Annual Report 2007 - Muehlhan AG
Annual Report 2007 - Muehlhan AG
Annual Report 2007 - Muehlhan AG
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
30<br />
despite the rapidly initiated and implemented reorganization<br />
program, MMi contributed a loss of Eur 3.0 million<br />
to consolidated net profit.<br />
during the renovation of a portion of the Golden Gate<br />
bridge by our subsidiary company CCC, significant difficulties<br />
arose in <strong>2007</strong>, which – in our view – can be attributed<br />
primarily to intentionally false contractual information:<br />
on the one hand, the terms and conditions of the invitation<br />
to bid were incomplete with respect to a decisive point related<br />
to the scope of services. on the other hand, based<br />
on today’s knowledge, we are convinced that the seller and<br />
subsequent managing director of the company knowingly<br />
withheld essential information from us. We are currently<br />
engaged in a legal proceeding in the case with two opponents:<br />
in July of <strong>2007</strong>, we sued our direct client, a joint venture<br />
between a large exchange-listed Japanese company<br />
and a medium-sized american company, for compensation<br />
for damages in the amount of uS$ 3.8 million and<br />
accounts receivable due of uS$ 2.5 million (overall uS$ 6.3<br />
million) due to incomplete bidding documentation. to date,<br />
the client has acknowledged the latter only to the extent of<br />
uS$ 1.3 million, but initially retained it while making its own<br />
claims for compensation for damages. furthermore, he is<br />
making a claim for an additional uS$ 2.0 million without<br />
further explanation of the legal grounds, for which we have<br />
created no reserves for the lack of concrete terms. to date,<br />
we have already been successful in two proceedings with<br />
regard to the determination of legal jurisdiction. We expect<br />
that the proceedings will be decided in our favour in the<br />
coming months. in addition, we are reserving the right<br />
to sue the former shareholder and managing director for<br />
compensation for damages as a result of false contractual<br />
representations to the extent to which we may be unsuccessful<br />
in the proceedings mentioned above against<br />
the first opponent, despite positive expectations. for this<br />
reason, we are currently retaining the second and final<br />
purchase price instalment of uS$ 1 million still outstanding<br />
on the purchase price resulting from the corporate<br />
ac quisition.<br />
Even though we assume that the legal dispute will be decided<br />
in our favour, we have allowed for a total of Eur 2.9<br />
million as losses for the project. together with attorneys’<br />
fees of Eur 0.2 million incurred to date, the project therefore<br />
reduces consolidated net profit by Eur 3.1 million.<br />
at our uS subsidiary company Meaux, which is active in<br />
the offshore sector, as expected there was strong competition<br />
for customers and employees, because a managing<br />
director who left at the end of 2006 had founded a competing<br />
company during his employment by Meaux. a legal<br />
proceeding is pending here due to actions in bad faith. the<br />
reduction in price resulting from the situation has caused<br />
Meaux to add a loss of Eur 0.7 million to consolidated<br />
net income. in the meantime, we were partly able to win<br />
back lost customers such that that we are confident that<br />
our competitive situation will improve significantly in the<br />
coming months.<br />
Restructuring program in the USA leads<br />
to cost savings of EUR 2.5 million in 2008<br />
as a result of the lack of sales successes and the existing<br />
overcapacity, a comprehensive restructuring program was<br />
started in June. in the course of the restructuring program,<br />
the continental management level was abolished and<br />
administrative expenses were significantly reduced. the<br />
program has since been completed and will result in cost<br />
savings of more than Eur 2.5 million starting in 2008.<br />
MMi (formerly Sipco) now has a structure whose costs<br />
are covered by existing work. if the remaining work<br />
decreases even more in the future, a closure of the<br />
entire shipyard operation would be considered. the closure<br />
costs arising as a result, however, can be estimated<br />
as being insignificant.<br />
Delays in Oil & Gas Offshore business inhibited<br />
overall business development<br />
the formation of a contract for the maintenance on three<br />
offshore platforms by our subsidiary company MGb as<br />
described under sales trends led to the inability to recover<br />
full costs. in the year 2006 we were successful in winning<br />
an international oil company as a new customer in the<br />
northern North Sea territory, which held out the prospect<br />
of a contract volume of Eur 13.0 million distributed over<br />
24 months. during the course of additional negotiations,<br />
the volume was rapidly reduced to approximately Eur 8.0<br />
million pending further notice, such that the productivity<br />
and profitability of the contract was significantly impaired,<br />
in no small part due to performance rendered in advance<br />
such as training programs, and the failure to make of use<br />
µ-jet technologies.