2007, Piran, Slovenia
2007, Piran, Slovenia 2007, Piran, Slovenia
Environmental Ergonomics XII Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana 2007 EFFECTS OF PRESSURE, GLOVES AND COLD ON HAND SKIN TEMPERATURE AND MANUAL PERFORMANCE OF DIVERS Joanna Zander and James Morrison, Environmental Physiology Unit, Simon Fraser University, BC, Canada Contact person: jmorriso@sfu.ca INTRODUCTION Exposure to cold and the use of protective gloves are associated with decreased manual performance capabilities. Three-fingered neoprene gloves slow hand cooling and preserve hand function; however, there is little information on whether neoprene gloves provide sufficient insulation to maintain hand skin temperature when diving in cold water. Hand skin temperature is an important predictor of manual performance. Fox (1967) suggested that tactile sensitivity is degraded below a critical hand skin temperature of 12-16°C and that manual dexterity is degraded below a critical temperature of 8°C. Vincent and Tipton (1988) reported a decrease in finger dexterity below a skin temperature of 20-22° C, becoming significant below 15-16°C METHODS Nine male divers between 20 to 40 years completed the experiment. Four environmental conditions were selected to identify the effects of cold, pressure and exposure time on hand skin temperature and on manual performance of divers wearing three-fingered Rubatex ® G-231-N neoprene gloves (Table 1). All conditions were completed in the wet section of a hyperbaric chamber at Simon Fraser University (altitude 360 m). Divers were seated at a table while immersed to the neck in water and wearing a dry suit. Skin temperatures (thumb, index finger, back of hand, forearm, chest and head) were measured using copper-constantan thermocouples. Table 1: Experimental Conditions Condition Water Temperature Pressure Gloves Exposure time 1 25°C 0.4 msw Yes 4 min. 2 25°C 40 msw Yes 4 min. 3 4°C 0.4 msw Yes 4, 11, and 18 min. 4 4°C 40 msw Yes 4, 11, and 18 min. Each diver completed three manual performance tests that were designed to measure grip strength, tactile sensitivity, and manual dexterity. The test series took 7 minutes and are described in detail in Morrison and Zander, 2005. In the cold conditions, the tests were repeated commencing at 4, 11 and 18 minutes of exposure. Observations were made at depths of 0.4 metres of seawater (msw) (101 kPa altitude adjusted) and 40 msw (497 kPa). Data were analysed to determine hand skin temperatures as a function of exposure time when wearing neoprene gloves in 4°C water, and to quantify manual performance abilities a function of finger temperature while wearing neoprene gloves. Manual performance scores were compared using ANOVA to identify differences associated with exposure to cold water and increased pressure. 60
Diving Physiology RESULTS Figure 1 shows skin temperatures of one diver as a function of exposure time, when immersed in 4°C water at a pressure of 40 msw. Figure 1: Skin temperatures ( o C) as a function of exposure time (4°C water; 40 msw) Mean head and chest temperatures remained relatively constant while forearm temperature dropped by 6-7 o C over 27 minutes of exposure to 4°C water. As finger and hand skin temperatures were non linear with time, temperatures were modelled using an exponential function of the form Tsk = A e -kt + B to obtain a best fit to the data (Table 2). Table 2: Best fit regression of finger and back of hand skin temperature (Tsk) as a function of cold exposure time (t) Finger 0.4 msw Tsk=12.3*exp(-.107*t)+14.7 R2=0.99 Temperature °C 40 msw Tsk = 24.0*exp(-0.102*t)+9.0 R2=0.97 Back of Hand 0.4 msw Tsk =7.2*exp(-.108*t)+17.7 R2=0.94 Temperature °C 40 msw Tsk = 19.1*exp(-.069*t)+11.2 R2=0.95 The regression equations predict that finger skin temperature will reach equilibrium at approximately 14.7°C in 0.4 msw, compared with approximately 9°C in 40 msw. Thus at 40 msw, equilibrium temperature is reached at only 5°C above water temperature, compared with a skin-water temperature difference of 10.7°C at 0.4 msw. Thus at 40 msw the protective effect of neoprene is reduced to approximately 50% of its surface value. There were no significant changes in grip strength due to exposure to 4°C water or increased pressure when wearing three-fingered neoprene gloves. There was an increasing impairment of tactile sensitivity with time of exposure to 4°C water (F=12.0, p
- Page 9 and 10: Table of contents ALTITUDE ATTENUAT
- Page 11 and 12: Table of contents TOWARDS PREVENTIO
- Page 13 and 14: Table of contents RATE AFFECT EXERC
- Page 15 and 16: Table of contents Uroš Dobnikar, S
- Page 17 and 18: Table of contents TO A HOT ENVIRONM
- Page 19 and 20: Table of contents Andreas D. Flouri
- Page 21 and 22: Table of contents PHYSICAL FITNESS
- Page 23 and 24: Table of contents ESTIMATION OF THE
- Page 25 and 26: Herman Potocnic Lecture the advanta
- Page 27 and 28: Invited presentation Gravitational
- Page 29 and 30: Gravitational Physiology SKELETAL M
- Page 31 and 32: Lf (mm) 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 Fa
- Page 33 and 34: Gravitational Physiology maximum is
- Page 35 and 36: Gravitational Physiology THERMOREGU
- Page 37 and 38: Gravitational Physiology THE EXERCI
- Page 39 and 40: Gravitational Physiology Since exer
- Page 41 and 42: Gravitational Physiology During the
- Page 43 and 44: Gravitational Physiology CARDIOVASC
- Page 45 and 46: as observed at rest after LBNP was
- Page 47 and 48: Gravitational Physiology THERMOREGU
- Page 49 and 50: Gravitational Physiology THE EFFECT
- Page 51 and 52: Gravitational Physiology Fortney SM
- Page 53 and 54: Gravitational Physiology Contractil
- Page 55 and 56: Gravitational Physiology Edgerton V
- Page 57 and 58: Diving Physiology A library of imag
- Page 59: Diving Physiology Information recal
- Page 63 and 64: Diving Physiology sensitivity is no
- Page 65 and 66: Diving Physiology Physiological Mea
- Page 67 and 68: Diving Physiology same sequence. Th
- Page 69 and 70: Diving Physiology HYPERVENTILATION
- Page 71 and 72: Diving Physiology software. Individ
- Page 73 and 74: Diving Physiology REFERENCES IMCA.
