Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...
Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ... Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...
Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 December 2011 consolidation of the economic base in the relatively better off areas. It is important to note that the HDI for the Northern Cape (0.55) is substantially below the South African figure of 0.72. From the table above it is evident that the HDI of 0.55 displays a pattern of semi‐development, and there is a definite inequality between the different population groups, with the Whites having a higher development lifestyle than the African or Coloured groups. E.2.1 POVERTY Poverty is a key problem with a high number of households living below the poverty line. Poverty cannot be measured by income alone nor can anti‐poverty measures only address income‐ enhancing measures. This necessitates a multi‐sectoral and an integrated approach (PGDS). The strategy that has proved most effective in improving economic and social well‐being consists of three elements, namely labour absorbing growth, equitable investment in education and health care and social support for poor and vulnerable groups. Social welfare policies and programs must be aimed at enabling the poor and vulnerable groups to break the cycle of poverty. Social and economic development are two inter‐dependent and mutually reinforcing processes. Equitable social development is the foundation of economic prosperity and economic growth is necessary for social development. Without social investment, economic growth will be compromised. The key challenges facing the social sector are to: • Enhance social integration and protection of the most vulnerable; and • Build a caring society through sustainable development. According to Botes (2011) 21 , two of the most frequent ways of measuring poverty is to use: • Poverty line which is the average sum of money that a household or individual needs to survive. • Poverty gap, which indicates how far a household or individual falls below the poverty line The proportion of Northern Cape people living below the poverty line has declined from 40 % in 1995 to 27 % in 2011, while the poverty gap was 11 % in 1995, compared to eight % 2011. In this regard, the province intend to halve poverty by 2015, the population living below the poverty line must stand at 20%, which means that the province is left between 2011 and 2015 to reduce poverty by 7 % (Botes, 2011). Table E.12: Percentage of people of living in poverty in the Northern Cape (Source: Global Insight, 2009 as cited in the PGDS). Region 1996 2009 Northern Cape 43.8% 42.8% John Taolo Gaetsewe 62.5% 52.8% Namaqua 32.7% 41.0% Pixley ka Seme 49.6% 44.7% Siyanda 40.5% 39.1% Frances Baard 35.2% 39.5% The table above illustrates that from 1996 to 2009, the percentage of people living in poverty only decreased by 1% but people living in poverty is still at 42, 8% which is very high. Frances Baard experienced an increase in poverty by approximately 4%. However, John Taolo Gaetsewe 21 Botes, A. 2011: Budget speech by MEC for Social Development by Alvin Botes. 5 April 2011. http://www.info.gov.za/speech/DynamicAction?pageid=461&sid=17611&tid=31597 Office of the Premier & Department of Rural Development & Land Reform 84 Dennis Moss Partnership
Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office of the Premier & Department of Rural Development & Land Reform December 2011 experienced a 9.2% decrease in poverty from 1996 to 2009. The Namaqua District experienced an 8.3%increase in poverty from 1996 to 2009. Reducing poverty is one of the key challenges for economic development. Higher levels of economic growth are a key challenge for poverty eradication. Investment in people is pivotal to redressing the poverty and vast inequalities inherited from apartheid and in addressing the rate and pattern of growth. Investment in people is also, to a large extent, about delivering social and economic infrastructure: education, welfare, health, housing, as well as transport and bulk infrastructure. Infrastructure delivery assures minimum standards and redistribution. Due to the vastness of the Northern Cape, and the remoteness of its communities in mostly rural areas, certain challenges exist regarding the implementation of projects, because delivery costs are very high and expertise and skills are scarce resources (PGDS). E.2.1.1 POVERTY ALLEVIATION FOCUS AREA The PGDS identified a number of poverty alleviation focus areas, such as: a) Inter‐Sectoral Collaboration: A Food Security and Nutrition Task Team has been formed to respond to the food crisis that vulnerable individuals and households are experiencing. b) Food Security: Providing food to the needy has led to the funding of Community Soup Kitchens and it is in collaboration with departments in the Social Sector (i.e. agriculture, education, health and water affairs, and forestry. As stated in the LED Strategy, the establishment of community food gardens is a sustainable development initiative that enhances self‐reliance. Analysis of provincial data showed that 37 food security gardens were funded with 340 beneficiaries from 2004 to 2009. c) Social Research: Livelihood analyses of communities are critical in understanding the vulnerability index of beneficiaries, the range of services and the spatial spread of interventions. d) Material Assistance: The importance of Drop‐in‐centres in providing food, clothes, emergency resources etc is another manner to alleviate poverty. A drop‐in‐centres is a physical building structure that provides a range of community services. e) Socio‐Economic Initiatives: Funds provided by the Small Enterprise Development Agency, Industrial Development Corporation and Khula could the local LED strategies on municipal level in providing poverty relief programs. f) War on Poverty Campaign: Adopted by Cabinet in 2007, it is an instrument of coordination, alignment, support and supervision of anti‐poverty initiatives in order to make as much possible impact to households and communities living in poverty in the short term, to reach 3 million households by 2014, and to eradicate poverty in the long term. It is implemented in conjunction with other government programs to ensure a coordinated and integrated approach that secures a greater impact towards alleviating poverty in communities. As a pilot project, the Northern Cape government adopted the ‘Building Healthy Families Project’ and it entails identifying the 500 poorest families in the 5 districts of the province. A comprehensive ‘anti‐poverty strategy’ has been designed to integrate and improve the current efforts to deal with the unacceptable levels of poverty in society. As part of the implementation of the Anti‐Poverty Strategy, government has developed a single central database of affected households to ensure that interventions are systematic; that individuals with the potential to lift their families out of poverty are identified and accordingly supported; and to ensure that there is a follow up on each household so that practical positive results come out of each interaction. 85 Dennis Moss Partnership
- Page 53 and 54: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 C.3.3 P
