02.05.2013 Views

Marloth Park Management Plan. - Nkomazi Local Municipality

Marloth Park Management Plan. - Nkomazi Local Municipality

Marloth Park Management Plan. - Nkomazi Local Municipality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Three different scenarios are analysed; the first is based on the assumption that the whole<br />

of <strong>Marloth</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, excluding the current development footprint and actual road surfaces, is<br />

suitable for utilisation (Table 12); second that the current building footprints, actual road<br />

surfaces and landscaped gardens are subtracted from the available area (Table 13); and<br />

third that only the parkland and current road reserves are available for utilisation (Table<br />

14).<br />

If it is considered that stocking densities for Burchell’s zebra Equus burchelli should not<br />

exceed four animals per 100 ha of suitable habitat, blue wildebeest Connochaetes<br />

taurinus seven animals per 100 ha, common impala Aepyceros melampus melampus 12<br />

animals per 100 ha, and kudu Tragelaphus strepsiceros three animals per 100 ha, the<br />

following stocking options can be applied.<br />

In the first scenario (Table 12), the optimum stocking density of Burchell’s zebra has<br />

been reached and no active intervention is required in manipulating the animal numbers.<br />

This will place <strong>Marloth</strong> <strong>Park</strong> on a 13.54 percent non-selective graze utilisation that leaves<br />

a deficit of 36.46. As the introduction of other animal species to fill this niche is not<br />

currently recommended, their impact on the vegetation need be simulated applying<br />

accepted ecological management principles. In the high selectivity category the current<br />

stocking density of blue wildebeest can be increased to 108 individuals. In the mixed<br />

feeder category, however, the impala stocking density must be reduced to 185 animals.<br />

The kudu from the same category can be increased to 46 animals. The giraffe from the<br />

browse feeder category also need to be reduced to seven animals, because of range<br />

requirements. If these numbers are exceeded the giraffe population must be monitored for<br />

any deviant behaviour, and the vegetation monitored for undesirable change such as<br />

hourglass formations. Applying these recommendations will ensure a 42.03 percent<br />

utilisation of the potential ecological graze capacity and a 78.28 percent utilisation of the<br />

potential ecological browse capacity, excluding the giraffe utilisation.<br />

In the second scenario (Table 13), the optimum stocking density for Burchell’s zebra is 50<br />

individuals, in which case 12 animals need to be removed from <strong>Marloth</strong> <strong>Park</strong>. In the high<br />

selectivity category the current stocking density of blue wildebeest can be increased to 88<br />

individuals. In the mixed feeder category, however, the impala stocking density must be<br />

reduced to 150 animals. The kudu from the same category can be increased to 38 animals.<br />

The giraffe from the browse feeder category also need to be reduced to six animals,<br />

because of range requirements.<br />

© Ecological Associates/ <strong>Marloth</strong> <strong>Park</strong> 75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!