- Page 75 and 76: Diving Physiology recorded (MIE Med
- Page 77 and 78: Diving Physiology DISCUSSION The ma
- Page 79 and 80: Altitude Physiology vastus laterali
- Page 81 and 82: Altitude Physiology IS INTERMITTENT
- Page 83 and 84: Altitude Physiology Table 2: Lactat
- Page 85 and 86: Altitude Physiology CARBOHYDRATE IN
- Page 87 and 88: Altitude Physiology Figure 1: Mean
- Page 89 and 90: Altitude Physiology HYPOXIA INDUCED
- Page 91 and 92: Altitude Physiology Figure 1. Mean
- Page 93 and 94: Altitude Physiology ANALYSIS OF MUS
- Page 95 and 96: SOL MG TA BF VM Altitude Physiology
- Page 97 and 98: Altitude Physiology LOAD CARRIAGE I
- Page 99 and 100: Table 2: Differential ratings of pe
- Page 101 and 102: Altitude Physiology EFFECTS OF INTE
- Page 103 and 104: Cerebral deoxy-Hb (delta, µM) Cere
- Page 105 and 106: Altitude Physiology ENDURANCE RESPI
- Page 107 and 108: Altitude Physiology Wylegala JA, Pe
- Page 109 and 110: Invited presentation Cognitive and
Environmental Ergonomics XII<br />
Igor B. Mekjavic, Stelios N. Kounalakis & Nigel A.S. Taylor (Eds.), © BIOMED, Ljubljana <strong>2007</strong><br />
EFFECTS OF PRESSURE, GLOVES AND COLD ON HAND SKIN<br />
TEMPERATURE AND MANUAL PERFORMANCE OF DIVERS<br />
Joanna Zander and James Morrison,<br />
Environmental Physiology Unit, Simon Fraser University, BC, Canada<br />
Contact person: jmorriso@sfu.ca<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Exposure to cold and the use of protective gloves are associated with decreased<br />
manual performance capabilities. Three-fingered neoprene gloves slow hand cooling<br />
and preserve hand function; however, there is little information on whether neoprene<br />
gloves provide sufficient insulation to maintain hand skin temperature when diving in<br />
cold water.<br />
Hand skin temperature is an important predictor of manual performance. Fox (1967)<br />
suggested that tactile sensitivity is degraded below a critical hand skin temperature of<br />
12-16°C and that manual dexterity is degraded below a critical temperature of 8°C.<br />
Vincent and Tipton (1988) reported a decrease in finger dexterity below a skin<br />
temperature of 20-22° C, becoming significant below 15-16°C<br />
METHODS<br />
Nine male divers between 20 to 40 years completed the experiment. Four<br />
environmental conditions were selected to identify the effects of cold, pressure and<br />
exposure time on hand skin temperature and on manual performance of divers<br />
wearing three-fingered Rubatex ® G-231-N neoprene gloves (Table 1). All<br />
conditions were completed in the wet section of a hyperbaric chamber at Simon Fraser<br />
University (altitude 360 m). Divers were seated at a table while immersed to the neck<br />
in water and wearing a dry suit. Skin temperatures (thumb, index finger, back of<br />
hand, forearm, chest and head) were measured using copper-constantan<br />
thermocouples.<br />
Table 1: Experimental Conditions<br />
Condition Water Temperature Pressure Gloves Exposure time<br />
1 25°C 0.4 msw Yes 4 min.<br />
2 25°C 40 msw Yes 4 min.<br />
3 4°C 0.4 msw Yes 4, 11, and 18 min.<br />
4 4°C 40 msw Yes 4, 11, and 18 min.<br />
Each diver completed three manual performance tests that were designed to measure<br />
grip strength, tactile sensitivity, and manual dexterity. The test series took 7 minutes<br />
and are described in detail in Morrison and Zander, 2005. In the cold conditions, the<br />
tests were repeated commencing at 4, 11 and 18 minutes of exposure. Observations<br />
were made at depths of 0.4 metres of seawater (msw) (101 kPa altitude adjusted) and<br />
40 msw (497 kPa). Data were analysed to determine hand skin temperatures as a<br />
function of exposure time when wearing neoprene gloves in 4°C water, and to<br />
quantify manual performance abilities a function of finger temperature while wearing<br />
neoprene gloves. Manual performance scores were compared using ANOVA to<br />
identify differences associated with exposure to cold water and increased pressure.<br />
60