to view document - SC Superior Court E-Filing

20 

2T 

22 

23 

24 

25 

17 

18 

T9 

26) 

21l 

28// 

I 

2 

J 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8l I 

'l/ 

i:// 

,r ll 

131/ 

14il 

u 

is ll 

Í 

16 ü 

Y.:tI-g L. Coggshalt (Bar No. 2Û731) 

ARCHERNORRTS 

ruU"O:*l+l*çt+,?.s^, 

rerephone: SZS.SZO.AA0O 

¡acsnnrle: 925.930.6620 

#i:ffðî?tifr#roN. rNC 

i$e#,ii,ffi,H,ïL-,, 

Plainrif{ 

Htr51tpffi;ryå::sifl*T'' 

*ç.;it+anrffi*ru*- 

ryårfltffi' 

;,ffiäiffr,i'rt?i,iffi,,," 

ffgp,s"s,+'{þrl¡iffi,"ä 

itr-:å-h*}ffii;ï:*' 

iä^ß"s,i"iRË{gå**r; 

TXWI¡/g99358_l 

SUPERIOR COTIRT OF CALIFORNIA 

COLINTY OF SANTA CLARA 

IINLIMiTED TURISDICTION 

CaseNo. tt0CVI72317 

E-FILED 

Aug 10, 2010 1:51 PM 

David H. Yamasaki 

Chief Executive Officer/Clerk 

Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara 

Case #1-10-CV-172317 Filing #G-24564 

By J. Cao-Nguyen, Deputy 

*ft #ro*'""3äËilyrïf?v,rNc.,s 

Action Filed: May 18,2010

22 

z) 

25 

26 

27 

ta 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

E-FILED: Aug 10, 2010 1:51 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-10-CV-172317 Filing #G-24564 

1 

2 

J 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

1t 

12 

73 

14 

15 

16 

COlt4ES NOWDefejndant 

D.F. RIOS CONSTRUCTION, 

INC. on behalf of itseÌf and 

for no othe¡ Defendant and 

and each and 

This answering Defen 

nswers plaintiff s complaint on file herein as follows: 

"u".rou.uouoiiT:ï:îiff:;"'J#*"*n orthe comprainr on nre he¡ein 

in the sum or sums alleged, or . 

,ha'f p,ainrirr is en,i,red,. -"#ï;îî;î"ïïrîiÏîiïîîî:îJil:: 

t rn any amount whatsoever. 

For a nrst, separare -:Iffi "f:i'H#::Ì PÌ^y'iå' 

""":ï#:ïi:,jT,.yï::î::iïff ::åî,îi:ï;:ï:,"i,"J:î::..,. 

Forasecond,"__.'"':,::::ijmï_q,!,EFENsE 

to 

Defendant aneges that any and a' recovery by praintiff, 'nt 

,rltt 

complain! this answering 

failure 

is bar¡ed 

to properly 

by virrue 

mitigate 

of Plaintiffs 

their own a'eged damug"r, ir*f 

THIRD AXFIR]I4¡{TIVE DEFENS E 

Fo¡ a third, separate 

^, '^^'^-'":t to 

Defendant alleges ^"::::;:::::"::;:::. the complain! 

that plaintrr, 

this answering 

jff or 

". "*^-" others' so carelessly' :t** 

recklessly 

themselves 

and negiigentry 

so as to 

conducted 

cause * 

alleged 

have damages, 

been sustained iranv, alreged or.r.nrr"îT:ffiïîr.|ï 

ro 

active 

recovery 

negligence, 

herein Plaintiffs 

as to any dam 

diminisheri rn rr¡c 

^_+^_. ., , u1r,.o*o"o Oy plaintif{ 

if any, is 

diminished 

barred andlor 

to the 

should 

extent be 

that such ¿rq.,.^-- _,-^_ .- " "'r' ¡ù u¿{reû andlor shourd be 

;uch damages were proximately caused 

legal fault 

by the 

of the piaintifl 

negligence or other 

TXWLC,/9993 58 _ I 

oroor"o*ro%

¿J 

24 

25 

26 

11 

28 

77 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 


1 

2 

J 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

t2 

13 

14 

15 

-to 

F'O URTH AFFIRT4ATIIT DEFENSE 

(L'omparative Fautt) 

