Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP
Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP
Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
AUGUST 2005 FINAL REPORT<br />
Bibliography, WhaleNet, InnerCity Oz, <strong>the</strong> National Sea Grant Library, Ingenta, AVISO, <strong>the</strong><br />
International Union <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Conservation of Nature and Natural <strong>Resources</strong> (IUCN);<br />
International agencies and commissions: International Whaling Commission (IWC), United Nations<br />
Environment Programme (UNEP), Pacific Regional Environment Programme (<strong>for</strong>merly known as <strong>the</strong><br />
South Pacific Regional Environment Programme [<strong>SPREP</strong>]);<br />
U.S. federal agencies: DoD; DoN: Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific; DoN: Naval Pacific<br />
Meteorological and Oceanography Center, Navy Exchange Dive Center Guam; <strong>Marine</strong> Mammal<br />
Commission (MMC); Minerals Management Service (MMS); National Aeronautic and Space<br />
Administration (NASA); National Park Service (NPS); NOAA Fisheries: Pacific Islands Regional Office<br />
(PIRO), Office of Protected <strong>Resources</strong>, Office of Habitat Conservation, Southwest Fisheries Science<br />
Center (SWFSC), PIFSC; NOAA: National Ocean Service (NOS), Sustainable Seas Expedition,<br />
National MPA Center, National <strong>Marine</strong> Mammal Laboratory (NMML), Western Pacific Regional<br />
Fishery Management Council (WPRFMC), National Data Buoy Center; USFWS: Refuges Division,<br />
Ecological Field Services Office, Guam National Wildlife Refuge;<br />
U.S. commonwealth and territory agencies: Guam Bureau of Statistics and Plans, Guam Division of<br />
Aquatic and Wildlife <strong>Resources</strong> (DAWR), Guam Environmental Protection Agency, CNMI Coastal<br />
<strong>Resources</strong> Management Office, CNMI Division of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), CNMI Division of<br />
Environmental Quality; and<br />
Local dive shops and tour operators: Dive Rota, Micronesian Divers Association, and Guam Tropical<br />
Dive Station.<br />
1.4.2 Spatial Data Representation⎯Geographic In<strong>for</strong>mation System<br />
The geographical representation of marine resource occurrences in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Marianas</strong> MRA study area was a<br />
major constituent of this MRA report. The marine resources data and in<strong>for</strong>mation accumulated <strong>for</strong> this<br />
project were accessed from a wide variety of sources, were in disparate <strong>for</strong>mats, covered a broad range<br />
of time periods, and represented differing levels of accuracy as well as quality assurance. The spatial or<br />
geographical component that was common to all data sets allowed <strong>the</strong> widely dissimilar data to be<br />
visualized in a meaningful manner. Without this common data characteristic, graphical display of such<br />
disparate data would have been difficult, if not impossible, to achieve.<br />
A GIS was used to store, manipulate, analyze, and visualize <strong>the</strong> spatial data and in<strong>for</strong>mation accumulated<br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> study area. For this project, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.'s (ESRI) ArcView ®<br />
version 3.2 GIS software was used to create <strong>the</strong> majority of map figures and ArcView ® version 8.2 was<br />
used to create <strong>the</strong> metadata as well as some features of <strong>the</strong> three-dimensional map figures. ArcView ®<br />
was chosen <strong>for</strong> this project due to its widespread use, ease of operation, and its ability to create multiple<br />
views and layouts within <strong>the</strong> same project file.<br />
The geographic locations of important marine resources in <strong>the</strong> study area were derived from four types of<br />
sources (in order of reliability): source data, scanned source maps, source in<strong>for</strong>mation, and in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
adapted from published maps. The “source data,” which include geographic coordinates and GIS<br />
shapefiles, were first scrutinized <strong>for</strong> data quality. If <strong>the</strong> data were in coordinate <strong>for</strong>m, <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>the</strong>n<br />
converted to decimal degrees, if necessary, and text fields were renamed or added <strong>for</strong> ease of<br />
manipulation. Once standardized, <strong>the</strong> source data were imported into <strong>the</strong> GIS software. Some of <strong>the</strong> data<br />
were only available as graphical representations or “source maps.” These data were scanned, imported<br />
into ArcView ® , and geo-referenced using <strong>the</strong> Image Analysis extension, with significant in<strong>for</strong>mation being<br />
digitized into a shapefile <strong>for</strong>mat. Materials acquired as Adobe ® Portable Document Format (PDF) files<br />
were also treated as scanned source maps (i.e., <strong>the</strong>y were geo-referenced and pertinent in<strong>for</strong>mation was<br />
digitized), since <strong>the</strong>y were already in a digital <strong>for</strong>m. A third type of source, “source in<strong>for</strong>mation,”<br />
encompasses in<strong>for</strong>mation that was nei<strong>the</strong>r taken from a scanned map nor was available in coordinate<br />
<strong>for</strong>m. For example, maps displaying non-coordinate data, in<strong>for</strong>mation given via personal communication,<br />
1-11