01.05.2013 Views

Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP

Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP

Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AUGUST 2005 FINAL REPORT<br />

maintenance of fish and wildlife resources on military reservations throughout <strong>the</strong> U.S. This is<br />

accomplished through <strong>the</strong> creation of integrated natural resource management plans (INRMP), which<br />

are long-term planning documents that provide recommendations on managing natural resources. As<br />

required by <strong>the</strong> Sikes Act Improvement Act of 1997, <strong>the</strong> INRMP must, to <strong>the</strong> extent appropriate and<br />

applicable, provide <strong>for</strong>: 1) fish and wildlife management, land management, <strong>for</strong>est management, and<br />

fish- and wildlife-oriented recreation; 2) fish and wildlife habitat enhancement or modification; 3)<br />

wetland protection, enhancement, and restoration, where necessary <strong>for</strong> support of fish, wildlife, or<br />

plants; 4) integration of, and consistency among, <strong>the</strong> various activities conducted under <strong>the</strong> plan; 5)<br />

establishment of specific natural resources management goals and objectives and time frames <strong>for</strong><br />

proposed actions; 6) sustainable use by <strong>the</strong> public of natural resources to <strong>the</strong> extent that <strong>the</strong> use is<br />

not inconsistent with <strong>the</strong> needs of fish and wildlife resources; 7) public access to <strong>the</strong> military<br />

installation that is necessary or appropriate <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> sustainable use of natural resources, subject to<br />

requirements necessary to ensure safety and military security; 8) en<strong>for</strong>cement of applicable natural<br />

resource laws (including regulations); 9) no net loss in <strong>the</strong> capability of <strong>the</strong> installation’s lands to<br />

support <strong>the</strong> military mission of <strong>the</strong> installation; and 10) such o<strong>the</strong>r activities as <strong>the</strong> military has<br />

determined appropriate.<br />

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq.) established<br />

national policies and goals <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> protection of <strong>the</strong> environment. The NEPA aims to encourage<br />

harmony between people and <strong>the</strong> environment, to promote ef<strong>for</strong>ts to prevent or eliminate damage to<br />

<strong>the</strong> environment and <strong>the</strong> biosphere, and to enrich <strong>the</strong> understanding of ecological systems and<br />

natural resources important to <strong>the</strong> country. Thus, environmental factors must be given appropriate<br />

consideration in all decisions made by federal agencies.<br />

The NEPA is divided into two sections: Title I outlines a basic national charter <strong>for</strong> protection of <strong>the</strong><br />

environment, while Title II establishes <strong>the</strong> Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), which monitors<br />

<strong>the</strong> progress made towards achieving <strong>the</strong> goals set <strong>for</strong>th in Section 101 of <strong>the</strong> NEPA. O<strong>the</strong>r duties of<br />

<strong>the</strong> CEQ include advising <strong>the</strong> President on environmental issues and providing guidance to o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

federal agencies on compliance with <strong>the</strong> NEPA.<br />

Section 102(2) of <strong>the</strong> NEPA contains "action-<strong>for</strong>cing" provisions that ensure that federal agencies act<br />

according to <strong>the</strong> letter and <strong>the</strong> spirit of <strong>the</strong> law. These procedural requirements direct all federal<br />

agencies to give appropriate consideration to <strong>the</strong> environmental effects and cumulative impacts of<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir decision-making and to prepare detailed environmental statements on recommendations or<br />

reports on proposals <strong>for</strong> legislation and o<strong>the</strong>r major federal actions significantly affecting <strong>the</strong> quality of<br />

<strong>the</strong> environment.<br />

Future studies and/or actions requiring federal compliance which may utilize <strong>the</strong> data contained in this<br />

MRA should be prepared in accordance with Section 102(2)(c) of <strong>the</strong> NEPA, <strong>the</strong> CEQ regulations on<br />

implementing NEPA procedures (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 1500-1508), and <strong>the</strong><br />

Department of <strong>the</strong> Navy (DoN) regulations on implementing NEPA procedures (32 CFR 775).<br />

The <strong>Marine</strong> Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) of 1972 (16 U.S.C. §§ 1361 et seq.) established a<br />

moratorium on <strong>the</strong> “taking” of marine mammals in waters or on lands under U.S. jurisdiction. The<br />

MMPA defines taking as “harassing, hunting, capturing, killing, or attempting to harass, hunt, capture,<br />

or kill any marine mammal” (16 U.S.C. 1312[13]). It also prohibits <strong>the</strong> importation into <strong>the</strong> U.S. of any<br />

marine mammal or parts or products <strong>the</strong>reof, unless it is <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> purpose of scientific research or<br />

public display, as permitted by <strong>the</strong> Secretary of <strong>the</strong> Interior or <strong>the</strong> Secretary of Commerce. In <strong>the</strong><br />

1994 amendments to <strong>the</strong> MMPA, two levels of “harassment” were defined. Harassment is defined as<br />

any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance that has <strong>the</strong> potential to injure a marine mammal or marine<br />

mammal stock in <strong>the</strong> wild (Level A), or any act that has <strong>the</strong> potential to disturb a marine mammal or<br />

marine mammal stock in <strong>the</strong> wild by disrupting behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to<br />

migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering (Level B). In 2003, <strong>the</strong> National<br />

Defense Authorization Act <strong>for</strong> Fiscal Year 2004 altered <strong>the</strong> MMPA’s definition of Level A and B<br />

harassment in regards to military readiness and scientific research activities conducted by or on<br />

behalf of <strong>the</strong> Federal Government. Under <strong>the</strong>se changes, Level A harassment was redefined as any<br />

1-4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!