For a fourth, separate and distinct affirmative defense to the 

Defendart " compÌaint, 

mt alleses ateges 

"" this 

that 

answering 

that any en¡, and -_¡ ail ^tt 

"o 

events and happenings in 

uomplamt, this answeri 

_ _-.* 

'4r,r,çuurgs rn con¡ection 

contarned rontained with 

in rhc .^,--r_:-. 

the 

in allegations 

the complaint were rlproximately nrô.,.ihol-r,, 

caused ^^_- 

and contributed *'"""" other rther 

to ru by oy 

regar leeal 

rne the negrigence 

fauit farlt of .,r^+r.-- othe¡ and 

parties .^^,_, 

negligence and 

hereto. lf praìntiff 

recov.r, any sum 

amount -r -*^¡r whatsoever Yr'4lùuever 

must musf he be re.tr,^-.{ :.. 

herein, nerern, 

reduced such sucl 

in propoÍion to the extent that 

plaintiff. the negligence 

Plaintif{ ësrrçc or o¡ other 

and ôïhê* legal 

other persons -^-^^_- 

fauit of 

or enfiriee entities' proximately ñ,^-,:* ^. caused o;r contributed 

if any 

to plaintifps 

damages, 

,r uoy. 

For a fifth, separate 

^ 

F'IF'TH AF'F'IRTTATIVE 

DEF'ENSE 

(statute of Limitøtions) 

;:ï;ï,i:':ï;;""'"*ffiT"l,iÏ::îî,1- 

rimited ro, S ecrions r r r, r r r'r';'l:; 

Ï: :î:'n'¿''1his arswerins 

.;îî:: ::", :.",.;; i':i:ïiiil rïj t 

SIXTH AFF,IRMATIVE DEF'ENSE 

Forasixth,separateandrrrr^:T:rj:::;:::::: e to the complaint, this answering 

Defendant alleges that any recovery by praintiffwould be r 

-"i: oe unjust and 

ci¡cumstances inequitabie 

of 

under 

the rhe 

case, * o, all performance ,.-.'*__"-":'-^ required by such answering performed. 

Defendant was prope¡ry 

SE T'ENTII AT,FT.RMA TIVE DEF.ENSE 

For a sevenrh, separare and djsrinc¿ 

ou"nse ^:{;;:" to the 

Defendant complaint. 

alleges 

this answering 

that by its conduct --"""! plaintiffhas ¡ r4'rrt'llas waived warved tthe 

causes complaint. 

ofaction set forth in the 

EIGITTH AXF'IRMATI\,T DEÌ,ENSE 

(Laches) 

For an eighth, separate and dislincl aflìrmadve 

'¡'auvc defel oeænse to the 

Defendant complaint' 

alleges that praintor,this 

answering 

ff is a"-., bar¡ed from *^* 

îxwrc/ese3s8_t 

pursuing the causes ofaction set forth in the 

J 

o.r.rroscoNs@

22 

)?, 

24 

25 

26 

27 

17 

18 

19 

20 

.L 


I 

2 

J 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

II 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

complaint due to laches. 

For a ninth, separate 

NINTH AFF'IRMATTVE DEF,ENSE 

^ro orrrr^r'llli,Ï^":,:::::! 

affirmative defense to the 

Defendant 

complaint, this 

alleges answering 

that it is entitled t,-.' to an âñ award ô,¡,^_.¡ 

of attomey,s 

procedu¡e fèes pursuart 

se.ri^h rnzo , ,tï, ' to 

section 

Code of 

103g, CiviÌ 

by which attorney,s fees may be 

rwwr p'.suârt to code ofcivil 

ded 

:omplaint upon 

for exnr"ece ô, i--,:^r . enûy 

, 

ofjudgment on a 

;#T:::ï.:^":]:r-...remniryorcontrir,,"",;;;;:är:Ï".ii;, 

- 

without 

--' " ¡rv¡¡ ùnu' oomplarnt 

any reasonable has been 

cause anrl or.,n¿ f^:+L L ,. ^ ., 

filed 

and good faith beliefthat ther

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

)'7 

28 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

T9 


I 

2 

J 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

I1 

12 

warve¡' due to the failure to give this aaswering Defendafit afìy notice ofdefects, if any, and a 

reasonable opportunity to cure any alieged defects. 

