project Steeri
- Page 195 and 196: ANNEXURE 7 PPT Presentation (Way Fo
- Page 197 and 198: ANNEXURE 9 Northern Cape PSDF DVD
- Page 199 and 200: 2 KIMBERLEY PUBLIC MEETING (16 AUG
- Page 201: a) Educate local communities in ord
- Page 205 and 206: 6 KURUMAN PUBLIC MEETING (5 SEPTEMB
- Page 207 and 208: NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCIAL SPATIAL DE
- Page 209 and 210: AGENDA POINTS 1. Opening and backgr
- Page 211 and 212: OBJECTIVE OF MEETING Objective is t
- Page 213 and 214: CONTEXT AND STATUS OF THE PSDF PSD
- Page 215 and 216: VISION FOR THE PSDF PSDF draws upon
- Page 217 and 218: KEY ASPECTS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPM
- Page 219 and 220: PLANNING APPROACH ADOPTED PSDF prep
- Page 221 and 222: 1. LAND‐USE PLANNING Based upon a
- Page 223 and 224: CONCEPT PROVINCIAL LAND‐USE (SPC)
- Page 225 and 226: MAPPING OF SPCs & SUB‐CATEGORIES
- Page 227 and 228: 2. ENSURING HIGH QUALITY DEVELOPMEN
- Page 229 and 230: A MODEL FOR SUBSIDISED HOUSING: RES
- Page 231 and 232: 3. ESTABLISHING INTEGRATED LAND MAN
- Page 233 and 234: NATIONAL/PROVINCIAL AREAS OF OVERLA
- Page 235 and 236: BASIS FOR FORMULATION OF PROPOSALS
- Page 237 and 238: 6. ENHANCING OPPORTUNITIES FOR & MA
- Page 239 and 240: CONCLUSION PSDF provides for the fo
- Page 241 and 242: VOLUME 1 CONTEXT & OVER‐ARCHING P
- Page 243 and 244: CLOSURE Provincial Spatial Developm
- Page 245 and 246: CONTENTS Maps…………………
- Page 247 and 248: MAPS Figure 1.1 Research agenda ...
- Page 249 and 250: ADDENDA 1. Data Matrix 1.1 Town pro
- Page 251 and 252: struggling to survive - to the detr
Comment received:<br />
a) Municipalities must be encouraged to function across their boundaries in particular<br />
as it relates to the use of common resources such as the Gariep River.<br />
b) Appropriateness and efficiency of cross‐boundary (e.g. with Namibia and Botswana)<br />
agreements must be investigated.<br />
c) Municipalities must be included in formulation and establishment of cross‐border<br />
agreements (currently primarily the function of national government).<br />
4.5 Key aspect presented: Regional development, government spending and performance<br />
management.<br />
Comment received:<br />
a) Desirability of new development should be strictly subject to the availability of<br />
resources, with specific reference to water and bulk services infrastructure.<br />
b) PSDF must reflect the importance of the envisaged solar power industry.<br />
4.6 Key aspect presented: Enhancing opportunities for private sector investment.<br />
Comment received:<br />
a) Government must fulfil its function as land‐use co‐ordinator.<br />
b) Gaps (lack of co‐operation) exist between the different sectors active in the<br />
<strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Cape</strong> as well as between the communities. How will such entities be<br />
involved in the PSDF and future governance?<br />
c) Commercial banks must be encouraged to extend their input into LED and the<br />
benefits associated with banking charters must be used more efficiently.<br />
d) <strong>The</strong> Sustainable <strong>Development</strong> Initiative (SDI) model promoted by the //Khara Hais<br />
SDF should be adopted by the PSDF.<br />
e) Entrepreneurship and associated development opportunities must be supported.<br />
f) Legislative processes that stifle sustainable development should be identified and<br />
reviewed.<br />
g) <strong>The</strong> Karsten Women Trust should be considered as a model for public‐private<br />
partnerships.<br />
4.7 General comment received:<br />
a) Communication between <strong>Provincial</strong> Government and municipalities pertaining to<br />
planning, land‐use, etc. must be improved.<br />
b) Brilliant presentation on a document (i.e. the PSDF) that has the potential to<br />
provide the <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Cape</strong> with an appropriate way forward.<br />
c) <strong>Development</strong> of green energy industry tends to be hampered due to all interested<br />
parties not working together. Constructive participation of all relevant departments<br />
and stakeholders is imperative.<br />
d) Important that all district and local municipal SDFs must strive to achieve the goals<br />
and objectives of the PSDF. How they will achieve this must be clearly indicated in<br />
the lower sphere documents.<br />
e) How will the <strong>Provincial</strong> Government ensure that district and local SDFs are drafted<br />
in furtherance of the PSDF?<br />
f) Tension between Integrated <strong>Development</strong> Plans and SDFs must be addressed.<br />
g) How will comments and information received during the PSDF‐process be<br />
coordinated?<br />
5