01.05.2013 Views

TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu

TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu

TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AB, KS, KpS, JS, JB, VSK, ŚBK, see below § 6.3).<br />

All of these features taken together make JB a very interesting text, both<br />

from a literary as well as from a linguistic viewpoint, but this has not really<br />

been noticed as yet. Indeed, there are many cases in JB where even stock<br />

phrases like "the gods and the Asuras were in conflict / contested," are<br />

related in the perfect tense; in other cases, the impf. has been retained. This<br />

later overlay resulted in an almost irregular usage of the perfect/imperfect. 121<br />

The figure for JB is: 23.41 % of perfetcs compared to impf., which places this<br />

text, as expected for an originally Central, now Southern text, between ŚBMw<br />

(14%), and the late KaṭhB (28%); note that a later text of the Jaim. school,<br />

their Ar./Up., JUB, has already 36% of perf., while the Central KB has 56%<br />

and the Ar./Up.of the Kauth., ChU, has an unprecendented 443% (which<br />

makes it either very late or points to a composition in the (Central) Eastern<br />

area; note the supposed movement of parts of the Kauth. towards Videha.) 122<br />

That the visualisation of the westward and southward diffusion of the<br />

narrative perfect is indeed correct is proved by the further expansion of this<br />

usage. It is only the v e r y late Brāhmaṇa/Upaniṣad texts of areas that had<br />

not been affected earlier that take over this phenomenon. In the Kaṭha<br />

school, it is found only in the (late) parts of KaṭhB, i.e., those preserved in TB<br />

3.10 (the so-called Kāṭhaka section). 123 Furthermore, it is found in the<br />

Upaniṣad-like Sāmaveda texts, ChU and JUB, in such late Brāhmaṇas as that<br />

of the Vādhūlas (the Anvākhyānas), in the Brāhmaṇa portions of the Sūtras<br />

(BŚS and ŚŚS), in the composite version of MU, in KaṭhB, and lastly, and<br />

most extraordinarily, in the later part of the Aitareya Br. (AB 6-8).<br />

This text requires further discussion. It has long been known that the<br />

original AB contained only pañcikās 1-5, and that the rest, AB 6-8, (note the<br />

name 'pañcikā'!) is a later addition. These chapters deal with materials not<br />

contained in the parallel text, KB, i.e., the rituals concerning the king, like the<br />

"coronation" ( the unction ceremonies of the Rājasūya and Abhiṣeka) and the<br />

duties of the royal priest (purohita). Also, the geographical horizon of AB 6-8<br />

is much wider than that of AB 1-5, which clearly was composed in the West,<br />

in the Kurukṣetra area.<br />

121<br />

Interchange impf. perf is studied, in some detail by Whitney, TAPA 23; cf. further,<br />

author, Fs.W.Rau; AB 2.1 āyaṃs, abibhyur KB 6.15; JB 1.42 (Varuṇa speaks), see<br />

Bodewitz, tr.JB 1.1-65, p.108, ann. 22 (Oertel).<br />

122<br />

But see ChU bhal- from smar which points to a Western/Central origin of this passage,<br />

see above, ann.33.<br />

123<br />

Note that especially those chapters of KaṭhB that deal with the late Br. concept of a<br />

second death, punarmṛtyu, are affected; see below, § 8.2 !<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!