03.05.2013 Views

Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...

Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...

Volume II - The Northern Cape Provincial Spatial Development ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Cape</strong> PSDF<br />

<strong>Volume</strong> 2<br />

December 2011<br />

A study 19 conducted in Pixley ka Seme and Namaqua districts in 2005, found that 79% of the<br />

respondents find seasonal employment within the province. Another 21% migrate out of the<br />

province, mainly to the Western <strong>Cape</strong>, although a few find work in the Eastern <strong>Cape</strong> and the Free<br />

State. Most of the respondents indicated that they do not migrate too far from their permanent<br />

residence and the average distance and the average distance travelled to work is 109 kilometres.<br />

Seven percent of the respondents indicated that their immediate family travels with them to their<br />

place of work.<br />

Migration is in many ways a response to structural disequilibria between and with sectors of the<br />

economy and much pressure for migration is created by the deepening and widening inequality in<br />

income and opportunities within the country and between South Africa and its neighbours.<br />

Migration patterns and trends have far reaching impacts on the social, economic and<br />

environmental conditions in the areas of origin and destination and the process is hence often,<br />

mistakenly, described as a problem. However, it should be understood that migration is often a<br />

central component of households’ livelihood strategies, and that it not only offers hope for the<br />

future, but that it could play a vital role in redressing past inequities.<br />

E.2 SOCIO‐ECONOMIC STATUS<br />

<strong>The</strong> HDI (Human <strong>Development</strong> Index) provides an alternative method to measure the relative<br />

socio‐economic development of an area and is seen as a measure of people’s ability to live a long<br />

and healthy live, to communicate, to participate in the community and have sufficient means to be<br />

able to afford a decent living 20 .<br />

Table E.11: Human <strong>Development</strong> Index for the <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Cape</strong> and District Municipalities (Source:<br />

Global Insight, 2009 as cited in the PGDS).<br />

Region White African Coloured TOTAL<br />

<strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Cape</strong> 0.87 0.44 0.54 0.55<br />

John Taolo Gaetsewe 0.89 0.41 0.54 0.46<br />

Namaqua 0.88 0.47 0.57 0.63<br />

Pixley ka Seme 0.85 0.42 0.46 0.52<br />

Siyanda 0.87 0.43 0.53 0.57<br />

Frances Baard 0.87 0.47 0.59 0.57<br />

Over the past 8 years there has been little to no variance in the HDI figures for the <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Cape</strong>,<br />

indicating no increase or decrease in the overall standard of living. This trend is unlikely to change<br />

in the foreseeable future, mainly due to the marginal economic base of the poorer areas, and the<br />

19 Setplan, 2006. as cited in the Pixley ka Seme SDF (June 2007).<br />

20 <strong>The</strong> Human <strong>Development</strong> Index (HDI) was developed by the United Nations <strong>Development</strong> Program (UNDP) based<br />

on the philosophy that the goal of development was to ensure that individuals live long, informed and<br />

comfortable lives. <strong>The</strong> HDI consists of three components:<br />

• Longevity, which is measured by life expectancy at birth.<br />

• Educational attainment, which is measured by two education variables, namely adult literacy and combined<br />

gross primary, secondary and tertiary enrolment ratio.<br />

• Income, which is measured by gross domestic product (GDP) per capita.<br />

Performance in each dimension is expressed as a value between 0 and 1, and the HDI index gives an<br />

internationally accepted measure of the wellness (quality of life) of the population of the area under<br />

consideration. An HDI of 0.8 or more is considered to represent high development, whilst an HDI of below 0.5 is<br />

considered to represent low development.<br />

Office of the Premier &<br />

83<br />

Dennis Moss Partnership<br />

Department of Rural <strong>Development</strong> & Land Reform

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!