2007, Piran, Slovenia
2007, Piran, Slovenia 2007, Piran, Slovenia
Environmental Ergonomics XII Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana 2007 ESTIMATION OF THE CONTRIBUTION OF SOLAR RADIATION TO THERMAL STRESS DURING OUTDOOR ACTIVITY Ju Youn Kwon, Ken Parsons Human Thermal Environments Laboratory, Department of Human Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU United Kingdom Contact person: j.y.kwon@lboro.ac.uk INTRODUCTION The sun provides heat in the form of electro-magnetic radiation to the surface of the earth’s atmosphere at a level of around 1370 Wm -2 (Monteith and Unsworth (1990); Parsons (2003)). This arrives on the surface of the earth at a maximum of around 1000 Wm -2 , depending upon weather conditions. People working outdoors will receive this heat as part of their thermal environment. Some of the heat will be absorbed by the person and it will influence the heat exchange between the body and the environment. Any comprehensive method for assessing thermal strain in outdoor conditions must therefore consider the contribution of solar radiation. It was the aim of this study to estimate the contribution of solar radiation to people when working outdoors using three methods: human subjects; a thermal manikin and theoretical analysis. The results not only provide estimates of the contribution of solar radiation but also of the relative strengths of the three methods used. METHODS STUDY ONE: Estimation of the contribution of the sun to thermal stress using a human subject: A fit male subject (30 y, 1.76 m, 91 kg) conducted a step test for one hour at 20 steps per min with a step height of 0.2 m, first in a car park outdoors in the sun and later at the same time of day, in a thermal chamber. The subject was weighed before and after the ‘exposure’ using Mettler 1D1 Multi-range Digital Dynamic Scales. Oral temperature was measured before and after the exposure using a mercury in glass clinical thermometer. Heart rate was measured using a Polar Sports Tester. Environmental conditions were recorded around the subject. Air temperature was measured using shielded thermistors placed at heights equally spaced from 0.2 m to 1.7 m. Globe temperature was recorded at 1 m and 1.6 m both in the shade and in the sun (outdoors). Radiation levels were measured using a Skye pyranometer SP 1110. Air velocity was measured using a hot wire anemometer. Humidity was measured using a whirling hygrometer. Clothing worn was a white cotton/polyester shirt, beige trousers, briefs, socks and trainers. RESULTS The environmental conditions outdoors and in the thermal chamber are presented in Table 1. It can be seen that conditions indoors were a good simulation, on average, of the outdoor conditions but indoors the globe temperature and hence mean radiant temperature were close to air temperature as there is no contribution from the sun. Humidity and solar radiation in outdoor condition and indoor humidity were relatively constant at 54%, 423 Wm -2 , and 52% respectively. The fluctuation in conditions over the one hour of exposure is shown in Figure 1. Of particular interest is the simulation of air movement. Indoors this was achieved using fans. In practice it is difficult to simulate the three-dimensional and dynamic nature of air movement around a subject so it is assumed that simulation on average provides a good approximation to heat transfer conditions. 620
Table 1: Environmental conditions outdoors and in the thermal chamber °C 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 10 Occupational Thermal Problems Outdoors Indoors Air temperature, ta(ºC) 23 23 Mean radiant temperature, tr(ºC) 33 23 Air velocity, v(ms -1 ) 0.75 0.73 Relative humidity, ø(%) 54 52 Solar radiation(Wm -2 ) 423 20 30 Min 40 50 Outdoor ta(ºC) Outdoor tr(ºC) Indoor ta(ºC) Indoor tr(ºC) Outdoor v(m/s) Indoor v(m/s) Figure 1: Environmental conditions outdoors and in the thermal chamber The weights of the subject before and after the exposure and calculated sweat production are presented in Table 2. Table 2: Weight of subject and clothing and sweat production.(g) 60 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 m/s Outdoors Indoors Before After Before After Semi-nude Weight 91037 90406 88538 88145 Clothed Weight 91780 91207 89188 88818 Weight of clothing 743 801 650 673 Sweat production(g/h) 557 310 It can be concluded that the subject produced 247g/h of additional sweat due to the contribution of the sun. This can be interpreted as adding a thermal load of 80 Wm -2 to the body. STUDY TWO: Estimation of the contribution of the sun to thermal stress using a thermal manikin: The thermal manikin was suspended near to the subject during the experiment carried out indoors and outdoors (STUDY 1) and hence under identical conditions. The heat 621
- Page 569 and 570: Working Environment METHODS Student
- Page 571 and 572: Working Environment ANTHROPOGENIC I
- Page 573 and 574: Working Environment RESULTS The res
- Page 575 and 576: Employment Standards VISUAL ACUITY
- Page 577 and 578: Employment Standards Results are pr
- Page 579 and 580: Employment Standards to spend free
- Page 581 and 582: Occupational Thermal Problems and d
- Page 583 and 584: Occupational Thermal Problems HEAT