F,OURTEENTH AFF,IRMATTVE DEF.ENSE 

Fo¡ a fourteenth, separate *, -::::: ;:r:^:::: efense to the complaint. this answering 

Defendaat requests that the court determine the rights and liabilities ofthe parties and determine 

the proportionate share of fau 

the a*ion, in order rhar pro,"i,ïT,'ï:: ffi ,ffi il jï"ï,; :i';:';ï:î, " 

F.¡ a nfteen,h*,:P:li* ::!##r::::ï"î:: ense to the complainl, _,, 

Defendant this 

alleges 

answering 

on information and beliefthat persons or entities orher 

Defendant 

than this answerìng 

misused a¡rd ra'ed ro ;::;::":-i:ersons 

rhisa*ionthe¡e'r",,.,,r",'"'"åoo"";Trî;ï",:',,î;";rïî::ffiï,,:"" 

SIXTEENTH AF,F,IRMATIVE DEF,ENSE 

For a sixreenrh, separate 

^ro orrrrnl^f,íüllil"derense ro rhe complainr, 

Defendant thìs 

a'eges answering 

on information ard belief that pe¡sons or entities other than this answering 

defendant' without the knowredge or consent of this answering Defendaat, artered the subject 

ïjr,jr" 

the extenr that aay alleged damages were solely and proximareiy caused by such 

.o, u,"u",,,""o,jï"" -iîtr?"JÏ"?"o 

DEF'EN'E 

defense to the complaint, this 

answering Defendant a'eges that praintiff expressly or impriedry approved and/or ratified any 

and all wo¡k performed by this answering Defendant at *ï. rhe subjecr 

prainriffhas properrv and the¡efo¡e 

waived and is .r;;;":::*.-:-r 

rpped from asserfing any claims arising out of such mafte¡. 

/// 

/// 

TXWrc/999358_l 

o r nros cow

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 


1 

2 

J 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

EIGHTEENTH AF,FIRMATIVE DEFENSE 

laccord aad Satisfaction) _- ".,",_ 

For an eighteenth, separate and distinct affirmadve r 

answering Derendant aneges * "*"se 

"J;;"::.::i*'1" 

to the compraint, rhis 

an accord and satisfaction between the parties barring the 

compraint. 

For a nineteenrh ;i""-*î',*ffi #'ETEFEN'E 

defense 

Defendanr to the complaint, 

alreges rhat 

this 

ir 

answering 

has ,*" ::,:"; excused from - 1]r1auve 

pe¡fomance of 

because of plainrr*. any contract alleged by plaintiff 

or,". o."li 

r*r*r¿#Il#IW:#,?fF,ENsE 

t1 

::x ,a FôrânrA-+; For a rwentieth, +L separate and il 

distinct affirm ur, ", *-,t 

o"*nse 

t s oerenoant to the complaint, 

alleges that 

this 

rhe 

answering 

/ conr¡act alreged to .*,., 0",u" een it and l4 t+ // etuinrirr*d Plaintiff -v{r . arru Plaintiff rrarnnrl 

and 

was 

was dra 

unconc^;^n¡Lr^ unconscionabre 

fted 

^..r 

by 

// al Lhe rime ¿¡rtrc Ì¿ it was m¡ made. lt is therefore unenforceable. 

,, ll 

', / F.nr.+...^-._ -'*I#:,--iïy;¡'.y*"rr!.8-DE.FENsE 

-' vv4s"¿"ns) 

For a twenty-first, separate and distinct affirm rtive defense to the complaint, this 

,, ' ' ll 

// *.r..irrn Defêh.ro-+ ^,, - 

, * ll *r*.n,,, Defendant areges that rhe cont¡act areged 

Plaintiffand conrained non-neSorialed 

lerms and cr 

,, '" // " // Plaintiffto the rrcr.i---. ^.- . 

." 

il 

,o I ntutnttt, to the dehiment ofthis answerìng defendant 

" ;;;;;;,',;"*.iii;i:. *"_", 

-¡¡vrlrvuù rnditions which warcn exclusively benefited bene 

t the time the contract was made. 

TT}TNTY-SECON-D 

AF'FIRMATI 

(ancertaìn 

VE DEFENSE 

l erms¡ 

For a trventy_second, 

separate and distinct affirmative defense 

answering - to 

ng 

the 

Defenrrant Defendant -"^"""' Lne 

clt^-^^ .t 

complaint, 

alleges -.., 

'u complaint' this 

that the contact alleged to rt between uçtween 

by Plainfiff aad coïìr¡ineã 

""r, ìt lt and 

aad 

Plaintiff 

contained was d¡afted d¡af 

uncerrâ;n ertain r^*^ terms' conditions ^^ ,..:. 

