02.05.2013 Views

Download het volledig rapport (302 p.) - KCE

Download het volledig rapport (302 p.) - KCE

Download het volledig rapport (302 p.) - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>KCE</strong> reports vol. 6A Prenatale zorg 130<br />

Study Ref Population Intervention Outcomes Results Comments Study type EL<br />

for endorsing a negative result and<br />

confirming possible cases of HIV 2<br />

infection<br />

Samson<br />

and<br />

King, 1998<br />

4<br />

[413]<br />

Literature review to<br />

compile evidence-based<br />

guidelines on HIV<br />

screening in pregnancy<br />

Recommendations on HIV<br />

testing in pregnant women<br />

The importance of requesting a<br />

new specimen upon reactive<br />

confirmation results to ensure<br />

against procedural errors was also<br />

demonstrated<br />

Third generation EIA kits have<br />

sensitivity 99.4%-100% and<br />

specificity 99 100%<br />

Combined EIA and Western blot<br />

protocol has sensitivity 99% and<br />

specificity 99.99%<br />

These are<br />

guidelines for<br />

Canada<br />

What are the interventions to decrease congenitally acquired HIV?<br />

Study Ref Population Intervention Outcomes Results Comments Study<br />

Brocklehurst<br />

and Volmink,<br />

2002<br />

4<br />

[416]<br />

8 RCTs, various<br />

countries, HIV infected,<br />

pregnant women<br />

Cochrane review<br />

Most recent update 2002<br />

Zidovudine<br />

monotherapy vs.<br />

placebo<br />

Zidovudine vs.<br />

zidovudine<br />

Short short vs. long<br />

long<br />

Long short vs. long<br />

long<br />

HIV infection status of<br />

child<br />

Zidovudine vs. placebo,<br />

4RCTs (n = 1379): OR 0.44<br />

(95% CI 0.33 to 0.59)<br />

Short short vs. long long,<br />

1 RCT (n = 453): OR 2.46<br />

(95% CI 1.15 to 5.27)<br />

Long-short vs. long-long,<br />

1RCT (n = 746): OR 0.66<br />

(95% CI 0.35, 1.24)<br />

Short long vs. long long, 1<br />

In two studies, there was<br />

uncertainty about w<strong>het</strong>her<br />

randomisation was<br />

adequately concealed.<br />

Another study was not blind<br />

once the randomly allocated<br />

packs were opened. The<br />

remaining 5 studies were<br />

double blind and randomised<br />

EL<br />

type<br />

SR 1a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!