TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu
TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu
TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
on an old Western SV Br. which used the impf. but probably received its<br />
redaction in the East (note the extra-ordinary high number of perfects in<br />
ChU, a late Kauth. text).<br />
* The use of the infinitive in -toḥ shows some minor variations between<br />
the various Vedas; it is strong in the YV (with the exeption of MS and the<br />
Śāṇdilya books of ŚB), ranging from 140 to 240 %, and in the RV texts:<br />
AB 289%, 323 KB 160%. The SV is a little weaker: PB 194%, JB only<br />
92%, JUB 113%. This involves both diachronic and areal features: If PB<br />
has received its redaction in the East then its percentage agrees with that<br />
of the other Eastern texts (ŚBM).<br />
(b) areal features:<br />
* The diffusion of khalu is limited to part of the YV texts (MS,TS,<br />
Mādhy.) but includes PB (§7.1), and thus is an areal feature restricted to<br />
parts of the Kuru and Pañcāla territory (including the JB) and to the<br />
extreme East . As this is more of a matter of style, the competition<br />
between various schools and their trend to set themselves off against each<br />
other may have played a role: note that there is a pattern of intermittent<br />
use viz. non-use in adjacent areas: MS-(KS)-TS-(ŚBK)-ŚBM. The case of<br />
PB is open to discussion. While PB is otherwise closely linked to the<br />
(Kap.-)Kaṭhas, the use of khalu in this text may be due to Eastern<br />
influence, at the time of redaction of PB.<br />
* sam.yat (§7.4 ) is another matter of style, but here the explanation is<br />
different. This old Western innovation that took place only in part of the<br />
Kuru area (KS,KpS) was transmitted to the Central area (TS) only. TS<br />
often copied KS during its formative period. The JUB use of sam.yat,<br />
high in percentage but limited in number, may be just a matter of<br />
chance, especially when the sprinkling of cases in other W., Central and<br />
E. texts is taken into account.<br />
* Another areal feature is the diffusion of ḷ- (§ 6.3). This is clearly limited<br />
to the West (KS,KpS,PS,AB and Śāk.RV) and part of the<br />
Central/Southern area (KB,JB). The Kāṇvas participate, as they so often<br />
do, in this Western feature. On the other hand, if one looks at the<br />
323 If the collection of the inf.-toṃ + īśvara-, made by Oertel, KZ 65, 1938, p. 55 sqq., is<br />
taken as representative (see above § 5.4), AB 1-5 has 7 cases, AB 6-8 has 9; the length of the<br />
two parts of the text is : 157 : 78 pp., 2/3 to 1/3, and thus the number of cases in ABn is<br />
about 2 times higher than expected.<br />
123