01.05.2013 Views

Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP

Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP

Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AUGUST 2005 FINAL REPORT<br />

or in<strong>for</strong>mation extracted from a literature description are referenced as source in<strong>for</strong>mation. In certain<br />

cases, source maps and/or in<strong>for</strong>mation had to be interpreted to be usable in <strong>the</strong> GIS environment. Maps<br />

displaying geographic in<strong>for</strong>mation that was interpreted or altered from <strong>the</strong> original source map/in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

are noted in <strong>the</strong> figure caption as being “adapted from” that source.<br />

The source type and associated references <strong>for</strong> all marine resources data presented in <strong>the</strong> map figures<br />

are listed in each figure’s caption. The full reference citations <strong>for</strong> map source data or in<strong>for</strong>mation may be<br />

found in <strong>the</strong> Literature Cited section of each MRA chapter. The two primary types of spatial in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

used in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Marianas</strong> MRA were coordinate data and scanned maps. These two source types are<br />

associated with differing levels of data reliability or confidence (Appendix A-1 contains a fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

explanation of data confidence). Numerical or au<strong>the</strong>ntic data are associated with <strong>the</strong> highest level of<br />

reliability, while data obtained by scanning source maps are less reliable.<br />

Problems were encountered when data sets were combined during <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> map figures.<br />

Source data were not in a standard <strong>for</strong>mat, <strong>the</strong>re was no standard naming convention <strong>for</strong> species names,<br />

and some data sets included missing or unlabeled data fields. To mitigate <strong>the</strong>se difficulties, many steps<br />

were taken to standardize and control <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong> numerical data, especially <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> marine mammal<br />

and sea turtle data. Prior to using <strong>the</strong> data, a master database was created in Microsoft ® Access where<br />

<strong>the</strong> data <strong>for</strong>mat was standardized so that <strong>the</strong> data could be merged and later used in <strong>the</strong> GIS. To<br />

accomplish this, data were manipulated to match data set records with a set of standard field names. In<br />

some cases, <strong>the</strong> latitude and longitude had to be converted to decimal degrees with accuracy to <strong>the</strong><br />

fourth decimal place. Species’ common names were added to <strong>the</strong> database to replace <strong>the</strong> multiple<br />

species codes that accompanied <strong>the</strong> original data. The different types of codes used <strong>for</strong> species names in<br />

<strong>the</strong> original data sets were not always consistent from one data set to <strong>the</strong> next. Compiling a<br />

comprehensive list of species names increased <strong>the</strong> chances of plotting all sightings <strong>for</strong> a given species on<br />

<strong>the</strong> map figures. To maintain <strong>the</strong> integrity of <strong>the</strong> original data, all fields and records were kept without<br />

alteration. When necessary, fields were created to store supplemental in<strong>for</strong>mation or data that was<br />

altered from <strong>the</strong> original source. No original data fields were deleted and all added fields are signified by<br />

<strong>the</strong> “GMI_” prefix (GMI: Geo-<strong>Marine</strong>, Inc.). For example, source fields were added to <strong>the</strong> main data set to<br />

indicate <strong>the</strong> origin of <strong>the</strong> data and are shown in <strong>the</strong> field as “GMI_source.”<br />

GIS data are displayed as layers or "<strong>the</strong>mes" <strong>for</strong> which scale, extent, and display characteristics can be<br />

specified. Multiple <strong>the</strong>mes are represented on an individual map figure. Throughout <strong>the</strong> project, data<br />

imported into ArcView ® had to be maintained in <strong>the</strong> most universal, least trans<strong>for</strong>med manner in order to<br />

avoid conflict between <strong>the</strong>me coordinate systems and projections. In <strong>the</strong> GIS, <strong>the</strong> most flexible spatial<br />

data <strong>for</strong>mat is <strong>the</strong> unprojected geographic coordinate system, which uses decimal-degree latitude and<br />

longitude coordinates (Appendix A-2 contains more in<strong>for</strong>mation on map projections). The decimaldegree<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat is <strong>the</strong> only coordinate system <strong>for</strong>mat that allows unlimited, temporary, custom projection<br />

and re-projection in ArcView ® and is, <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> least restrictive spatial data <strong>for</strong>mat. The printed maps<br />

and electronic GIS map data <strong>for</strong> this MRA report are unprojected and are not as spatially precise (in<br />

terms of distance, area, and shape) as a projected map. Consequently, <strong>the</strong> maps should not be used <strong>for</strong><br />

measurement or analysis.<br />

Once <strong>the</strong> marine resources data were imported and stored in <strong>the</strong> GIS, maps were created representing<br />

multiple layers of ei<strong>the</strong>r individual or combined data. Maps in this report are presented in several different<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms and scales, depending upon <strong>the</strong> marine resource in question. Full-page maps of <strong>the</strong> entire study<br />

area region, from FDM to <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn boundary of Warning Area W-517, are at <strong>the</strong> approximate scale of<br />

1:3,289,000. At this scale, it is difficult to visualize <strong>the</strong> distributions of marine resources that are located in<br />

nearshore environments. As a result, a number of maps include zoomed in views of Guam, Tinian, and<br />

FDM so that <strong>the</strong> locations of certain coastal resources in Apra Harbor, Agat Bay, off Andersen Air Force<br />

Base, and around Tinian and FDM can be more easily viewed. The maps in this MRA report are<br />

presented in both kilometers and nautical miles.<br />

The ability to display and analyze multiple data <strong>the</strong>mes or layers simultaneously is one of <strong>the</strong> advantages<br />

to using a GIS ra<strong>the</strong>r than o<strong>the</strong>r graphic software. Customizations were made to <strong>the</strong> software in Avenue ® ,<br />

1-12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!