02.05.2013 Views

Download het volledig rapport (302 p.) - KCE

Download het volledig rapport (302 p.) - KCE

Download het volledig rapport (302 p.) - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>KCE</strong> reports vol. 6A Prenatale zorg 209<br />

Study Ref Population Intervention Outcomes Results<br />

Specificity 0.96 (0.94 to<br />

0.97)<br />

Fetal loss 2.0<br />

Comments Study<br />

type<br />

Dick, 1994 4 [608] 4 cohort studies Comparison of<br />

proportion of DownÊs<br />

syndrome pregnancies<br />

identified through triple<br />

testing with the total<br />

number of DownÊs<br />

syndrome pregnancies<br />

Conde-<br />

Agudelo<br />

and<br />

Kafury-<br />

Geota,<br />

1998<br />

4 [320] 20 cohort studies,<br />

194,326 pregnant<br />

women<br />

Meta-analysis of<br />

effectiveness of triple<br />

marker screening for<br />

DownÊs syndrome<br />

Renal pyelectasis (95% CI):<br />

Sensitivity 0.02 (0.01 to<br />

0.06)<br />

Specificity 0.99 (0.98,<br />

1.0)<br />

Fetal loss 2.6<br />

Detection rates Range 48% to 91% with false<br />

positive rate<br />

of 3.2 to 6%, respectively<br />

(cutoff rates<br />

from 1/190 to 1/274 used)<br />

Sensitivities and false<br />

positive rates<br />

When varying cutoff rates<br />

were accounted for, triple<br />

marker screening in the 2nd<br />

trimester with AFP, hCG,<br />

and uE3 combined with<br />

maternal age offered 50%<br />

detection rate in women <<br />

35 years with 5% false<br />

positive rate<br />

Sensitivities for maternal age<br />

º 35 years:<br />

For cutoff rates 1/190 to<br />

1/200, 89% (range 78% to<br />

100%), false positive rate 25%<br />

(range 20% to 29%)<br />

For cutoff rates 1/250 to<br />

1/295, 80% (range 75% to<br />

SR of<br />

CH<br />

SR of<br />

CH<br />

EL<br />

2b<br />

2b

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!