01.05.2013 Views

LILIES - RHS Lily Group

LILIES - RHS Lily Group

LILIES - RHS Lily Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

or Cliftonii <strong>Group</strong> in gardening circles, is horticulturally distinct in that it flowers<br />

noticeably earlier, in fact one of the earliest of all erythroniums, and in my<br />

experience does not have the same propensity to produce stolons.<br />

The unique pink E. revolutum is perhaps the most prolific species in Britain,<br />

especially in the higher rainfall western side of the country. One can see large<br />

drifts in many gardens ranging from the south-west (for example Knightshayes)<br />

all the way up to north-western Scotland at Inverewe. As a wild plant it is also<br />

widespread in a north-south direction at fairly low altitudes from Vancouver<br />

Island to California, and it is very variable. The species is almost entirely<br />

seed propagated so named variants are not clonal although some breed true<br />

enough and have been given cultivar status. So, we have dark pink ones named<br />

‘Johnsonii’ (this was originally described as a species) and other shades such<br />

as ‘Knightshayes Pink’, ‘Pink Beauty’, ‘Rose Beauty’, etc. Species such as this<br />

create a dilemma for those assessing the merits of a plant for the AGM. Should<br />

the award be given to the entire species encompassing all its variations, even if<br />

some might be less pleasing than others, or should only ‘the better’ variants be<br />

acknowledged? There is no real answer but the matter can usually be resolved by<br />

asking oneself: ‘would I throw out any form of E. revolutum on the grounds that<br />

it was inferior?’ In this case I suspect that the answer from most people would be<br />

a resounding ‘no way’! This question does not arise in the case of E. hendersonii,<br />

another western American species which is more restricted in distribution in<br />

southern Oregon and northern California. It varies only a little in the depth of<br />

pale lavender-violet of its flowers which have a distinct dark violet eye in the<br />

centre, a unique colour combination in the genus. As a result of this comparative<br />

uniformity I am unaware of any named cultivars. As with E. revolutum there is<br />

little tendency for the bulbs to produce offsets, so seeds are the only practical<br />

method of propagation.<br />

All the species mentioned so far are from western North America and, quite<br />

frankly, that is where the most striking species occur. Of the remaining species<br />

from that region one could mention a few other very desirable ones which are easy<br />

to cultivate, notably E. oregonum. Although superficially similar to E. californicum<br />

(mottled leaves and white flowers, usually with a zone of dark markings in the<br />

centre) the two are distinct and a check on the width of the stamen filaments<br />

will clarify any uncertainty: slender throughout their length in E. californicum but<br />

wide and flattened at the base, tapering to the apex in E. oregonum. For many<br />

years there has been in cultivation in Britain a variant known as “Sulphur form”, a<br />

pleasing variation with pale sulphur-green flowers. Unfortunately the stock came<br />

without an indication of provenance so I was intrigued to find it also in a garden<br />

in Oregon and, on enquiring, was told that it was the form from Kelley Butte.<br />

Only detailed field studies will shed further light as to whether any botanical<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!