Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP
Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP
Marine Resources Assessment for the Marianas Operating ... - SPREP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
AUGUST 2005 FINAL REPORT<br />
maintenance of fish and wildlife resources on military reservations throughout <strong>the</strong> U.S. This is<br />
accomplished through <strong>the</strong> creation of integrated natural resource management plans (INRMP), which<br />
are long-term planning documents that provide recommendations on managing natural resources. As<br />
required by <strong>the</strong> Sikes Act Improvement Act of 1997, <strong>the</strong> INRMP must, to <strong>the</strong> extent appropriate and<br />
applicable, provide <strong>for</strong>: 1) fish and wildlife management, land management, <strong>for</strong>est management, and<br />
fish- and wildlife-oriented recreation; 2) fish and wildlife habitat enhancement or modification; 3)<br />
wetland protection, enhancement, and restoration, where necessary <strong>for</strong> support of fish, wildlife, or<br />
plants; 4) integration of, and consistency among, <strong>the</strong> various activities conducted under <strong>the</strong> plan; 5)<br />
establishment of specific natural resources management goals and objectives and time frames <strong>for</strong><br />
proposed actions; 6) sustainable use by <strong>the</strong> public of natural resources to <strong>the</strong> extent that <strong>the</strong> use is<br />
not inconsistent with <strong>the</strong> needs of fish and wildlife resources; 7) public access to <strong>the</strong> military<br />
installation that is necessary or appropriate <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> sustainable use of natural resources, subject to<br />
requirements necessary to ensure safety and military security; 8) en<strong>for</strong>cement of applicable natural<br />
resource laws (including regulations); 9) no net loss in <strong>the</strong> capability of <strong>the</strong> installation’s lands to<br />
support <strong>the</strong> military mission of <strong>the</strong> installation; and 10) such o<strong>the</strong>r activities as <strong>the</strong> military has<br />
determined appropriate.<br />
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq.) established<br />
national policies and goals <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> protection of <strong>the</strong> environment. The NEPA aims to encourage<br />
harmony between people and <strong>the</strong> environment, to promote ef<strong>for</strong>ts to prevent or eliminate damage to<br />
<strong>the</strong> environment and <strong>the</strong> biosphere, and to enrich <strong>the</strong> understanding of ecological systems and<br />
natural resources important to <strong>the</strong> country. Thus, environmental factors must be given appropriate<br />
consideration in all decisions made by federal agencies.<br />
The NEPA is divided into two sections: Title I outlines a basic national charter <strong>for</strong> protection of <strong>the</strong><br />
environment, while Title II establishes <strong>the</strong> Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), which monitors<br />
<strong>the</strong> progress made towards achieving <strong>the</strong> goals set <strong>for</strong>th in Section 101 of <strong>the</strong> NEPA. O<strong>the</strong>r duties of<br />
<strong>the</strong> CEQ include advising <strong>the</strong> President on environmental issues and providing guidance to o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
federal agencies on compliance with <strong>the</strong> NEPA.<br />
Section 102(2) of <strong>the</strong> NEPA contains "action-<strong>for</strong>cing" provisions that ensure that federal agencies act<br />
according to <strong>the</strong> letter and <strong>the</strong> spirit of <strong>the</strong> law. These procedural requirements direct all federal<br />
agencies to give appropriate consideration to <strong>the</strong> environmental effects and cumulative impacts of<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir decision-making and to prepare detailed environmental statements on recommendations or<br />
reports on proposals <strong>for</strong> legislation and o<strong>the</strong>r major federal actions significantly affecting <strong>the</strong> quality of<br />
<strong>the</strong> environment.<br />
Future studies and/or actions requiring federal compliance which may utilize <strong>the</strong> data contained in this<br />
MRA should be prepared in accordance with Section 102(2)(c) of <strong>the</strong> NEPA, <strong>the</strong> CEQ regulations on<br />
implementing NEPA procedures (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 1500-1508), and <strong>the</strong><br />
Department of <strong>the</strong> Navy (DoN) regulations on implementing NEPA procedures (32 CFR 775).<br />
The <strong>Marine</strong> Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) of 1972 (16 U.S.C. §§ 1361 et seq.) established a<br />
moratorium on <strong>the</strong> “taking” of marine mammals in waters or on lands under U.S. jurisdiction. The<br />
MMPA defines taking as “harassing, hunting, capturing, killing, or attempting to harass, hunt, capture,<br />
or kill any marine mammal” (16 U.S.C. 1312[13]). It also prohibits <strong>the</strong> importation into <strong>the</strong> U.S. of any<br />
marine mammal or parts or products <strong>the</strong>reof, unless it is <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> purpose of scientific research or<br />
public display, as permitted by <strong>the</strong> Secretary of <strong>the</strong> Interior or <strong>the</strong> Secretary of Commerce. In <strong>the</strong><br />
1994 amendments to <strong>the</strong> MMPA, two levels of “harassment” were defined. Harassment is defined as<br />
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance that has <strong>the</strong> potential to injure a marine mammal or marine<br />
mammal stock in <strong>the</strong> wild (Level A), or any act that has <strong>the</strong> potential to disturb a marine mammal or<br />
marine mammal stock in <strong>the</strong> wild by disrupting behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to<br />
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering (Level B). In 2003, <strong>the</strong> National<br />
Defense Authorization Act <strong>for</strong> Fiscal Year 2004 altered <strong>the</strong> MMPA’s definition of Level A and B<br />
harassment in regards to military readiness and scientific research activities conducted by or on<br />
behalf of <strong>the</strong> Federal Government. Under <strong>the</strong>se changes, Level A harassment was redefined as any<br />
1-4