- Page 55 and 56: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Decembe
- Page 57 and 58: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Decembe
- Page 59 and 60: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Decembe
- Page 61 and 62: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Decembe
- Page 63 and 64: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Decembe
- Page 65 and 66: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 SECTION
- Page 67 and 68: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 69 and 70: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 71 and 72: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Decembe
- Page 73 and 74: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 75 and 76: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 77 and 78: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 79 and 80: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 81 and 82: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 83 and 84: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 85 and 86: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 87 and 88: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 D.3 INT
- Page 89 and 90: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 91 and 92: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 D.4 USE
- Page 93 and 94: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 D.5 REC
- Page 95 and 96: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 www.sta
- Page 97 and 98: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 99 and 100: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Decembe
- Page 101 and 102: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 103: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Decembe
- Page 107 and 108: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 E.2.3 S
- Page 109 and 110: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 North W
- Page 111 and 112: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 113 and 114: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 115 and 116: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 E.3 GEN
- Page 117 and 118: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Decembe
- Page 119 and 120: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Decembe
- Page 121 and 122: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 123 and 124: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 125 and 126: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Decembe
- Page 127 and 128: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 129 and 130: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 131 and 132: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Decembe
- Page 133 and 134: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Cape -
- Page 135 and 136: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 137 and 138: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 139 and 140: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 141 and 142: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 143 and 144: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 145 and 146: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Decembe
- Page 147 and 148: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 15 Augu
- Page 149 and 150: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Office
- Page 151 and 152: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 on 20 S
- Page 153 and 154: Northern Cape PSDF Volume 2 Decembe
<strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Cape</strong> PSDF<br />
<strong>Volume</strong> 2<br />
December 2011<br />
consolidation of the economic base in the relatively better off areas. It is important to note that<br />
the HDI for the <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Cape</strong> (0.55) is substantially below the South African figure of 0.72. From<br />
the table above it is evident that the HDI of 0.55 displays a pattern of semi‐development, and<br />
there is a definite inequality between the different population groups, with the Whites having a<br />
higher development lifestyle than the African or Coloured groups.<br />
E.2.1 POVERTY<br />
Poverty is a key problem with a high number of households living below the poverty line. Poverty<br />
cannot be measured by income alone nor can anti‐poverty measures only address income‐<br />
enhancing measures. This necessitates a multi‐sectoral and an integrated approach (PGDS). <strong>The</strong><br />
strategy that has proved most effective in improving economic and social well‐being consists of<br />
three elements, namely labour absorbing growth, equitable investment in education and health<br />
care and social support for poor and vulnerable groups. Social welfare policies and programs must<br />
be aimed at enabling the poor and vulnerable groups to break the cycle of poverty. Social and<br />
economic development are two inter‐dependent and mutually reinforcing processes. Equitable<br />
social development is the foundation of economic prosperity and economic growth is necessary<br />
for social development. Without social investment, economic growth will be compromised. <strong>The</strong><br />
key challenges facing the social sector are to:<br />
• Enhance social integration and protection of the most vulnerable; and<br />
• Build a caring society through sustainable development.<br />
According to Botes (2011) 21 , two of the most frequent ways of measuring poverty is to use:<br />
• Poverty line which is the average sum of money that a household or individual needs to<br />
survive.<br />
• Poverty gap, which indicates how far a household or individual falls below the poverty line<br />
<strong>The</strong> proportion of <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Cape</strong> people living below the poverty line has declined from 40 % in<br />
1995 to 27 % in 2011, while the poverty gap was 11 % in 1995, compared to eight % 2011. In this<br />
regard, the province intend to halve poverty by 2015, the population living below the poverty line<br />
must stand at 20%, which means that the province is left between 2011 and 2015 to reduce<br />
poverty by 7 % (Botes, 2011).<br />
Table E.12: Percentage of people of living in poverty in the <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Cape</strong> (Source: Global Insight,<br />
2009 as cited in the PGDS).<br />
Region 1996 2009<br />
<strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Cape</strong> 43.8% 42.8%<br />
John Taolo Gaetsewe 62.5% 52.8%<br />
Namaqua 32.7% 41.0%<br />
Pixley ka Seme 49.6% 44.7%<br />
Siyanda 40.5% 39.1%<br />
Frances Baard 35.2% 39.5%<br />
<strong>The</strong> table above illustrates that from 1996 to 2009, the percentage of people living in poverty only<br />
decreased by 1% but people living in poverty is still at 42, 8% which is very high. Frances Baard<br />
experienced an increase in poverty by approximately 4%. However, John Taolo Gaetsewe<br />
21<br />
Botes, A. 2011: Budget speech by MEC for Social <strong>Development</strong> by Alvin Botes. 5 April 2011.<br />
http://www.info.gov.za/speech/DynamicAction?pageid=461&sid=17611&tid=31597<br />
Office of the Premier &<br />
Department of Rural <strong>Development</strong> & Land Reform<br />
84<br />
Dennis Moss Partnership