a¡d l¿Lnguage 

against rgainst plaindfr plaintiff 

which must be interpreted 

*"*'"'öIW,îI#WISDEF'EN'E 

For a fwenty_thi¡d, 

sepa¡ate ar 

answerìng ¿u urc 

Defendant 

complalnt, 

alleges 

this 

that hat it has h.^- been -__^_-_ excused , 

from ^ pe¡forming any contractuar duties 

ns Defehd,.r -11^^- ,, . rd distinct affirmative defense to the complain! this 

rxwlc,/eee358-1 

_=-___ 

ornioscoNs@ 

6

)) 

23 

25 

26 

27 

28 

17 

18 

19 

20 

¿1 


1 

2 

J 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

t4 

15 

ltt 

I 

alieged by plaintiff 

by reason 

impossibility breach of condition ofr",.""*.,,';T:î";:;.,#;rvaive¿ 

preceden! 

vj r rdrllull, 

plaintiff 

Irustration ofpurpose and/or acceptance by 

TWENTY+o uRqI 

(Futt or pariai -AÌÌ,IRMATIVE DE F.ENSE 

þ;rö;;;;"b 

For rv""s"çet 

a t\¡/enty-fourth, 

separate ¿ md distinct affi¡mative defense 

answering to 

ng 

the urç 

Defend¡,.t Deferrdant -r^^^_ ,r ._ 

compraint, (-:omplarnt, 

alreges 

this 

that all duties owed to plaintif have 

answering been extinguished 

Defendåhr,a Defendant,s r,,ll 

by 

full this 

or partial performance 

TWENTY.F'IFTH.AF'FIRMATIVE DEF'ENSE 

For a rwenry-fif,h. separare *o r,*::":^;;:::**, 

aaswering Defendant alleges that the contract alieged to ""ld"*nt" 

by Plainliffand is a contract c 

must be resoived 

to the complaint, this 

"e"i"o pr"i,llt'"'io"' a'v u'îil,,::i. îj ":::iiî;" .Ï"i 

'\lENTy_srxTH AFFIR¡4ATr},E (Act 

DEF'ENSE 

oÍ God) 

For a twe¡ty_si¡1þ, s eparate and distinct affirmativ arurmatrve defense 

answering to the 

Defendant 

complaint, 

is 

this 

infomro¡ ,.;;;-' 

aileges 

rosses or 

that 

danages, 

anv and 

irany, al injuries, 

#H|""HrffiÏ::u,ts ¡esult 

condirion 

of any unavoidabie 

and, as such, 

incident 

*"." ax ,", o¡ 

aa act ";:"^, of God' '--:'*]maæ 

without faurt or liabilitY 

Defendant, on the 

incruding 

part ofthis 

but 

answering 

no, limited to, an unforeseeable .- úfting 

or preexisting of land mass, 

ancient abnormal la¡dslide. 

rainfall, 

TWENTY-SE\TNTH A.F,F'IRMATTIT DEF'ENSE 

(Economìc Loss) 

For a twenty_seventh, 

separate and disfinct affirmat alürmative defense 

answeringDefen¿ant to the complaint, 

i. i rro.-"1;r:-^]-t: 

this 

;i":.,:.:::;ffii_i"," 

ramages soushr e.o ç^, 

Prupeny' As such, ^ .t thr 

,mic loss, aad these damages c 

itserrwithout an*'**";"#iH"ll".TïÏl."t 

damages sought are for economic -txwr,./sssjss-t 

lnco .-¡.r^- , 

o.r.nroscoNs@ 

.*_.ï:;":** a,,eses rhar any and ai, damases

z5 

24 

25 

)6 

)'7 

28 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 


4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

t1 

T2 

13 

14 

t5 

16 

17 

1 

2 

arswering Defendant. 

rwENTy_Ercl{Tr{ AFFrRtvrATr\T DE FENSE 

(Lack of Stanang¡ 

For a twenty_eighth, 

separate and distinct afûrmative q'rr¡rdLrve defens oeÌense 

answering to the 

.,s Defendant f)efenJo-+;^ :_¡- 

complaint, 

is 

"u this 

informea ând r"-r;-..^^ , , 

uty cornplalnt, thi 

red arld beiieves and on the basis alleges 

standing Itandins ro c,,ê "" -""""" that ua¡ plaintiff 

to sue this '.i- ^..^_- 

lacks 

a¡rswering Defendant with 'arntrfi respect to *. 

lacks 

property described in the complaint. 

