Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP
Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP
Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
AUGUST 2005 FINAL REPORT<br />
1.4.4 Inherent Problems with Stranding Data<br />
How closely <strong>the</strong> distribution of marine mammal and sea turtle stranding records mirrors <strong>the</strong> actual<br />
occurrence of a species in a given region is often not known. Sick animals may strand well beyond <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
normal range and carcasses may travel long distances be<strong>for</strong>e being noticed by observers. Stranding<br />
frequency in a given area is as much a function of nearshore and offshore current regimes and coastal<br />
zone patrol ef<strong>for</strong>ts as it is a function of <strong>the</strong> stranded species’ actual pattern of occurrence. Since coastal<br />
species will strand more frequently than oceanic species, due to <strong>the</strong>ir closer proximity to shore, stranding<br />
frequencies should not be used when attempting to compare <strong>the</strong> occurrence of a coastal versus an<br />
oceanic stock in a certain area. Comparisons cannot be made between species of differing sizes and<br />
social structures, as strandings of large-bodied species and groups of individuals are much more likely to<br />
be reported than strandings of small-bodied species or single individuals. An additional problem with <strong>the</strong><br />
use of stranding data involves <strong>the</strong> inability of reporters to identify carcasses as a certain species. For<br />
example, only <strong>the</strong> most experienced marine mammal scientists are likely able to differentiate between <strong>the</strong><br />
several species of beaked whale in <strong>the</strong> genus Mesoplodon.<br />
1.5 REPORT ORGANIZATION<br />
This report consists of eight major chapters and associated appendices. Chapter 1⎯Introduction provides<br />
background in<strong>for</strong>mation on this project, an explanation of its purpose and need, a review of relevant<br />
environmental legislation, and a description of <strong>the</strong> methodology used in <strong>the</strong> assessment. Chapter<br />
2⎯Physical Environment and Habitats describes <strong>the</strong> physical environment of <strong>the</strong> study area, including<br />
<strong>the</strong> marine geology (physiography, bathymetry, and bottom sediments), physical oceanography<br />
(circulation and currents), hydrography (surface temperature and salinity), biological oceanography<br />
(plankton), and habitat complexity. It also discusses <strong>the</strong> distribution of nearshore habitats (e.g., rocky and<br />
sandy shore), benthic habitats (e.g., coral reefs, artificial reefs, shipwrecks), and submerged aquatic<br />
vegetation in <strong>the</strong> study area and surrounding region. Chapter 3⎯Species of Concern covers two<br />
protected taxa found in <strong>the</strong> study area: marine mammals and sea turtles. For <strong>the</strong>se species, detailed<br />
narratives of <strong>the</strong>ir morphology, status, habitat preferences, distribution (including migratory patterns),<br />
behavior, life history, and acoustics and hearing (if known) have been provided. Chapter 4⎯Fish and<br />
Fisheries investigates fish, EFH, and fishing activities (commercial and recreational) that occur within <strong>the</strong><br />
study area. Chapter 5⎯Additional Considerations provides in<strong>for</strong>mation on U.S. maritime boundaries,<br />
navigable waterways and commercial shipping lanes, MMAs, and SCUBA diving sites. Chapter<br />
6⎯Recommendations suggests future avenues of research that may fill <strong>the</strong> data gaps identified in this<br />
project and prioritizes research needs from a cost-benefit approach. Chapters 7 and 8 are <strong>the</strong> List of<br />
Preparers and Glossary, respectively. Appendix A includes supplementary materials referred to in <strong>the</strong><br />
Introduction (including a list of marine mammal and sea turtle occurrence data sources) while Appendices<br />
B and C contain occurrence map figures that are described or referenced in <strong>the</strong> marine mammal and sea<br />
turtle sections (3.1 and 3.2, respectively) of Chapter 3. Appendix D includes maps <strong>for</strong> all fishery<br />
management units (e.g., pelagic fish, crustaceans, bottomfish) and ecosystems (e.g., CRE) that have<br />
designated EFH within <strong>the</strong> study area.<br />
This report is written in a <strong>for</strong>mat and reference style similar to that found in The Chicago Manual of Style,<br />
14 th Edition. Cited literature appears at <strong>the</strong> end of each chapter except in Chapter 3, Species of Concern,<br />
where <strong>the</strong> cited literature appears at <strong>the</strong> end of each chapter section.<br />
1.6 LITERATURE CITED<br />
Agardy, T. 2000. Key steps taken to preserve <strong>the</strong> U.S.’s marine heritage. Issues in Science and<br />
Technology 17(1):26.<br />
Barlow, J. 1999. Trackline detection probability <strong>for</strong> long-diving whales. Pages 209-221 in G.W. Garner,<br />
S.C. Amstrup, J.L. Laake, B.F.J. Manly, L.L. McDonald, and D.G. Robertson, eds. <strong>Marine</strong><br />
mammal survey and assessment methods. Rotterdam, Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands: A.A. Balkema.<br />
Central Statistics Division, Department of Commerce. 2001. Saipan population by district. 1980 to 2000.<br />
http://www.commerce.gov.mp/csd/pdfs/map%2000%20spn%20dist.pdf.<br />
1-16