2007, Piran, Slovenia
2007, Piran, Slovenia 2007, Piran, Slovenia
Environmental Ergonomics XII Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana 2007 74 A NOVEL METHOD TO MEASURE OXYGEN CONSUMPTION DURING UNDERWATER FINNING Carol House 1 , Heather Lunt 1 , Crawford Foster 1 , Jim House 1 and Igor Mekjavic 2 1 Institute of Naval Medicine, Portsmouth, UK; 2 Josef Stefan Institute, Slovenia Contact person: Carol House hsosurv@inm.mod.uk INTRODUCTION The UK military endorses the rationale that personnel should always possess sufficient physical fitness to meet the demands of their operational role. Accordingly personnel are required to pass a fitness test before beginning training as a military diver. This consists of a timed 1.5 mile (2.4 km) run (to be completed in 10.5 mins by Navy and 9.5 mins by Army personnel), sit-ups (minimum of 40 in one minute), pullups (minimum of 8) and dips (minimum of 16). However, to be legally defensible and scientifically valid the test should be based upon objective measures that reflect critical or essential demands of the job. No recognised rationale for the current diving fitness test is available. Work by the US military indicates that their physical screening test for divers, which is similar to that used by the UK military is a poor predictor of capability to complete military diving tasks and hence has limited utility for physical selection purposes (Marcinik et al, 1995). Swimming underwater using fins and a self contained underwater breathing apparatus (SCUBA) is fundamental to the work of a military diver. Discussions with experienced military divers established a universal demand based upon searching the underside of ships for damage or ordnance. To complete this task divers must be able to fin and make progress against a tidal stream of 1.0 kts for 30 mins. The aim of this study was to quantify the aerobic demands of finning underwater in static water at 1.1 kts which was intended to simulate making headway in a tidal stream of 1.0 kts; and to determine whether a running test would be a suitable predictor of finning capability. METHOD Eight experienced military divers volunteered for the study and their informed consent was gained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The subjects undertook four dives, two in a lake and two in an immersion tank, all on separate days. For all the dives the subjects used Swimmer’s Air Breathing Apparatus MoD 1 (SABA) with full face mask, which is an open circuit SCUBA with a main cylinder and bailout cylinder each filled with compressed air. The subjects wore a dry suit and undersuit, and military issue fins. Before each dive, euhydration was assessed by measuring the specific gravity (SG) of urine samples. Any subject with an SG > 1.015 was required to drink water until the SG of his urine fell to this level. The mean (SD) temperature of the water in the lake was 6.0 (0.4)°C and in the immersion tank was 6.3 (1.7)°C. For the dives in the lake the subjects (in pairs) finned at a depth of 3 metres. The subjects were paced (by the diving boat which used GPS) to fin at 0.7 kts and following a short rest period at 1.1 kts, each for 10 minutes. (It was intended that the divers would also fin for 10 mins at 1.5 kts, but this was not possible because they could not fin at this speed). The divers followed the longitudinal jack line down the lake which ensured finning in a straight line. The velocity of each diver was confirmed by recording the actual time taken to complete the distance. Heart rate was
