02.05.2013 Views

JAERI 1287 JNDC Nuclear Data Library of Fission Products Fir

JAERI 1287 JNDC Nuclear Data Library of Fission Products Fir

JAERI 1287 JNDC Nuclear Data Library of Fission Products Fir

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>JAERI</strong> <strong>1287</strong> 2. <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Data</strong> <strong>Library</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fission</strong> <strong>Products</strong><br />

high energies are too dense and complicated for existing gamma-ray detectors to detect and<br />

resolve all transitions from them. The oversimplification <strong>of</strong> the high energy part leads to an<br />

underestimation or a missing <strong>of</strong> the beta strength at high energy, and leads to an overestimation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ep and an underestimation <strong>of</strong> £r 40) . As is shown by solid line with (A) in Figs. 2.3.3<br />

and 2.3.4, a full adoption <strong>of</strong> experiment-based values <strong>of</strong> Ep and Er results in an overestimation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the beta-ray component <strong>of</strong> decay power and an underestimation <strong>of</strong> the gamma-ray component.<br />

This defect <strong>of</strong> the preliminary version <strong>of</strong> <strong>JNDC</strong> FP DECAY DATA FILE (1980) was<br />

revised by replacing the experimental values <strong>of</strong> Ep and Er by the theoretical values calculated<br />

with the gross theory for all short-lived FPs with Q-values larger than 5 MeV. 96 Y has been<br />

excluded from the group because this nuclide has a large contribution to the decay power<br />

and needs a special consideration. The accuracy <strong>of</strong> the decay power calculation has been<br />

greatly improved not only for 235 U as is seen in Figs. 2.3.3 and 2.3.4 (solid line with(B)) but<br />

also for 239 Pu and 241 Pu. The final version <strong>of</strong> <strong>JNDC</strong> FP <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Data</strong> <strong>Library</strong> adopted the<br />

theoretical values <strong>of</strong> Ep and ET for all FPs whose beta decay Q-values are larger than 5 MeV<br />

though experimental branching ratios are available for 87 nuclides <strong>of</strong> them. This is because the<br />

theoretical values <strong>of</strong> Ep and Er for high Q-value FPs are more reliable than the experimental<br />

sion<br />

r/fis<br />

(Me\<br />

0-1<br />

X<br />

f(t)<br />

power<br />

decay<br />

pa<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

10 u<br />

\^ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I<br />

• ORNL (1980)<br />

• SRRC(1970)<br />

i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i<br />

10 1 10 2<br />

Cooling time , t (s)<br />

Fig. 2.3.4 Effect <strong>of</strong> using theoretical values <strong>of</strong> Ep on the calculated results <strong>of</strong> 23S U beta<br />

decay power. See the caption <strong>of</strong> Fig. 2.3.3 for the further details. The experimental<br />

data are taken from the papers by ORNL (Ref. 3), and by SRRC<br />

(Scotisch Research Reactor Center; MacMahon T.P., Wellum R., and Wilson<br />

H.W. : J. Nucl. Energy 24 (1970) 493).<br />

10 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!