Marloth Park Management Plan. - Nkomazi Local Municipality

Marloth Park Management Plan. - Nkomazi Local Municipality Marloth Park Management Plan. - Nkomazi Local Municipality

nkomazimun.co.za
from nkomazimun.co.za More from this publisher
02.05.2013 Views

Secondary analysis summarises the derived values for each individual tree species and extrapolate the collected data to values for each homogenous unit. The dominance of tree species, density and potential dry leaf mass are calculated and expressed per hectare. Tree density values are used to assess the level of encroachment based on species dominance, while the potential dry leaf mass values are used to determine the available leaf biomass to browsing animal species. The results obtained from the BECVOL analysis allow for the calculation of potential available browse as well as actual available browse. To take the various browsing heights of different animal species into account, leaf dry mass is stratified according to maximum browse heights of 1.5 m for impala, 2 m for kudu and 5 m for giraffe and elephant. The dry leaf mass below 2 m is considered the most important value as it represents the maximum browse height of most browse antelope species. The available browse for the different maximum browsing heights is derived from multiplying the respective leaf dry mass values with the total area of the relevant homogenous unit. Not all leaf material below the specified maximum browse height is readily available to browsers, and the following percentages are deducted consecutively from the available browse: • 50 %, as the core leaf areas of trees are beyond the reach of browsers. • 25 %, as trees are also utilised by other animals such as birds and insects. • 25 % of the remaining value is deducted to allow for sufficient plant re-growth and vigour. With the reduced leaf mass value the actual browsing capacity for each unit is calculated. For calculating browse capacity the actually available browse is related to the dry leaf requirements of one Browse Animal Unit (BAU), where a Browse Animal Unit is equated to the metabolic energy requirements of a kudu with a body mass of 140 kg body mass. To sustain an animal of this mass, the dry leaf mass intake requirement is approximately 3 percent of its body mass. A kudu thus ingests 4.2 kg of browse per day, or 1533 kg per year. Using these values, the browse capacity can be calculated for each homogenous unit. © Ecological Associates/ Marloth Park 49

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The browsing capacity was estimated from leaf mass production calculated using the BECVOL programme. Leaf production was calculated at a maximum browse height of 2 m as most animals cannot utilise plant growth beyond this height, with exception of the giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis and elephant Loxodonta africana. The potential leaf mass production was reduced to actual available leaf mass and divided by the requirements of a Browse Animal Unit (BAU) to derive optimum stocking densities. Plant community 1: The Chloris virgata – Acacia grandicornuta Low thicket This plant community is approximately 390 ha in size, and has a density of 1450 trees per hectare. The tree layer is dominated by sickle bush Dichrostachys cinerea with 350 trees per hectare. The sub-dominant trees are red bushwillow Combretum apiculatum and white raisin Grewia bicolor each with 200 trees per hectare. This plant community is not currently encroached. The potential leaf biomass production below 2 m is moderate at 300 kg/ha; however, only 83 kg/ha is available as browse. If all open areas on Marloth Park are accepted as suitable habitat for wildlife, 1 GAU (Table 6) can be sustained. If the landscaped garden habitats are excluded, this plant community can still sustain 1 GAU (Table 7). However, if only the parkland and road reserves are considered as suitable habitat for animal species, no animals (Table 8) can be sustained. Plant community 2: The Trichoneura grandiglumis – Combretum apiculatum Short bushland This plant community is approximately 390 ha in size, and has a density of 1200 trees per hectare. The tree layer is dominated by red bushwillow Combretum apiculatum with 227 trees per hectare. The sub-dominant trees are and white raisin Grewia bicolor with 160 trees per hectare, giant raisin Grewia hexamita with 147 trees per hectare, sickle bush Dichrostachys cinerea with 133 trees per hectare and sandpaper raisin Grewia flavescens with 120 trees per hectare. This plant community is not currently encroached, furthermore, the combined density of Grewia species act as important food source to browsing animal species as these shrubs produce most leaf material below the maximum browse height of 2 m. The potential leaf biomass production below 2 m is moderate at 412 kg/ha; however, only 115 kg/ha is available as browse. If all open areas on Marloth Park are accepted as suitable habitat for wildlife, 41 GAU (Table 6) can be sustained. If the landscaped garden habitats are excluded, this plant community can still sustain 33 GAU (Table 7). However, if only the parkland and road reserves are considered as suitable habitat for animal species, only 18 GAU (Table 8) can be sustained without further degradation of the environment. © Ecological Associates/ Marloth Park 50

Secondary analysis summarises the derived values for each individual tree species and<br />

extrapolate the collected data to values for each homogenous unit. The dominance of tree<br />

species, density and potential dry leaf mass are calculated and expressed per hectare. Tree<br />

density values are used to assess the level of encroachment based on species dominance,<br />

while the potential dry leaf mass values are used to determine the available leaf biomass to<br />

browsing animal species.<br />

The results obtained from the BECVOL analysis allow for the calculation of potential<br />

available browse as well as actual available browse. To take the various browsing heights of<br />

different animal species into account, leaf dry mass is stratified according to maximum<br />

browse heights of 1.5 m for impala, 2 m for kudu and 5 m for giraffe and elephant. The dry<br />

leaf mass below 2 m is considered the most important value as it represents the maximum<br />

browse height of most browse antelope species. The available browse for the different<br />

maximum browsing heights is derived from multiplying the respective leaf dry mass values<br />

with the total area of the relevant homogenous unit. Not all leaf material below the specified<br />

maximum browse height is readily available to browsers, and the following percentages are<br />

deducted consecutively from the available browse:<br />

• 50 %, as the core leaf areas of trees are beyond the reach of browsers.<br />

• 25 %, as trees are also utilised by other animals such as birds and insects.<br />

• 25 % of the remaining value is deducted to allow for sufficient plant re-growth<br />

and vigour.<br />

With the reduced leaf mass value the actual browsing capacity for each unit is calculated. For<br />

calculating browse capacity the actually available browse is related to the dry leaf<br />

requirements of one Browse Animal Unit (BAU), where a Browse Animal Unit is equated to<br />

the metabolic energy requirements of a kudu with a body mass of 140 kg body mass. To<br />

sustain an animal of this mass, the dry leaf mass intake requirement is approximately<br />

3 percent of its body mass. A kudu thus ingests 4.2 kg of browse per day, or 1533 kg per year.<br />

Using these values, the browse capacity can be calculated for each homogenous unit.<br />

© Ecological Associates/ <strong>Marloth</strong> <strong>Park</strong> 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!