01.05.2013 Views

Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP

Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP

Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AUGUST 2005 FINAL REPORT<br />

Table 1-1. The threatened and endangered species with potential occurrence in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Marianas</strong><br />

<strong>Marine</strong> Resource <strong>Assessment</strong> (MRA) study area. <strong>Marine</strong> mammals taxonomy follows Rice (1998)<br />

<strong>for</strong> pinnipeds and sirenians and IWC (2004) <strong>for</strong> cetaceans except <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> North Pacific right whale,<br />

which was revised by Rosenbaum et al. (2000). Sea turtle taxonomy follows Pritchard (1997).<br />

[ 1 Although <strong>the</strong> species as a whole is listed as threatened, <strong>the</strong> Mexican Pacific nesting stock of <strong>the</strong> green turtle is<br />

listed as endangered. A risk-averse approach requires <strong>the</strong> assumption that at-sea animals encountered in <strong>the</strong> study<br />

area may come from <strong>the</strong> Mexican Pacific population and are <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e endangered]<br />

<strong>Marine</strong> Mammals<br />

North Pacific right whale Eubalaena japonica Endangered<br />

Humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae Endangered<br />

Sei whale Balaenoptera borealis Endangered<br />

Fin whale Balaenoptera physalus Endangered<br />

Blue whale Balaenoptera musculus Endangered<br />

Sperm whale Physeter macrocephalus Endangered<br />

Hawaiian monk seal Monachus schlauinslandi Endangered<br />

Dugong Dugong dugon Endangered<br />

Sea Turtles<br />

Green turtle Chelonia mydas Threatened 1<br />

Hawksbill turtle Eretmochelys imbricata Endangered<br />

Loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta Threatened<br />

Olive ridley turtle Lepidochelys olivacea Threatened<br />

Lea<strong>the</strong>rback turtle Dermochelys coriacea Endangered<br />

regional management system began allocating harvesting rights, with priority given to domestic<br />

enterprises. Since a substantial portion of fishery resources in offshore waters was allocated <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong>eign harvest, <strong>the</strong>se <strong>for</strong>eign allocations were eventually reduced as domestic fish harvesting and<br />

processing industries expanded under <strong>the</strong> domestic preference authorized by <strong>the</strong> MSFCMA. At that<br />

time, exclusive federal management authority over U.S. domestic fisheries resources was vested in<br />

<strong>the</strong> NMFS.<br />

The authority to place observers on commercial fishing and processing vessels operating in specific<br />

geographic areas is also provided by <strong>the</strong> MSFCMA. The data collected by <strong>the</strong> National Observer<br />

Program, which is overseen by <strong>the</strong> NMFS, is often <strong>the</strong> best means to get current data on <strong>the</strong> status of<br />

many fisheries. Without observers and observer programs, <strong>the</strong>re would not be sufficient fisheries data<br />

<strong>for</strong> effective management. Observer programs also satisfy requirements of <strong>the</strong> ESA and MMPA by<br />

documenting incidental fisheries bycatch of federally protected species, such as marine mammals<br />

and sea turtles.<br />

In 1977, Congress addressed <strong>the</strong> heightened concern over water pollution by amending <strong>the</strong> Federal<br />

Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) of 1948 (33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq.). The 1977 amendments,<br />

known as <strong>the</strong> Clean Water Act (CWA), extensively amended <strong>the</strong> FWPCA. For a synopsis of FWPCA<br />

initiatives prior to 1977, consult USFWS (2003b), which documents <strong>the</strong> history of <strong>the</strong> FWPCA since<br />

its origin.<br />

The CWA took <strong>the</strong> first step towards establishing a comprehensive solution to <strong>the</strong> country’s serious<br />

water pollution problems (EPA 2003). Through standards, technical tools, and financial assistance,<br />

<strong>the</strong> CWA works towards <strong>the</strong> accomplishment of two goals: (1) to make U.S. waters fishable and<br />

swimmable and (2) to eliminate contaminant discharge into such waters. Under <strong>the</strong> authority of <strong>the</strong><br />

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), <strong>the</strong> act sets water quality standards <strong>for</strong> all pollutants,<br />

requires a permit <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> discharge of pollutants from a point source, and funds sewage treatment<br />

plant construction (EPA 2003). Section 403 of <strong>the</strong> CWA sets out permit guidelines specific to <strong>the</strong><br />

1-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!