01.05.2013 Views

TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu

TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu

TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JUB 2<br />

PB 7 (ABn 9)<br />

__________________________________________________________________<br />

The increase in the number of infinitives in -toḥ is clear, especially if the<br />

later Taitt. texts are included. TS/TB, the materials of which belong to the<br />

same strata as KS, have 30 cases of Taitt.S. + Br., as against 16 in KS. A<br />

similar increase is seen in JB/JUB (92+113%!), and the Eastern boks of ŚB<br />

participate in this spread of -toḥ. The Westrern books of ś‚ however have a<br />

low figure (58%). A comparison of the first books of both the Kāṇva and the<br />

Mādhyandina versions of ŚB is instructive. Both texts agree with each other<br />

almost word for word, except for small deviations of vocabulary and in<br />

matters of style (ŚBM 1-5 = ŚBK 1-7). But ŚBK has only 7 cases (142%)<br />

against 13 in ŚBM (180%). Again, the extreme East goes together with the<br />

Centre, while the Kāṇvas deviate and tend to agree with the texts of the West<br />

(in this case, the Western books of ŚB).<br />

The pattern of diffusion can now be described as follows. From a first<br />

attestation in RV stanzas (100%), the usage of -toḥ has been r<strong>edu</strong>ced by half<br />

in some Mantra texts. Note that the Western PS has 108 % while the Central<br />

ŚS hs only 40%; the percentage holds in part of the early mixed<br />

Mantra/Saṃh. prose texts (MS 101). Later Saṃhitā Mantra/prose texts show<br />

a steady increase: KS 171%, TS 141% (+TB 138%). The centre of expansion<br />

of this form seems to lie in the Kaṭha territory; the neighbouring Aitareyins<br />

agree with this; they show more strongly (289%) and even the late PB has 194<br />

%. From the Taittirīyas, the tendency spread southwards towards the<br />

Jaiminīyas,be it modestly: (JB 92%, JUB 113%), and the neighbouring<br />

(Pañcāla) Kauṣitakis again agreee with the Taitt.s (160%). 150<br />

While the early books of the Mādhy.ŚB strongly participate in the usage<br />

(180%), 151 the Kāṇvas, as usual, make an exception (142%) and tend to agree<br />

with the Western Śāṇḍilya school (ŚBMw 58%, cf. the enigbouring JB, based<br />

on a Central Śāṭy.Br., with only 92 %, also: MS 101 %, ŚS 40%).<br />

Later lexts like TĀ 2x, KĀ 1x, drastically r<strong>edu</strong>ce the usage of the inf. in -toḥ.<br />

But the Ait. school continues to use this inf. Just as the late AB (-toḥ + īsvara)<br />

scores 679%, so does AA (-toḥ) with 483%. This seems to be a phenomenon<br />

150 Perhaps this indicates the late time of composition of this Br., cf. the similar figures for<br />

JUB, the late ŚBMn and especially ABn..<br />

151 A text of later redaction, PB, also belongs here, with 194 %.The non-occurrence of -toḥ<br />

in the Ar. and Up.of ŚBM is unexpected.<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!