01.05.2013 Views

LILIES - RHS Lily Group

LILIES - RHS Lily Group

LILIES - RHS Lily Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the Lyttel Cup. When I mentioned that I liked fritillaries as well as lilies, he<br />

dropped his voice and whispered conspiratorially that he had always found<br />

them “drab, brown little things”. Although he was a skilled and enthusiastic lily<br />

hybridiser, Bill believed that such plants were destined to go out of cultivation<br />

sooner or later, so he only registered four of his many creations. After his death<br />

in 2001, the <strong>Group</strong> was given his lily library and collection of bulbs. Their<br />

sale led to the establishment of a Bill Baker Fund that goes to support notable<br />

achievements in the lily world.<br />

After Tim stepped down as Chairman of the Committee, Harris Howland was<br />

prevailed upon to take over once again. As well as having an expert’s eye for<br />

a good lily, Harris has a knack for strengthening the Committee. He persuaded<br />

Alisdair Aird to join, as well as nurserymen Richard Hyde and Nigel Rowland,<br />

and got Alan Hooker back again to do the seed distribution. For a number of<br />

years he and Colin Crosbie formed an irresistible double-act at the annual bulb<br />

auction. Under his leadership, the website started by Ian Boyd assumed even<br />

greater importance with Jeff Coe as webmaster.<br />

The biggest event of this period was undoubtedly the 2004 International <strong>Lily</strong><br />

Conference, masterminded by Tim Whiteley and attended by dozens of members<br />

from all over the world. After days of fascinating lectures and garden visits, the<br />

conference culminated in a lily show at Wisley and a gala dinner where John<br />

Lykkegaard was awarded the Lyttel Cup.<br />

Today the <strong>Lily</strong> <strong>Group</strong> faces a number of challenges, some of them to its very<br />

identity. Brent reports that “in 1978 Council decided that the Committee should<br />

become semi-independent”, and we have remained that way ever since. The<br />

Society is now asking fundamental questions about how (and if) the <strong>Lily</strong> <strong>Group</strong><br />

fits into its larger picture. Our “semi-independent” relationship is no longer<br />

tenable, and we must redefine it. The Committee is grappling with various<br />

possible outcomes, and was helped and encouraged by the frank exchange<br />

of views that took place at the 2007 AGM in Birmingham. Along with the<br />

challenges there is a plethora of exciting opportunities. E-mail allows us to keep<br />

in touch with an ever-increasing number of our members without depending on<br />

an expensive and unreliable postal service. The internet can be mined for the<br />

most extensive and arcane information on lilies. Plant breeders keep on coming<br />

up with ravishing new hybrids while there is simultaneously much greater<br />

awareness of the importance of keeping the older ones in cultivation. In 1932<br />

Frederick Stern said in Council that “there is no doubt that there is a want among<br />

members and the public to join some body devoted to lilies and their culture,<br />

where they can air their views and hear other views on their especial subject”.<br />

Seventy-five years on, it’s still true.<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!