Diving Physiology recorded (MIE Medical Research Ltd, UK). These dives were repeated on a separate day. For the dives in the immersion tank the subjects finned at a depth of one metre on a specifically designed finning ergometer (Figure 1). The subjects undertook an incremental test to volitional exhaustion to determine peak oxygen uptake (VO2) whilst finning. On the second occasion and following completion of all the dives in the lake the subjects completed two 10 minute dives (separated by a short rest period) finning on the ergometer. The subjects finned at loads to elicit the same heart rate that would be attained during finning in the lake at 0.7 and 1.1 kts. As the dives in the lake were not completed at exactly 0.7 and 1.1 kts the heart rates at these speeds were calculated from the actual velocity and heart rate from both dives in the lake for each subject (assuming a linear relationship between velocity and heart rate). During the pool dives, exhaled gas expelled from the diving regulator was continuously collected using a Perspex hood under the water and analysed on the surface using a flow turbine (KL Engineering, USA), mixing box and oxygen and carbon dioxide analyser (PowerLab, ADInstruments, NSW, Australia). The system was calibrated using known volumes of calibration gas bubbled into the water (at different rates 20, 40, 60 and 80 L.min -1 ) in the same position in the water as gas was exhausted from subjects’ SABA. Heart rate was recorded (MIE Medical Research Ltd, UK). Expired air bubbles Figure 1. A photograph of the diver ergometer Resistance is increased by adding weights Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) was measured during running on a treadmill, using an incremental protocol to volitional exhaustion. Expired air was collected and analysed using a flow turbine (KL Engineering, USA), mixing box and oxygen and carbon dioxide analyser (PowerLab, ADInstruments, UK). Subjective assessment of how closely finning on the ergometer corresponded with finning in open water was 75
- Page 23 and 24: Table of contents ESTIMATION OF THE
- Page 25 and 26: Herman Potocnic Lecture the advanta
- Page 27 and 28: Invited presentation Gravitational
- Page 29 and 30: Gravitational Physiology SKELETAL M
- Page 31 and 32: Lf (mm) 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 Fa
- Page 33 and 34: Gravitational Physiology maximum is
- Page 35 and 36: Gravitational Physiology THERMOREGU
- Page 37 and 38: Gravitational Physiology THE EXERCI
- Page 39 and 40: Gravitational Physiology Since exer
- Page 41 and 42: Gravitational Physiology During the
- Page 43 and 44: Gravitational Physiology CARDIOVASC
- Page 45 and 46: as observed at rest after LBNP was
- Page 47 and 48: Gravitational Physiology THERMOREGU
- Page 49 and 50: Gravitational Physiology THE EFFECT
- Page 51 and 52: Gravitational Physiology Fortney SM
- Page 53 and 54: Gravitational Physiology Contractil
- Page 55 and 56: Gravitational Physiology Edgerton V
- Page 57 and 58: Diving Physiology A library of imag
- Page 59 and 60: Diving Physiology Information recal
- Page 61 and 62: Diving Physiology RESULTS Figure 1
- Page 63 and 64: Diving Physiology sensitivity is no
- Page 65 and 66: Diving Physiology Physiological Mea
- Page 67 and 68: Diving Physiology same sequence. Th
- Page 69 and 70: Diving Physiology HYPERVENTILATION
- Page 71 and 72: Diving Physiology software. Individ
- Page 73: Diving Physiology REFERENCES IMCA.
- Page 77 and 78: Diving Physiology DISCUSSION The ma
- Page 79 and 80: Altitude Physiology vastus laterali
- Page 81 and 82: Altitude Physiology IS INTERMITTENT
- Page 83 and 84: Altitude Physiology Table 2: Lactat
- Page 85 and 86: Altitude Physiology CARBOHYDRATE IN
- Page 87 and 88: Altitude Physiology Figure 1: Mean
- Page 89 and 90: Altitude Physiology HYPOXIA INDUCED
- Page 91 and 92: Altitude Physiology Figure 1. Mean
- Page 93 and 94: Altitude Physiology ANALYSIS OF MUS
- Page 95 and 96: SOL MG TA BF VM Altitude Physiology
- Page 97 and 98: Altitude Physiology LOAD CARRIAGE I
- Page 99 and 100: Table 2: Differential ratings of pe
- Page 101 and 102: Altitude Physiology EFFECTS OF INTE
- Page 103 and 104: Cerebral deoxy-Hb (delta, µM) Cere
- Page 105 and 106: Altitude Physiology ENDURANCE RESPI
- Page 107 and 108: Altitude Physiology Wylegala JA, Pe
- Page 109 and 110: Invited presentation Cognitive and
- Page 111 and 112: Cognitive and Psycophysiological Fu
- Page 113 and 114: Cognitive and Psycophysiological Fu
- Page 115 and 116: Cognitive and Psycophysiological Fu
