TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu
TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu
TRACING VEDIC DIALECTS - People.fas.harvard.edu
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
area (purovasu-) and the Eastern area (if ŚB is, as it seems, a late text:<br />
punarmṛtyu and pāpa). Just like developments in grammar, such matters of<br />
style spread in various directions from the original centre of innovation.<br />
§9. THE RELATION OF THE <strong>VEDIC</strong> <strong>DIALECTS</strong> WITH THE EARLY<br />
PRĀKṚTS 269<br />
In this section, the peculiarities of the (Post-Ṛgvedic) language will be<br />
compared with those features which link or distinguish it from the Middle<br />
Indian dialects.<br />
Given what has been established above in §§ 1-8, it will be clear that a<br />
number of developments can be traced in the history of Vedic which are<br />
based on forms of actually spoken Vedic language, and which are not the<br />
result of simple matters of style, as, for example, the fem. gen. in -ai (as<br />
opposed to cases like the use of spṛdh or sam.yat in traditional tales of the<br />
gods).<br />
If this is so, it should not be surprising if some of these Middle and Late<br />
Vedic developments could be found in the various Prākṛts, especially in the<br />
older forms of these Prākṛts, and preferably in those MIA dialects which<br />
occupy the same area as the Vedic dialects in question. Vedic forms that are<br />
comparable to Pāli and other MIA forms have recently been treated by<br />
C.Caillat and O.v. Hinüber. 270<br />
In the sequel, I will rely mainly on forms from the recent, up-to-date<br />
treatment of the early Middle Indian by O.v. Hinüber, Das altere<br />
Mittelindisch im Überblick (SB d.Oester. Akad. d. Wiss., phil.-hist. Kl., Bd.<br />
467, Wien 1986, abbreviated O.v.Hinüber, Überblick, in the sequel). This has<br />
the additional advantage that many of the forms listed by Geiger and Pischel<br />
and used by later scholars for comparisons with Ṛgvedic Skt. have been<br />
reviewed, and the forms, wrongly attributed by earlier grammars to the<br />
various Pkt.s, are eliminated from this paper. As has long been noticed, the<br />
269 For a summary of facts see O.v. Hinüber, Überblick, §7-12<br />
270 See Die Sprache der ältesten buddhistischen Überlieferung, hg.H.Bechert, Göttingen,<br />
1980, p. 50; Fs. I.B.Horner, Dordrecht 1974, p.49, ann.49; O.v. Hinüber, Überblick, passim;<br />
and his rev. of Bechert, Die Sprache...IF 88, 1983, p.307 sqq.<br />
100