01.05.2013 Views

TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu

TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu

TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

were composed on the basis of an earlier version using the imperfect. It was<br />

only by the time of the assembly of the materials and the actual composition<br />

of this Brāhmaṇa (during the late Br. period), that the usual narrative tense<br />

became the perfect, at least in the East.<br />

Yet the use of the perfect can be found in the Centre as well. KB, a text of<br />

the Pañcālas, and closely related in ritual to the Baudhāyanas, shows the<br />

perfect prominently, though a little less in degree (56%) when compared to<br />

the typically Eastern books 1-5 of ŚB (85%). It is interesting to note,<br />

however, that although KB contains more or less the same material as AB 1-5,<br />

albeit in reformulated form (a situation similar to the relationship of<br />

MS/KS:TS, PB:JB, etc.), it differs greatly in its use of the perfect from the<br />

older parts of AB. 117<br />

If one therefore surmises an origin of the narrative perfect in the East at the<br />

time of the Brāhmaṇa prose (level 4), then it is obvious that this usage had<br />

spread to the Central area by the time of the late Brāhmaṇa (KB), and had<br />

also heavily affected an originally Central, and subsquently Southern, text,<br />

JB, which varies to a great extent in the use of the narrative tenses.<br />

It must be noted here that JB is based on a mostly lost text, Śāṭyāyana Br.,<br />

which was composed in the (Kuru-) Pañcāla area. 118 Some indications of an<br />

originally Central, rather than Southern, location of JB are:<br />

-- It has both the traditional formulas about the contest 119<br />

of the gods and the Asuras (devāś cāsurāś ca saṃyattā<br />

āsan / āsuḥ :: aspardhanta/ paspṛdhire).<br />

-- It fluctuates in the use of the tenses of narration. 120<br />

-- It prefers (Central) ha (vai) to (Eastern) u hai vai; but<br />

there are cases of u ha vai as well.<br />

-- It shows the (early) Central (and late Eastern) genitive<br />

fem. in -ai.<br />

-- It has the (late) North-Western and<br />

Eastern Central ḷ- for -ḍ- (RV of Śākalya's time,<br />

117 Why is there a difference between TB, TĀ, and KB, altough they belong to the same<br />

geographical area? Was the formulation of KB late, like VādhB, or are Taitt. texts<br />

intentionally traditional, cf., the use of suvar instead of svar, etc., see Kuiper IIJ 30.1 and §<br />

6.5; see the summary on this and related topics, below §10.2 .<br />

118 See Festschr. Eggermont; cf. Caland, tr. PB, p. XVIII: "Perhaps the original<br />

Śāṭyāyanaka... was taken over by the Jaiminīyas...."<br />

119 See author in Festschrift U. Schneider, Freiburg 1987 and Fel. Vol.Eggermont.<br />

120 Caland, in: Over en uit het JB, p. 20; similarly, Oldenberg on the Brāhmaṇas as a 7hole,<br />

Prosa p.27: "bald werden bestimmter(e) oder unbestimmter(e) Motivierungen der<br />

Tempuswahl sichtbar, bald verschwimmt alles." See already Whitney, TAPA 23, summary<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!