01.05.2013 Views

TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu

TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu

TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

New Mexico Spanish, where exacto > esauto or esaito and of modern<br />

Provençal, where -s unv.C/V-, but -i vC-.<br />

Here we have to take into account the nature of Vedic a, which was of a closed<br />

variety and this different from open ā. This is clear from Pāṇini's last Sūtra<br />

and has recently been shown by K. Hoffmann, Aufs.p. 552 sqq. Pluṭi cases like<br />

TS 3.2.9.5 śosā moda-iva [śsʌ mda-iuəә] @ < śasa madeva [śəәsəә<br />

məәdaiuəә], ŚB 4.3.2.14 othā modaiva indicate that pluṭi lenghtening of a<br />

resulted in [] which is different from normal ā []. - In analogy to -az vC, -az<br />

a- must have developed, at a time when pre-RV/Eastern -az vC > -e vC (sede,<br />

and az D(h)> voḍha), no longer worked, via -au a- [ əә u əә] to -o , as for<br />

example: *devaz asti > devəә u əәsti > devōsti. @<br />

By the time of Pāṇini this had taken place already, as is evident from the<br />

Sandhi employed in his grammar and his own rules at 6.1.72, 6.109 sqq. (cf.<br />

P.Thieme, Pāṇ. and the Veda, p.46 sqq.). A Padapāṭhakāra at Pāṇ.'s time<br />

then had to decide, for every single case of -e/-o, whether the following word<br />

contained an original a- or not. This is simple in cases like *aśvo vahati<br />

(where aśvo av° is impossible), more difficult in some cases where privative a-<br />

or, worse, the question of augment or no augment is involved (see K.<br />

Hoffmann, Inj. p. 146 sqq.). The only way to indicate what was intended was<br />

to insert secondarily from the Padapāṭha the Sandhi form -e /-o found before<br />

vC and to restore the "lost" a- thus: aśvo vahati, devo asti, namo astu. A<br />

pronunciation devosti [devsti]@ left no other choice, even though the early<br />

grammarians noticed that not elision but substitiution of two sounds by one<br />

had taken place.<br />

Now it is interesting to note that Pāṇini still describes alternative opinions<br />

about the way to pronounce this Sandhi at 8.3.17 sqq. The generally taught<br />

rule had been taught at 6.1.109 sqq. (substitution of -e a. -o a by e,o) 234 . The<br />

effect of this "rule" is found in all the Vedic texts, with a few ad hoc<br />

exceptions (e.g., PSOr glides -y-, MS-Kps, see below). This testifies to the<br />

effectiveness of the efforts of the redactors following this line of grammatical<br />

thought in establishing the final canon of the Ṛgveda 235 and of the various<br />

Vedic schools.<br />

Pāṇ. 8.3.17--20: 236 (the examples are taken from the Kāśikā)<br />

234 Treated in detail by P. Thieme, Pāṇini and the Veda, p. 46 sqq.<br />

235 See K.Hoffmann, Injunktiv, p. 147 sqq. An older investigation of the cases can be found<br />

at Bartholomae, Studien zur idg. Sprachgeschichte, Halle 1890, p. 81 sqq; cf.Oldenberg,<br />

Prolegomena, pp. 389, 447, also 434 sqq.<br />

236 Cf. the treatment of these rules by Bronkhorst, diss. Leiden 1980, p.101 sqq.<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!