01.05.2013 Views

Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP

Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP

Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AUGUST 2005 FINAL REPORT<br />

1.4.4 Inherent Problems with Stranding Data<br />

How closely <strong>the</strong> distribution of marine mammal and sea turtle stranding records mirrors <strong>the</strong> actual<br />

occurrence of a species in a given region is often not known. Sick animals may strand well beyond <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

normal range and carcasses may travel long distances be<strong>for</strong>e being noticed by observers. Stranding<br />

frequency in a given area is as much a function of nearshore and offshore current regimes and coastal<br />

zone patrol ef<strong>for</strong>ts as it is a function of <strong>the</strong> stranded species’ actual pattern of occurrence. Since coastal<br />

species will strand more frequently than oceanic species, due to <strong>the</strong>ir closer proximity to shore, stranding<br />

frequencies should not be used when attempting to compare <strong>the</strong> occurrence of a coastal versus an<br />

oceanic stock in a certain area. Comparisons cannot be made between species of differing sizes and<br />

social structures, as strandings of large-bodied species and groups of individuals are much more likely to<br />

be reported than strandings of small-bodied species or single individuals. An additional problem with <strong>the</strong><br />

use of stranding data involves <strong>the</strong> inability of reporters to identify carcasses as a certain species. For<br />

example, only <strong>the</strong> most experienced marine mammal scientists are likely able to differentiate between <strong>the</strong><br />

several species of beaked whale in <strong>the</strong> genus Mesoplodon.<br />

1.5 REPORT ORGANIZATION<br />

This report consists of eight major chapters and associated appendices. Chapter 1⎯Introduction provides<br />

background in<strong>for</strong>mation on this project, an explanation of its purpose and need, a review of relevant<br />

environmental legislation, and a description of <strong>the</strong> methodology used in <strong>the</strong> assessment. Chapter<br />

2⎯Physical Environment and Habitats describes <strong>the</strong> physical environment of <strong>the</strong> study area, including<br />

<strong>the</strong> marine geology (physiography, bathymetry, and bottom sediments), physical oceanography<br />

(circulation and currents), hydrography (surface temperature and salinity), biological oceanography<br />

(plankton), and habitat complexity. It also discusses <strong>the</strong> distribution of nearshore habitats (e.g., rocky and<br />

sandy shore), benthic habitats (e.g., coral reefs, artificial reefs, shipwrecks), and submerged aquatic<br />

vegetation in <strong>the</strong> study area and surrounding region. Chapter 3⎯Species of Concern covers two<br />

protected taxa found in <strong>the</strong> study area: marine mammals and sea turtles. For <strong>the</strong>se species, detailed<br />

narratives of <strong>the</strong>ir morphology, status, habitat preferences, distribution (including migratory patterns),<br />

behavior, life history, and acoustics and hearing (if known) have been provided. Chapter 4⎯Fish and<br />

Fisheries investigates fish, EFH, and fishing activities (commercial and recreational) that occur within <strong>the</strong><br />

study area. Chapter 5⎯Additional Considerations provides in<strong>for</strong>mation on U.S. maritime boundaries,<br />

navigable waterways and commercial shipping lanes, MMAs, and SCUBA diving sites. Chapter<br />

6⎯Recommendations suggests future avenues of research that may fill <strong>the</strong> data gaps identified in this<br />

project and prioritizes research needs from a cost-benefit approach. Chapters 7 and 8 are <strong>the</strong> List of<br />

Preparers and Glossary, respectively. Appendix A includes supplementary materials referred to in <strong>the</strong><br />

Introduction (including a list of marine mammal and sea turtle occurrence data sources) while Appendices<br />

B and C contain occurrence map figures that are described or referenced in <strong>the</strong> marine mammal and sea<br />

turtle sections (3.1 and 3.2, respectively) of Chapter 3. Appendix D includes maps <strong>for</strong> all fishery<br />

management units (e.g., pelagic fish, crustaceans, bottomfish) and ecosystems (e.g., CRE) that have<br />

designated EFH within <strong>the</strong> study area.<br />

This report is written in a <strong>for</strong>mat and reference style similar to that found in The Chicago Manual of Style,<br />

14 th Edition. Cited literature appears at <strong>the</strong> end of each chapter except in Chapter 3, Species of Concern,<br />

where <strong>the</strong> cited literature appears at <strong>the</strong> end of each chapter section.<br />

1.6 LITERATURE CITED<br />

Agardy, T. 2000. Key steps taken to preserve <strong>the</strong> U.S.’s marine heritage. Issues in Science and<br />

Technology 17(1):26.<br />

Barlow, J. 1999. Trackline detection probability <strong>for</strong> long-diving whales. Pages 209-221 in G.W. Garner,<br />

S.C. Amstrup, J.L. Laake, B.F.J. Manly, L.L. McDonald, and D.G. Robertson, eds. <strong>Marine</strong><br />

mammal survey and assessment methods. Rotterdam, Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands: A.A. Balkema.<br />

Central Statistics Division, Department of Commerce. 2001. Saipan population by district. 1980 to 2000.<br />

http://www.commerce.gov.mp/csd/pdfs/map%2000%20spn%20dist.pdf.<br />

1-16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!