- Page 585 and 586: Occupational Thermal Problems some
- Page 587 and 588: Occupational Thermal Problems HORSE
- Page 589 and 590: Occupational Thermal Problems range
- Page 591 and 592: Occupational Thermal Problems PHYSI
- Page 593 and 594: Occupational Thermal Problems DISCU
- Page 595 and 596: Occupational Thermal Problems recom
- Page 597 and 598: DLEmin [hours] 7,0 6,0 5,0 4,0 3,0
- Page 599 and 600: Occupational Thermal Problems EFFEC
- Page 601 and 602: Occupational Thermal Problems PERIP
- Page 603 and 604: Occupational Thermal Problems durin
- Page 605 and 606: Occupational Thermal Problems PRODU
- Page 607 and 608: Time (hours) 4 3,5 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,
- Page 609 and 610: Occupational Thermal Problems (Suun
- Page 611 and 612: Occupational Thermal Problems highl
- Page 613 and 614: Occupational Thermal Problems and o
- Page 615 and 616: 1) estimated (208 - 0.7 x age) *P
- Page 617 and 618: Occupational Thermal Problems of a
- Page 619: Occupational Thermal Problems tempe
- Page 623 and 624: Occupational Thermal Problems The h
- Page 625 and 626: Occupational Thermal Problems RESUL
- Page 627 and 628: Occupational Thermal Problems PHYSI
- Page 629 and 630: Occupational Thermal Problems corre
- Page 631 and 632: Occupational Thermal Problems DEVEL
- Page 633 and 634: Occupational Thermal Problems All i
- Page 635 and 636: A Adolfsson Niklas 540 Ainslie Phil
- Page 637 and 638: Kim Myung-Ju 409 Kim Taegyou 189 Kl
- Page 639 and 640: Sormunen Erja 599 Spindler Uli 145
- Page 641: SPONSOR 641
Environmental Ergonomics XII<br />
Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana <strong>2007</strong><br />
ESTIMATION OF THE CONTRIBUTION OF SOLAR RADIATION TO<br />
THERMAL STRESS DURING OUTDOOR ACTIVITY<br />
Ju Youn Kwon, Ken Parsons<br />
Human Thermal Environments Laboratory, Department of Human Sciences, Loughborough<br />
University, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Contact person: j.y.kwon@lboro.ac.uk<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The sun provides heat in the form of electro-magnetic radiation to the surface of the earth’s<br />
atmosphere at a level of around 1370 Wm -2 (Monteith and Unsworth (1990); Parsons<br />
(2003)). This arrives on the surface of the earth at a maximum of around 1000 Wm -2 ,<br />
depending upon weather conditions. People working outdoors will receive this heat as part of<br />
their thermal environment. Some of the heat will be absorbed by the person and it will<br />
influence the heat exchange between the body and the environment. Any comprehensive<br />
method for assessing thermal strain in outdoor conditions must therefore consider the<br />
contribution of solar radiation. It was the aim of this study to estimate the contribution of<br />
solar radiation to people when working outdoors using three methods: human subjects; a<br />
thermal manikin and theoretical analysis. The results not only provide estimates of the<br />
contribution of solar radiation but also of the relative strengths of the three methods used.<br />
METHODS<br />
STUDY ONE: Estimation of the contribution of the sun to thermal stress using a human<br />
subject: A fit male subject (30 y, 1.76 m, 91 kg) conducted a step test for one hour at 20 steps<br />
per min with a step height of 0.2 m, first in a car park outdoors in the sun and later at the same<br />
time of day, in a thermal chamber. The subject was weighed before and after the ‘exposure’<br />
using Mettler 1D1 Multi-range Digital Dynamic Scales. Oral temperature was measured<br />
before and after the exposure using a mercury in glass clinical thermometer. Heart rate was<br />
measured using a Polar Sports Tester. Environmental conditions were recorded around the<br />
subject. Air temperature was measured using shielded thermistors placed at heights equally<br />
spaced from 0.2 m to 1.7 m. Globe temperature was recorded at 1 m and 1.6 m both in the<br />
shade and in the sun (outdoors). Radiation levels were measured using a Skye pyranometer<br />
SP 1110. Air velocity was measured using a hot wire anemometer. Humidity was measured<br />
using a whirling hygrometer. Clothing worn was a white cotton/polyester shirt, beige trousers,<br />
briefs, socks and trainers.<br />
RESULTS<br />
The environmental conditions outdoors and in the thermal chamber are presented in Table 1.<br />
It can be seen that conditions indoors were a good simulation, on average, of the outdoor<br />
conditions but indoors the globe temperature and hence mean radiant temperature were close<br />
to air temperature as there is no contribution from the sun.<br />
Humidity and solar radiation in outdoor condition and indoor humidity were relatively<br />
constant at 54%, 423 Wm -2 , and 52% respectively. The fluctuation in conditions over the one<br />
hour of exposure is shown in Figure 1. Of particular interest is the simulation of air<br />
movement. Indoors this was achieved using fans. In practice it is difficult to simulate the<br />
three-dimensional and dynamic nature of air movement around a subject so it is assumed that<br />
simulation on average provides a good approximation to heat transfer conditions.<br />
620