TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu
TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu
TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
were composed on the basis of an earlier version using the imperfect. It was<br />
only by the time of the assembly of the materials and the actual composition<br />
of this Brāhmaṇa (during the late Br. period), that the usual narrative tense<br />
became the perfect, at least in the East.<br />
Yet the use of the perfect can be found in the Centre as well. KB, a text of<br />
the Pañcālas, and closely related in ritual to the Baudhāyanas, shows the<br />
perfect prominently, though a little less in degree (56%) when compared to<br />
the typically Eastern books 1-5 of ŚB (85%). It is interesting to note,<br />
however, that although KB contains more or less the same material as AB 1-5,<br />
albeit in reformulated form (a situation similar to the relationship of<br />
MS/KS:TS, PB:JB, etc.), it differs greatly in its use of the perfect from the<br />
older parts of AB. 117<br />
If one therefore surmises an origin of the narrative perfect in the East at the<br />
time of the Brāhmaṇa prose (level 4), then it is obvious that this usage had<br />
spread to the Central area by the time of the late Brāhmaṇa (KB), and had<br />
also heavily affected an originally Central, and subsquently Southern, text,<br />
JB, which varies to a great extent in the use of the narrative tenses.<br />
It must be noted here that JB is based on a mostly lost text, Śāṭyāyana Br.,<br />
which was composed in the (Kuru-) Pañcāla area. 118 Some indications of an<br />
originally Central, rather than Southern, location of JB are:<br />
-- It has both the traditional formulas about the contest 119<br />
of the gods and the Asuras (devāś cāsurāś ca saṃyattā<br />
āsan / āsuḥ :: aspardhanta/ paspṛdhire).<br />
-- It fluctuates in the use of the tenses of narration. 120<br />
-- It prefers (Central) ha (vai) to (Eastern) u hai vai; but<br />
there are cases of u ha vai as well.<br />
-- It shows the (early) Central (and late Eastern) genitive<br />
fem. in -ai.<br />
-- It has the (late) North-Western and<br />
Eastern Central ḷ- for -ḍ- (RV of Śākalya's time,<br />
117 Why is there a difference between TB, TĀ, and KB, altough they belong to the same<br />
geographical area? Was the formulation of KB late, like VādhB, or are Taitt. texts<br />
intentionally traditional, cf., the use of suvar instead of svar, etc., see Kuiper IIJ 30.1 and §<br />
6.5; see the summary on this and related topics, below §10.2 .<br />
118 See Festschr. Eggermont; cf. Caland, tr. PB, p. XVIII: "Perhaps the original<br />
Śāṭyāyanaka... was taken over by the Jaiminīyas...."<br />
119 See author in Festschrift U. Schneider, Freiburg 1987 and Fel. Vol.Eggermont.<br />
120 Caland, in: Over en uit het JB, p. 20; similarly, Oldenberg on the Brāhmaṇas as a 7hole,<br />
Prosa p.27: "bald werden bestimmter(e) oder unbestimmter(e) Motivierungen der<br />
Tempuswahl sichtbar, bald verschwimmt alles." See already Whitney, TAPA 23, summary<br />
45