Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP
Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP
Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
AUGUST 2005 FINAL REPORT<br />
or in<strong>for</strong>mation extracted from a literature description are referenced as source in<strong>for</strong>mation. In certain<br />
cases, source maps and/or in<strong>for</strong>mation had to be interpreted to be usable in <strong>the</strong> GIS environment. Maps<br />
displaying geographic in<strong>for</strong>mation that was interpreted or altered from <strong>the</strong> original source map/in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
are noted in <strong>the</strong> figure caption as being “adapted from” that source.<br />
The source type and associated references <strong>for</strong> all marine resources data presented in <strong>the</strong> map figures<br />
are listed in each figure’s caption. The full reference citations <strong>for</strong> map source data or in<strong>for</strong>mation may be<br />
found in <strong>the</strong> Literature Cited section of each MRA chapter. The two primary types of spatial in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
used in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Marianas</strong> MRA were coordinate data and scanned maps. These two source types are<br />
associated with differing levels of data reliability or confidence (Appendix A-1 contains a fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
explanation of data confidence). Numerical or au<strong>the</strong>ntic data are associated with <strong>the</strong> highest level of<br />
reliability, while data obtained by scanning source maps are less reliable.<br />
Problems were encountered when data sets were combined during <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> map figures.<br />
Source data were not in a standard <strong>for</strong>mat, <strong>the</strong>re was no standard naming convention <strong>for</strong> species names,<br />
and some data sets included missing or unlabeled data fields. To mitigate <strong>the</strong>se difficulties, many steps<br />
were taken to standardize and control <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong> numerical data, especially <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> marine mammal<br />
and sea turtle data. Prior to using <strong>the</strong> data, a master database was created in Microsoft ® Access where<br />
<strong>the</strong> data <strong>for</strong>mat was standardized so that <strong>the</strong> data could be merged and later used in <strong>the</strong> GIS. To<br />
accomplish this, data were manipulated to match data set records with a set of standard field names. In<br />
some cases, <strong>the</strong> latitude and longitude had to be converted to decimal degrees with accuracy to <strong>the</strong><br />
fourth decimal place. Species’ common names were added to <strong>the</strong> database to replace <strong>the</strong> multiple<br />
species codes that accompanied <strong>the</strong> original data. The different types of codes used <strong>for</strong> species names in<br />
<strong>the</strong> original data sets were not always consistent from one data set to <strong>the</strong> next. Compiling a<br />
comprehensive list of species names increased <strong>the</strong> chances of plotting all sightings <strong>for</strong> a given species on<br />
<strong>the</strong> map figures. To maintain <strong>the</strong> integrity of <strong>the</strong> original data, all fields and records were kept without<br />
alteration. When necessary, fields were created to store supplemental in<strong>for</strong>mation or data that was<br />
altered from <strong>the</strong> original source. No original data fields were deleted and all added fields are signified by<br />
<strong>the</strong> “GMI_” prefix (GMI: Geo-<strong>Marine</strong>, Inc.). For example, source fields were added to <strong>the</strong> main data set to<br />
indicate <strong>the</strong> origin of <strong>the</strong> data and are shown in <strong>the</strong> field as “GMI_source.”<br />
GIS data are displayed as layers or "<strong>the</strong>mes" <strong>for</strong> which scale, extent, and display characteristics can be<br />
specified. Multiple <strong>the</strong>mes are represented on an individual map figure. Throughout <strong>the</strong> project, data<br />
imported into ArcView ® had to be maintained in <strong>the</strong> most universal, least trans<strong>for</strong>med manner in order to<br />
avoid conflict between <strong>the</strong>me coordinate systems and projections. In <strong>the</strong> GIS, <strong>the</strong> most flexible spatial<br />
data <strong>for</strong>mat is <strong>the</strong> unprojected geographic coordinate system, which uses decimal-degree latitude and<br />
longitude coordinates (Appendix A-2 contains more in<strong>for</strong>mation on map projections). The decimaldegree<br />
<strong>for</strong>mat is <strong>the</strong> only coordinate system <strong>for</strong>mat that allows unlimited, temporary, custom projection<br />
and re-projection in ArcView ® and is, <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> least restrictive spatial data <strong>for</strong>mat. The printed maps<br />
and electronic GIS map data <strong>for</strong> this MRA report are unprojected and are not as spatially precise (in<br />
terms of distance, area, and shape) as a projected map. Consequently, <strong>the</strong> maps should not be used <strong>for</strong><br />
measurement or analysis.<br />
Once <strong>the</strong> marine resources data were imported and stored in <strong>the</strong> GIS, maps were created representing<br />
multiple layers of ei<strong>the</strong>r individual or combined data. Maps in this report are presented in several different<br />
<strong>for</strong>ms and scales, depending upon <strong>the</strong> marine resource in question. Full-page maps of <strong>the</strong> entire study<br />
area region, from FDM to <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn boundary of Warning Area W-517, are at <strong>the</strong> approximate scale of<br />
1:3,289,000. At this scale, it is difficult to visualize <strong>the</strong> distributions of marine resources that are located in<br />
nearshore environments. As a result, a number of maps include zoomed in views of Guam, Tinian, and<br />
FDM so that <strong>the</strong> locations of certain coastal resources in Apra Harbor, Agat Bay, off Andersen Air Force<br />
Base, and around Tinian and FDM can be more easily viewed. The maps in this MRA report are<br />
presented in both kilometers and nautical miles.<br />
The ability to display and analyze multiple data <strong>the</strong>mes or layers simultaneously is one of <strong>the</strong> advantages<br />
to using a GIS ra<strong>the</strong>r than o<strong>the</strong>r graphic software. Customizations were made to <strong>the</strong> software in Avenue ® ,<br />
1-12