DEFEN'E 

For a rwenry-nint*"*t**tffi#"å¿Ïtm;x¡ 

a'swering Dereno*,,, _.,1iî;ïT:ï:ï:;,:ïï:""": *. 

*" basis alleges ::.":*r,:, sought by ptaintiff that aav and all 

are damages 

subjec*o 

" ":;;;::-i_.:.:l 

p,aintìrr and rhis,",*.",, ollj*,iiiiTHffi , .:"î":ïä:,"iä_, 

arbihation pursuant to the cont¡actual arbitration provision. 

For a thirtieth, separate and dir 

THIRTIETH A.F,F'IRIìIIATIVE DEF'ENSE 

(Consent) 

affirmative defense to Defendantariegesthattheactionsr,r¿o-r,.,^--,---*"''urecomplarnt,thisans 

the complaint, 

nrt alieges this 

fhat the eo¡i^^.-^,-:ï" 

answering 

ons taken _-^,¡¡ by er or vr on ru behalfofd oenatlo1 

(nowÌedoc - defendart 

qn,r 

^^..^- , -- *v¡wluúLrll we¡e done oone 

^^- 

with the u 

intiff and that said 

"4rq 

consent wa 

uonsent \¡/as both express and imptied 

THIRTY-¡.IRST 

AF'F,IRMATI}.8 

DEFENSE 

knowledge and consent ofplainfi ff cn,1 +L^+ ^^:, 

o"'oot"o*rro%

19 

20 

21 

22 

z5 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

2 

J 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

i0 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 


For a thiny_third and r 

'"'T-iiÍ).'H,HW##,',",å,?Ì,ljENsE 

ut*ative defense to 

Defendant areges that this urriackssubjectmatter 

"o,tt"tntt jur.r,Ï:îTï:,*Tnî''"n"t 

WHEREFORE, this arrswering 

Defendant prays forjudgrnent r õ, . 

as follows: 

That the Plaintiff take nothing bv w"v 

.o-0,*, 

"¡,r. al""g.ti";;";; 

'n -"- 

2. For an apporticrnment 

of damages in proportion to 

responsible 

the degree 

person 

of fault 

or 

of each 

entity; 

3. Fo¡ costs ofsuit incurred herein; 

4. For ¡easonable attomey,s fees; and 

5. For such other and furtlei 

relief as the court may deem just 

¡__,^, à r1_-^^, 

and 

Dated: prope¡. 

August ?fuJg1g 

NORRIS 

TXWrc/g99358_r

I4 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

I 

,ol 

21 ll 

,"n 

;:n 

*[ 

2s ll 

26il 

,, ll 

28il 


J 

4 

5 

6 

I 

l 

:l 

,ll 

10 

11 

12 

13 

PROOF'OF SER\.ICE 

Terrace, t iõ,ä åil 

courf - '""-"" and Aciiãnîo: santa 

"'ssoclat¡on v. Missio. 

r clar¡ Clara ñ^_-*. County Superior .'_- 

Cor¡rt 

Action No' 110cv172317 

äåÏ{'ii åi'i::* {:':: 1"ïïe or S an ra cru'u uo-"io ers As s o ciarion v. Mis sion 

I, Kathlee.,, r r ^,.J r . , 

I ffi:ijåå:' #J*.{::1* +at r am over the 

åil"å#Jffi cammiá"t''-,ii,j*ÏlllÏ'""ï""'"'J'*"'i:xhi{1trä'j#hï:T't'å:'#Jtr 

¿1å%yåi"rË$Jg:'.,#,î{î.'ff",rîy,i:{#:,,':æçt:il;f 

#ðå"#, 

D.F" RIOS CONSTRUCTIO 

r_..¡r.{Dr MNc.'s ANswER To 

corupraÍNr 

by having I pe¡sonallv dei 

a seafed envelop", ,o ,o"l]j.t^e^d.l-true copy of the docu 

E !v .uu', o**"" 0"," jl"*r'i'' jãiäi'*å::J(ä.åÍ'¿fi';t':T""' encrosed in 

äi"f o:iï:,encrosedi"'.""í"ã;;rop.,1"rh.'-p".|ålöîår":il::iå&:: jtl, 

by ! placing a tuue conv o - a box or o,her ::flf:'I"TïöIii:1,:å:"ffiî:lî'J'3'":T:::n ::fl'å:'J,îåîi:ff raci,i,v 

