02.05.2013 Views

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Filmmaker’s Guide to Final Cut Pro Workfl ow<br />

The workfl ow that was followed was the standard fi lm-to-fi lm workfl ow, Basic Workfl ow 5 in<br />

<strong>Appendix</strong> 10.<br />

• Foto Kem labs pulled circled takes from the camera negative and spliced in into “selects” rolls.<br />

• Work print was printed from the selects rolls.<br />

• Silent work print was projected to look for problems.<br />

• PD6 audio was transferred to DA88 tape by Laser Pacifi c. Clappers were logged by time code.<br />

• Footage was telecined by Laser Pacifi c to DVCam with zero “A” frame and with fi eld “1” dominance.<br />

NTSC NDF time code was used with burn windows for:<br />

Time code<br />

Key code with pull-down cycle identifi er<br />

Audio time code<br />

• HD Cam was also recorded at the telecine for DVD authoring.<br />

• Each tape was given a different hour code.<br />

• A telecine log was made.<br />

• Audio was sunc in telecine to the clapper logs.<br />

• The telecine logs were imported into a new Cinema Tools database and a batch list was<br />

exported.<br />

• The batch list was imported into a new Final Cut Pro project at 29.97 FPS.<br />

• A batch list was also opened in Excel to create a cutting log.<br />

• The DVCam footage was captured.<br />

• The shots were linked to the database in Cinema Tools.<br />

• All shots were batch reversed to 23.98 FPS.<br />

• The 23.98 FPS shots were linked to the Final Cut Pro project.<br />

• A 23.98 sequence was created in the Final Cut Pro project.<br />

Several problems were found in checking the database. Several slates were mislabeled. These were<br />

noted in the cutting log and database. As the editing moved forward, a major problem was encountered.<br />

When the fi rst fi lm list was exported to check for double uses, several double uses were<br />

reported. Yet these were not double uses, they weren’t even from the same camera rolls. At fi rst, it<br />

looked like the almost impossible had happened, that there were two camera rolls with the same key<br />

code numbers. This turned out to not be the case.<br />

When the selects rolls were telecined, a splice had passed through the telecine without the colorist<br />

noticing. The telecine machine cannot read every key code number; many are interpolated from<br />

known key code numbers. When a splice goes through the telecine, if the new number is not entered,<br />

it will continue with the numeric sequence from the previous roll, logging the wrong key code information<br />

into the telecine log.<br />

216

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!