02.05.2013 Views

MKS Implementer 2006 Administration Guide

MKS Implementer 2006 Administration Guide

MKS Implementer 2006 Administration Guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5: <strong>MKS</strong> Integrity Integration<br />

248<br />

The need for this decision—beyond having control of the overall scope of your conversion<br />

project—is that with co-existence you can designate on a user basis which issue tracking<br />

system a user works with. It allows you to have groups of users still using DesignTracker<br />

while other users use <strong>MKS</strong> Integrity. This approach is beneficial to larger organizations with<br />

many end users, as it allows you to train and migrate groups of individuals rather than all<br />

users at once. For information on setting the issue management system for a user, see<br />

page 253.<br />

To simplify working with two issue management systems, while co-existence is active you<br />

configure each issue management system to manage a different range of numbers, where<br />

issues and DRs each have a specific number range that is unique to each type, and numbers<br />

outside of the specified ranges are not allowed. DRs always have the lowest numbers and<br />

<strong>MKS</strong> Integrity issues have the higher numbers.<br />

Everyone is able to view all IDs and some basic information, but the check out and promotion<br />

functions require users to only use the issue management system they are set up for. This<br />

methodology allows DesignTracker to use numbers up to the last allowed DR number you<br />

specify. Information on setting the last DR number begins on page 250.<br />

You achieve a successful conversion when all <strong>Implementer</strong> user profiles that perform check<br />

out or promotion functions are set to use <strong>MKS</strong> Integrity for issue management. Although, it<br />

may be desirable to keep a few users with a second user profile set to use DesignTracker so<br />

they can fully navigate the DesignTracker audit trail.<br />

Once the conversion finishes, the DesignTracker transactions can remain online and visible to<br />

the select DesignTracker users for historical purposes. There is no need to disable coexistence<br />

after you finish the conversion.<br />

IMPORTANT <strong>MKS</strong> recommends you convert to a pilot copy of <strong>MKS</strong> Integrity to verify<br />

the results before going “live” with converted data. <strong>MKS</strong> also recommends you<br />

perform a backup of the DesignTracker database by saving the <strong>Implementer</strong> library<br />

prior to running this conversion program.<br />

Promotion Considerations With Co-existence<br />

The following promotion-related considerations apply to working in the co-existent mode:<br />

All issues for a single promotion request must be in the same issue management system.<br />

In other words, you cannot assign both DRs and issues to the same promotion request.<br />

If using concurrent development, do not allow the same member to have locks<br />

associated with a DR and issue in the same environment, as this will make it non<br />

promotable.<br />

The user that submits a move request must use the same issue management system as<br />

the user who created the request. For example, on a request that contains DRs, both the<br />

requestor and the user submitting the move must be set up to use DesignTracker. On a<br />

request that contains issues, the respective users must be set up to use <strong>MKS</strong> Integrity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!