01.05.2013 Views

TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu

TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu

TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

on an old Western SV Br. which used the impf. but probably received its<br />

redaction in the East (note the extra-ordinary high number of perfects in<br />

ChU, a late Kauth. text).<br />

* The use of the infinitive in -toḥ shows some minor variations between<br />

the various Vedas; it is strong in the YV (with the exeption of MS and the<br />

Śāṇdilya books of ŚB), ranging from 140 to 240 %, and in the RV texts:<br />

AB 289%, 323 KB 160%. The SV is a little weaker: PB 194%, JB only<br />

92%, JUB 113%. This involves both diachronic and areal features: If PB<br />

has received its redaction in the East then its percentage agrees with that<br />

of the other Eastern texts (ŚBM).<br />

(b) areal features:<br />

* The diffusion of khalu is limited to part of the YV texts (MS,TS,<br />

Mādhy.) but includes PB (§7.1), and thus is an areal feature restricted to<br />

parts of the Kuru and Pañcāla territory (including the JB) and to the<br />

extreme East . As this is more of a matter of style, the competition<br />

between various schools and their trend to set themselves off against each<br />

other may have played a role: note that there is a pattern of intermittent<br />

use viz. non-use in adjacent areas: MS-(KS)-TS-(ŚBK)-ŚBM. The case of<br />

PB is open to discussion. While PB is otherwise closely linked to the<br />

(Kap.-)Kaṭhas, the use of khalu in this text may be due to Eastern<br />

influence, at the time of redaction of PB.<br />

* sam.yat (§7.4 ) is another matter of style, but here the explanation is<br />

different. This old Western innovation that took place only in part of the<br />

Kuru area (KS,KpS) was transmitted to the Central area (TS) only. TS<br />

often copied KS during its formative period. The JUB use of sam.yat,<br />

high in percentage but limited in number, may be just a matter of<br />

chance, especially when the sprinkling of cases in other W., Central and<br />

E. texts is taken into account.<br />

* Another areal feature is the diffusion of ḷ- (§ 6.3). This is clearly limited<br />

to the West (KS,KpS,PS,AB and Śāk.RV) and part of the<br />

Central/Southern area (KB,JB). The Kāṇvas participate, as they so often<br />

do, in this Western feature. On the other hand, if one looks at the<br />

323 If the collection of the inf.-toṃ + īśvara-, made by Oertel, KZ 65, 1938, p. 55 sqq., is<br />

taken as representative (see above § 5.4), AB 1-5 has 7 cases, AB 6-8 has 9; the length of the<br />

two parts of the text is : 157 : 78 pp., 2/3 to 1/3, and thus the number of cases in ABn is<br />

about 2 times higher than expected.<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!