Download het volledig rapport (302 p.) - KCE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

<strong>KCE</strong> reports vol. 6A Prenatale zorg 172 Study Ref Population Intervention hour, GTT for glucose Outcomes Results Comments Study type EL levels > 135 mg/dl from 50-g test Specificity 98.5% Watson, 4 [493] 500 consecutive Urinanalysis compared GDM 22/500 (4.4%) diagnosed with GDM CH 2b 1990 patients at an with 50g, 1 hour, GCT antenatal clinic in at 28 weeks gestation Glycosuria 85/500 (17%) showed some degree of glycosuria Germany followed by 100 g, 3 (defined as present at at least two antenatal visits) hour, OGTT for Sensitivity and glucose levels >140 mg/dl from 50g test specificity 6/22 (27%) of women with GDM showed glycosuria Sensitivity 27.3% McElduff et al., 1994 Jowett et al., 1987 Reichelt et al., 1998 4 [496] 714 women attending antenatal clinic in New South Wales, Australia 4 [497] 110 pregnant women with suspected GDM in England 4 [498] 5010 pregnant women in Brazil RPG (random plasma glucose) measured within two hours of a meal (º 6.1 mmol/l considered positive) compared with 1-hour, 50-g GCT at 28 weeks GDM diagnoses confirmed by 100-g GTT RPG levels tested over 24hour period (08:00, 12:00, 15:00, 17:00, 22:00 hours) and 75-g GTT administered FPG (fasting plasma glucose) at 24 to 28 GDM Sensitivity and specificity of RPG Sensitivities and specificities at various thresholds and at various times of day of RPG test GDM Specificity 83.5% 28/714 (3.9%) with GDM Sensitivity 46% Specificity 86% At threshold 5.6 mmol/l: sensitivity range 29% to 80%; specificity range 74% to 80% At threshold 6.1 mmol/l: sensitivity range 41% to 58%, specificity range 74% to 96% Highest sensitivities reported at 15:00 hours 379/5010 (7.6%, 95% CI 6.8 to 8.3) women with GDM Period of fasting not CH 2b TES 3 CH 2b
<strong>KCE</strong> reports vol. 6A Prenatale zorg 173 Study Ref Population Intervention Outcomes Results Comments Study type EL from 1991 to weeks of gestation was Optimal threshold specified 1995 with no compared with 2-hour, for maximising At 89 mg/dl (4.9 mmol/l), sensitivity and specificity prior diagnosis of 75-g GTT (used for sensitivity and maximised at 88% and 78%, respectively diabetes diagnosis) specificity of FPG Perucchini 4 [499] 520 women in FPG compared with 1- GDM 53/520 (10.2%) women with GDM Results CH 2b et al., Switzerland from hour, 50-g GCT were 1999 1995 to 1997 between 24 and 28 Optimal threshold At 4.8 mmol/l, sensitivity and specificity for FPG irrespective weeks of gestation for maximising maximised at 81% and 76%, respectively, (155/520 of last time sensitivity and (30%) of women would have had to proceed to GTT women had One week later, all specificity of FPG for diagnosis) eaten patients also took 3- and 1hour, 50-g hour, 100-g GTT GCT At 7.0 mmol/l, sensitivity and specificity maximised at 68% and 82%, respectively Lewis et 4 [500] 10 women with Between 26 and 32 Plasma glucose Cases: fasting = 10.5 mM plasma glucose, 1-hour = TES 2b al., 1993 GDM and 12 weeks of gestation, levels after each test 11.0 mM plasma glucose, 2-hour = 9.3 mM plasma controls from each person underwent for women with glucose (p < 0.03) Chicago, USA 3 GCT tests within a 2- GDM vs. controls week period (order of Controls: fasting = 7.8 mM plasma glucose, 1-hour = tests was randomised 6.7 mM plasma glucose (p < 0.01), 2-hour = 6.4 mM for each person) plasma glucose Stamilio et al., 2004 87 1825 eligible patients at the University of Test 1: 50-g GCT in fasting state Test 2: 50-g GCT 1 hour after a meal Test 3: 50-g GCT 2 hours after a meal Comparison of a negative GCT and a false-positive GCT 7/12 (58%) controls with glucose º 7.8 mM in fasting state Perinatal outcomes The false-positive GCT cohort had more frequently adverse perinatal outcome, including: A falsepositive GCT was CH 2b
Page 1 and 2:
NATIONALE RICHTLIJN PRENATALE ZORG:
Page 3 and 4:
Nationale richtlijn prenatale zorg:
Page 5 and 6:
KCE reports vol. 6A Prenatale zorg
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152: KCE reports vol. 6A Prenatale zorg
Page 201: KCE reports vol. 6A Prenatale zorg
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
This page is left intentionally bla
Page 301:
KCE reports 1. Effectiviteit en kos
show all

Download het volledig rapport (302 p.) - KCE

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?