couri.er or driver *r¡o"1äi igi*;rï:.**i.t"f*"^*Ë'.ä""ï*î#îtïIo,.u 

li,'ÀPress, an express servi 

cnvetope desiønaiert hr, +r.^ ^-/ fne express service carrier recerve 

¡J;"Jtr":.:ïi'::îg;i ji;Äi.ï:::#ï"ffi documents, 

for, addressed"as 

in îJiJ:i1 

a¡ 

;;; fúh ;"åi 

fees paid o. pr*i¿å 

I I eiectronically sewed th 

senrce in rhis action *r."^iojl," .t"frenced docu¡nent(s) throueh ¡l 

TXWLC/99}425_t 

This servic 

compreled on aI parries,i.r.o_,"rïäï"*ùi;;ñ E_ 

:e complles with the court,s order rn this case.

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 


I 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

t4 

15 

76 

17 

18 

19 

Jeffrey A. Bamett. Eso. 

iéì"^?ff "ff i i: s:1" 1 f ,- * 

òan Jose, CA 951 l0_1343 

rer: (408) 441_7800 

¡ax: (408) 44t_7302 

Attomeys for Mission Ter¡ace HOA 

Debra Tipton, Eso. 

Duffy & Guenthei. Lr.p 

t49 Bonifacio plaóe 

Monterey, CA 93940 

Iel: (831) 649_sl0o 

Fax: (831) 649_5102 

Attomeys for Giacalone Eiectric Service 

lvìliam H. Sraples. Eso. 

a¡cher Norris 

2,033 N. Main Sr., Suire 800 

watnut Creek, CA 94596 

tel: (925)930_6600 

tax: (925) 930_6620 

Attomeys for Schindler Elevator 

G. Noel Kidd. Eso. 

Kidd-Carr. LLp ' 

469 9th St., Suire 200 

Oakland, CA94607 

Tel: (510) 268-8600 

.t,ax: (510) 268_8682 

Attomeys for ValderToolen Assoc., Inc. 

r,fti:öf,ätT"Y;Ì:r¿::,, 

walnut c'eer,õãú'iöä 

ter: (925)944_6080 

Iax: (925)256_3110 

TXWIl/99942s_1 

SERVICE LIST 

David R. Sylva, Eso. 

Ueneral Counsel ' 

4O4.Saratoga Avenue, Suite 100 

òanta Ulara, CA 95050 

ret: (408) 98s_6016 

¡ax: (408) 985_6066 

Attomeys for Mission Terace, LLC 

Thomas M. Harrelson, Eso. 

Janme C. Ogando. Eso 

H-arrelson & Associate's 

5J3_Airyort Blvd., Suire 325 

öürngame, CA 94010 

rel: (650) 373_3300 

¡ax: (650) 373_3302 

Attomeys for South Valley plumbing, Lrc. 

Stephen B. Welch. Eso. 

Archer Norris 

?93: N Main Sr., Suire 800 

ì/y alnut C¡eek, CA94596 

rel: (925) 930_6600 

Þax: (925) 930_6620 

Attomeys for Coast Buiiding products 

J-emifer J. Bran¡en, Eso. 

Werl & D¡ape 

23212 }r'rill öreek Drive 

r-aguna Hills, CA92653 

rer (949)837_8200 

!ax: (949) 837_9300 

Attomeys for NTGy Group, Inc. 

17 02--L Meidian a"Ë.. + t O: 

ùan Jose, CA 95125 

Tel: (408) 266-Vn 

r.ax: (408) 302_760s 

**?11?^r_pt n*aissa¡ce Srone Care &

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 


I 

2 

J 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

t7 

18 

19 

i;åit",:î'$:"ffiÏtt"' 

Oaktan¿.-CÀ bã6,1;""" 

Tel: (510) s:z-aJij 

.tax: (510) 839_692s 

Attomeys for Basco Dr¡,"vrail & painting 

Attomey attíri-- 

986 Walsh Avenue 

Santa Clara, Ca öiOso 

rer: (408) 727_5700 

tax: (408)727_0366 

TXWLC/99942'-1 

,_\-ormanA.Filer.E-so--___- 

ðYii::åf ,;rî co'êge atvo, Sre r 370 

Tel: (714) æq_titt 

nax: (714)634_2866 

Attomeys for San Marino plastering 

iäitr#,?ffi¡,Ë,ste 33o 

Tet: (925)ée+_ipsn' 

tax: (925)BB4_2090

to view document - SC Superior Court E-Filing

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?