- Page 117 and 118: Cognitive and Psycophysiological Fu
- Page 119 and 120: Cognitive and Psycophysiological Fu
- Page 121 and 122: Cognitive and Psycophysiological Fu
- Page 123 and 124: Cognitive and Psycophysiological Fu
Environmental Ergonomics XII<br />
Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana <strong>2007</strong><br />
74<br />
A NOVEL METHOD TO MEASURE OXYGEN CONSUMPTION<br />
DURING UNDERWATER FINNING<br />
Carol House 1 , Heather Lunt 1 , Crawford Foster 1 , Jim House 1 and Igor Mekjavic 2<br />
1 Institute of Naval Medicine, Portsmouth, UK; 2 Josef Stefan Institute, <strong>Slovenia</strong><br />
Contact person: Carol House hsosurv@inm.mod.uk<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The UK military endorses the rationale that personnel should always possess<br />
sufficient physical fitness to meet the demands of their operational role. Accordingly<br />
personnel are required to pass a fitness test before beginning training as a military<br />
diver. This consists of a timed 1.5 mile (2.4 km) run (to be completed in 10.5 mins by<br />
Navy and 9.5 mins by Army personnel), sit-ups (minimum of 40 in one minute), pullups<br />
(minimum of 8) and dips (minimum of 16). However, to be legally defensible and<br />
scientifically valid the test should be based upon objective measures that reflect<br />
critical or essential demands of the job. No recognised rationale for the current diving<br />
fitness test is available. Work by the US military indicates that their physical<br />
screening test for divers, which is similar to that used by the UK military is a poor<br />
predictor of capability to complete military diving tasks and hence has limited utility<br />
for physical selection purposes (Marcinik et al, 1995).<br />
Swimming underwater using fins and a self contained underwater breathing apparatus<br />
(SCUBA) is fundamental to the work of a military diver. Discussions with<br />
experienced military divers established a universal demand based upon searching the<br />
underside of ships for damage or ordnance. To complete this task divers must be able<br />
to fin and make progress against a tidal stream of 1.0 kts for 30 mins. The aim of this<br />
study was to quantify the aerobic demands of finning underwater in static water at 1.1<br />
kts which was intended to simulate making headway in a tidal stream of 1.0 kts; and<br />
to determine whether a running test would be a suitable predictor of finning<br />
capability.<br />
METHOD<br />
Eight experienced military divers volunteered for the study and their informed consent<br />
was gained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The subjects undertook<br />
four dives, two in a lake and two in an immersion tank, all on separate days. For all<br />
the dives the subjects used Swimmer’s Air Breathing Apparatus MoD 1 (SABA) with<br />
full face mask, which is an open circuit SCUBA with a main cylinder and bailout<br />
cylinder each filled with compressed air. The subjects wore a dry suit and undersuit,<br />
and military issue fins. Before each dive, euhydration was assessed by measuring the<br />
specific gravity (SG) of urine samples. Any subject with an SG > 1.015 was required<br />
to drink water until the SG of his urine fell to this level. The mean (SD) temperature<br />
of the water in the lake was 6.0 (0.4)°C and in the immersion tank was 6.3 (1.7)°C.<br />
For the dives in the lake the subjects (in pairs) finned at a depth of 3 metres. The<br />
subjects were paced (by the diving boat which used GPS) to fin at 0.7 kts and<br />
following a short rest period at 1.1 kts, each for 10 minutes. (It was intended that the<br />
divers would also fin for 10 mins at 1.5 kts, but this was not possible because they<br />
could not fin at this speed). The divers followed the longitudinal jack line down the<br />
lake which ensured finning in a straight line. The velocity of each diver was<br />
confirmed by recording the actual time taken to complete the distance. Heart rate was